IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v14y2023i4d10.1007_s13132-022-01087-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open vs Closed Business Model: Exploring Its Role in Innovation in Indian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Author

Listed:
  • Meeta Dasgupta

    (Management Development Institute)

Abstract

The current business environment demands enterprises to innovate, address needs of customers, and capture value. This requires them to take a relook at their business models. With very less research exploring the business models and their contribution to innovation initiatives of SMEs in an emerging country like India, the current study attempts to fill the gap. Methodology is qualitative consisting of four case studies of Indian SMEs, in the manufacturing and services sector, exploring their business models, through the lens of open vs closed, and the innovation initiatives taken by them. Results show that the SMEs have business models that are primarily closed or partially open. A partially open approach drives the initial stages of innovation, that is, opportunity recognition and solution selection, with the approach being primarily closed during the latter stages of solution development and commercialization. Manufacturing and service SMEs exhibit different shades of openness in the business model elements. These findings can be used by SMEs to take decisions with respect to opening up certain elements of their business model to drive innovation and competitiveness. Theoretically, this research documents the findings of different business model elements of SMEs, presents them through the lens of open vs closed business models, and links them to different stages of innovation. The results of the study based on four case studies, however, cannot be taken as conclusive and need to be interpreted with caution.

Suggested Citation

  • Meeta Dasgupta, 2023. "Open vs Closed Business Model: Exploring Its Role in Innovation in Indian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4973-5002, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-022-01087-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-022-01087-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-022-01087-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-022-01087-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lamiae Benhayoun-Sadafiyine & Néstor Fabián Ayala & Marie-Anne Le Dain, 2021. "SMEs innovating in collaborative networks: how does absorptive capacity matter for innovation performance in times of good partnership quality?," Post-Print halshs-03232737, HAL.
    2. Massimo G. Colombo & Douglas Cumming & Ali Mohammadi & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra & Anu Wadhwa, 2016. "Open business models and venture capital finance," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(2), pages 353-370.
    3. JinHyo Joseph Yun & DongKyu Won & KyungBae Park & JeongHo Yang & Xiaofei Zhao, 2017. "Growth of a platform business model as an entrepreneurial ecosystem and its effects on regional development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 805-826, May.
    4. Paiola, Marco & Saccani, Nicola & Perona, Marco & Gebauer, Heiko, 2013. "Moving from products to solutions: Strategic approaches for developing capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 390-409.
    5. Zhu, Xiaoxuan & Xiao, Zhenxin & Dong, Maggie Chuoyan & Gu, Jibao, 2019. "The fit between firms’ open innovation and business model for new product development speed: A contingent perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 75-85.
    6. Dragana Radicic & Geoffrey Pugh & David Douglas, 2020. "Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 257-283, January.
    7. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Kumar Kar, Arpan, 2020. "Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Joseph Feller & Patrick Finnegan & Olof Nilsson, 2011. "Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 358-374, May.
    9. Saebi, Tina & Foss, Nicolai J., 2015. "Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 201-213.
    10. Animesh Agrawal & Chitranjan Kumar & Suraj Kumar Mukti, 2021. "Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to Enhance the Success of Knowledge Management (KM): a Study in a Steel Plant," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1760-1786, December.
    11. Marvin Drewel & Leon Özcan & Jürgen Gausemeier & Roman Dumitrescu, 2021. "Platform Patterns—Using Proven Principles to Develop Digital Platforms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 519-543, June.
    12. Visnjic, Ivanka & Neely, Andy & Jovanovic, Marin, 2018. "The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 72, pages 46-59.
    13. Farnaz Fallah Tafti & Neda Abdolvand & Saeedeh Rajaee Harandi, 2019. "A strategic alignment model for collaborative open innovation networks," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 1-28.
    14. Landoni, Paolo & Dell’era, Claudio & Frattini, Federico & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Verganti, Roberto & Manelli, Luca, 2020. "Business model innovation in cultural and creative industries: Insights from three leading mobile gaming firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    15. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    16. Xueli Huang & Geoffrey N. Soutar & Alan Brown, 2002. "New Product Development Processes in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Some Australian Evidence," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 27-42, January.
    17. Thomas Bilaliib Udimal & Zhuang Jincai & Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah & Cheng Hua, 2019. "Determinants of new products innovation in Ghanaian SMEs sector," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Susanne Durst & Serdal Temel & Christoph Hinteregger, 2020. "Influence of network partners on SMEs' innovation activities," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 369-389.
    19. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo del Río & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2021. "On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1531-1547, May.
    20. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    2. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    3. Abbate, Tindara & Cesaroni, Fabrizio & Cinici, Maria Cristina & Villari, Massimo, 2019. "Business models for developing smart cities. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of an IoT platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 183-193.
    4. Yngve Dahle & Kevin Reuther & Martin Steinert & Magne Supphellen, 2023. "Towards a systemic entrepreneurship activity model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1583-1610, December.
    5. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    6. Jovanovic, Marin & Raja, Jawwad Z. & Visnjic, Ivanka & Wiengarten, Frank, 2019. "Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 472-485.
    7. Jiang, Zhenyu & Wang, Zongjun, 2024. "Impel or impede? Revealing the effect of the integration into innovation ecosystems on the development of SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Afnan Zafar, 2020. "Reasons for outsourcing innovations and its effect on firm performance: Evidence from highly innovative firms from twenty countries," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 305-319, November.
    9. Visnjic, Ivanka & Neely, Andy & Jovanovic, Marin, 2018. "The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 72, pages 46-59.
    10. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.
    11. Patrizia Di Tullio & Diego Valentinetti & Michele Antonio Rea, 2018. "Integrating The Business Model Puzzle: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 9(1), pages 1-46, June.
    12. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Chen, Jialing, 2023. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between collaborative innovation and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    14. Maximilian Bock & Martin Wiener & Carol Saunders, 2023. "Non-ownership business models in the manufacturing industry: Uncertainty-exploiting versus uncertainty-mitigating designs and the role of context factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    16. Haftor, Darek. M. & Climent Costa, Ricardo, 2023. "Five dimensions of business model innovation: A multi-case exploration of industrial incumbent firm’s business model transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Luo, Xingwu & Cao, Dongmei & Tjahjono, Benny & Adegbile, Abiodun, 2022. "Business model innovation themes of emerging market enterprises: Evidence in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1619-1630.
    18. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Lafuente, Esteban & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Vaillant, Yancy & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2019. "Make-or-buy configurational approaches in product-service ecosystems and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 393-401.
    19. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel & Benz, Lukas & Hartmann, Evi & Matzner, Martin, 2022. "Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-022-01087-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.