IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v97y2024i3d10.1140_epjb_s10051-024-00667-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noise effects in Schelling metapopulation model with underlying star topology

Author

Listed:
  • Yihan Liu

    (Shanghai Normal University)

  • Guifeng Su

    (Shanghai Normal University)

  • Yi Zhang

    (Shanghai Normal University)

Abstract

The Schelling model, one of the most famous agent-based models in social physics, describes the formation of social segregated groups of agents based on their preferences. It has received significant attention, and various versions of the model have been extensively developed and studied as well. In this paper, we examine the impact of noise on Schelling’s metapopulation segregation model, specifically focusing on an underlying star topological structure. Our findings demonstrate that the fascinating effects caused by the star topology become fragile when the model is subjected to noise. We conducted theoretical analyses and numerical simulations to investigate the stationary state of the systems, their evolutionary process, and the distribution of the agents. Our results indicate that the anomaly in optimizing collective utility by egoists diminishes at a non-vanishing level of noise. On the other hand, altruists regain their ability to optimize collective utility. As the noise level increases, the resulting randomness becomes dominant in the movement of agents, leading to a reduced distinction between the two types of agents and eventually become random walkers. Graphical abstract The intriguing effects of Schelling’s metapopulation segregation model with underlying star topology become fragile when noise parameter is introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Yihan Liu & Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2024. "Noise effects in Schelling metapopulation model with underlying star topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:97:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-024-00667-7
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00667-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00667-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00667-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grauwin, Sébastian & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Jensen, Pablo, 2012. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 124-141.
    2. Fagiolo, Giorgio & Valente, Marco & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Segregation in networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 64(3-4), pages 316-336.
    3. Blume Lawrence E., 1993. "The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 387-424, July.
    4. L. Gauvin & J. Vannimenus & J.-P. Nadal, 2009. "Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 293-304, July.
    5. Yuanzhao Zhang & Maxime Lucas & Federico Battiston, 2023. "Higher-order interactions shape collective dynamics differently in hypergraphs and simplicial complexes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of Segregation in Small-World Networks," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Ahmad K. Naimzada & Silvana Stefani & Anna Torriero (ed.), Networks, Topology and Dynamics, pages 111-126, Springer.
    8. Huang, Jiechen & Wang, Juan & Xia, Chengyi, 2020. "Role of vaccine efficacy in the vaccination behavior under myopic update rule on complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of Segregation in Small-World Networks," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Ahmad K. Naimzada & Silvana Stefani & Anna Torriero (ed.), Networks, Topology and Dynamics, pages 111-126, Springer.
    10. Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Significant suppression of segregation in Schelling’s metapopulation model with star-type underlying topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Significant suppression of segregation in Schelling’s metapopulation model with star-type underlying topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(7), pages 1-6, July.
    2. Sheng Li & Kuo-Liang Chang & Lanlan Wang, 2020. "Racial residential segregation in multiple neighborhood markets: a dynamic sorting study," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 363-383, April.
    3. Zhiwei Cui & Yan-An Hwang, 2017. "House exchange and residential segregation in networks," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 125-147, March.
    4. Isabel Melguizo, 2023. "Group representation concerns and network formation," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 151-179, January.
    5. Grauwin, Sébastian & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Jensen, Pablo, 2012. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 124-141.
    6. Roy Cerqueti & Luca De Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 384-440, May.
    7. Harting, Philipp & Radi, Davide, 2020. "Residential segregation: The role of inequality and housing subsidies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 801-819.
    8. Mathew, Ann Mary & Sasidevan, V., 2025. "Modeling competition for space: Emergent inefficiency and inequality due to spatial self-organization among a group of crowd-avoiding agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 660(C).
    9. Laura Gardini & Davide Radi, 2018. "A piecewise smooth model of evolutionary game for residential mobility and segregation," Working Papers 1802, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2018.
    10. Gandica, Yerali & Gargiulo, Floriana & Carletti, Timoteo, 2016. "Can topology reshape segregation patterns?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-54.
    11. Akihisa Okada & Daisuke Inoue & Shihori Koyama & Tadayoshi Matsumori & Hiroaki Yoshida, 2022. "Dynamical cooperation model for mitigating the segregation phase in Schelling’s model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(10), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Mitja Steinbacher & Matthias Raddant & Fariba Karimi & Eva Camacho Cuena & Simone Alfarano & Giulia Iori & Thomas Lux, 2021. "Advances in the agent-based modeling of economic and social behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Melguizo Lopez, Isabel, 2019. "Group size and network formation," MPRA Paper 91428, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2021. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    15. Pascal Mossay & Pierre Picard, 2019. "Spatial segregation and urban structure," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 480-507, June.
    16. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of Segregation in Small-World Networks," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Ahmad K. Naimzada & Silvana Stefani & Anna Torriero (ed.), Networks, Topology and Dynamics, pages 111-126, Springer.
    17. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2024. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1149-1174, October.
    18. Boitier, Vincent & Auvray, Emmanuel, 2021. "Schelling paradox in a system of cities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 68-88.
    19. Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen & Sebastian Grauwin, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Post-Print halshs-00404400, HAL.
    20. Florent Dubois & Christophe Muller, 2017. "Segregation and the Perception of the Minority," Working Papers halshs-01520308, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:97:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-024-00667-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.