IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v3y2020i1d10.1007_s42001-020-00062-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Second-order micromotives and macrobehaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Collard

    (Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire I3S, UCA, Parc Valrose)

Abstract

This paper deals with the gap between the preferences of individual agents and collective outcomes. The typical example of this topic is the Schelling–Sakoda segregation model where a first-order discrimination criterion is used to decide whether or not a person will leave his place. Based on the ratio of “acceptable” people around one individual, simple simulations show that even tolerant agents end up being spatially aggregated far beyond of the local requirement of their tolerance level. Here, we use a second-order discrimination criterion to compel people to leave their places, that is a criterion based on the result of the first-order one. According to the respective strength of the two criteria, the problematic will be to determine the spatial repartition of the agents resulting from their moves. This paper provides some answers to the question: does a second-order criterion contribute or not to reduce the gap between micromotives and macrobehaviour?

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Collard, 2020. "Second-order micromotives and macrobehaviour," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 209-229, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:3:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-020-00062-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-020-00062-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-020-00062-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-020-00062-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Sebastian Grauwin & Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Working Papers 0914, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    3. L. Gauvin & J. Vannimenus & J.-P. Nadal, 2009. "Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 293-304, July.
    4. Carrington, William J & Troske, Kenneth R, 1997. "On Measuring Segregation in Samples with Small Units," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 15(4), pages 402-409, October.
    5. Rainer Hegselmann, 2017. "Thomas C. Schelling and James M. Sakoda: The Intellectual, Technical, and Social History of a Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15.
    6. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2003. "The nature of human altruism," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6960), pages 785-791, October.
    7. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grauwin, Sébastian & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Jensen, Pablo, 2012. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 124-141.
    2. Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Significant suppression of segregation in Schelling’s metapopulation model with star-type underlying topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(7), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2004. "Neighborhood income distributions," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 435-457, November.
    4. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen & Sebastian Grauwin, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Post-Print halshs-00404400, HAL.
    6. Pablo Medina & Eric Goles & Roberto Zarama & Sergio Rica, 2017. "Self-Organized Societies: On the Sakoda Model of Social Interactions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, January.
    7. Gabriele Ruoff & Gerald Schneider, 2006. "Segregation in the Classroom," Rationality and Society, , vol. 18(1), pages 95-117, February.
    8. Itzhak Benenson & Erez Hatna & Ehud Or, 2009. "From Schelling to Spatially Explicit Modeling of Urban Ethnic and Economic Residential Dynamics," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 463-497, May.
    9. Akihisa Okada & Daisuke Inoue & Shihori Koyama & Tadayoshi Matsumori & Hiroaki Yoshida, 2022. "Dynamical cooperation model for mitigating the segregation phase in Schelling’s model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(10), pages 1-10, October.
    10. Sheng Li & Kuo-Liang Chang & Lanlan Wang, 2020. "Racial residential segregation in multiple neighborhood markets: a dynamic sorting study," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 363-383, April.
    11. Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2006. "ACE Models of Endogenous Interactions," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 1047-1079, Elsevier.
    12. Jean Louis Dessalles & Denis Phan, 2005. "Emergence in multi-agent systems:Cognitive hierarchy, detection, and complexity reduction," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 257, Society for Computational Economics.
    13. Riccardo Boero & Flaminio Squazzoni, 2005. "Does Empirical Embeddedness Matter? Methodological Issues on Agent-Based Models for Analytical Social Science," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-6.
    14. Caridi, I. & Pinasco, J.P. & Saintier, N. & Schiaffino, P., 2017. "Characterizing segregation in the Schelling–Voter model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 487(C), pages 125-142.
    15. Anand Sahasranaman & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2016. "Dynamics of Transformation from Segregation to Mixed Wealth Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Daniel Richards, 2004. "Price Discrimination and the Long Boom," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0419, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    17. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    18. Glitz, Albrecht, 2014. "Ethnic segregation in Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 28-40.
    19. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    20. Christine Clavien & Colby J Tanner & Fabrice Clément & Michel Chapuisat, 2012. "Choosy Moral Punishers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-6, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:3:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-020-00062-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.