IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v40y2020i2d10.1007_s10878-020-00592-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination mechanisms for scheduling selfish jobs with favorite machines

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Chen

    (South China University of Technology)

  • Yinfeng Xu

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

Abstract

This paper studies the favorite machine model, where each machine has different speed for different types of jobs. The model is a natural generalization of the two related machines model and captures the features of some real life problems, such as the CPU–GPU task scheduling, the two products scheduling and the cloud computing task scheduling. We are interested in the game-theoretic version of the scheduling problem in which jobs correspond to self-interested users and machines correspond to resources. The goal is to design coordination mechanisms (local policies) with a small price of anarchy (PoA) for the scheduling game of favorite machines. We first analyze the well known Makespan policy for our problem, and provide exact bounds on both the PoA and the strong PoA (SPoA). We also propose a new local policy, called FF-LPT, which outperforms several classical policies (e.g., LPT, SPT, FF-SPT and Makespan) in terms of the PoA, and guarantees fast convergence to a pure Nash equilibrium. Moreover, computational results show that the FF-LPT policy also dominates other policies for random instances, and reveal some insights for practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Chen & Yinfeng Xu, 2020. "Coordination mechanisms for scheduling selfish jobs with favorite machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 333-365, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:40:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-020-00592-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-020-00592-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-020-00592-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-020-00592-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petra Schuurman & Tjark Vredeveld, 2007. "Performance Guarantees of Local Search for Multiprocessor Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 52-63, February.
    2. Deshi Ye & Lin Chen & Guochuan Zhang, 0. "On the price of anarchy of two-stage machine scheduling games," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    3. Chen, Qianqian & Lin, Ling & Tan, Zhiyi & Yan, Yujie, 2017. "Coordination mechanisms for scheduling games with proportional deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 380-389.
    4. Yossi Azar & Lisa Fleischer & Kamal Jain & Vahab Mirrokni & Zoya Svitkina, 2015. "Optimal Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 489-500, June.
    5. Dominik Kress & Sebastian Meiswinkel & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Mechanism design for machine scheduling problems: classification and literature overview," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 583-611, July.
    6. Schuurman, P. & Vredeveld, T., 2005. "Performance guarantees of local search for multiprocessor scheduling," Research Memorandum 055, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    7. Q. Q. Nong & G. Q. Fan & Q. Z. Fang, 2017. "A coordination mechanism for a scheduling game with parallel-batching machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 567-579, February.
    8. Andelman, Nir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Strong price of anarchy," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 289-317, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cong Chen & Yinfeng Xu, 0. "Coordination mechanisms for scheduling selfish jobs with favorite machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    2. Guoqiang Fan & Qingqin Nong, 2018. "A Coordination Mechanism for a Scheduling Game with Uniform-Batching Machines," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Francisco Castillo-Zunino & Pinar Keskinocak, 2021. "Bi-criteria multiple knapsack problem with grouped items," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 747-789, October.
    4. Cole, Richard & Correa, Jose & Gkatzelis, Vasillis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Rosner, Shaul & Tamir, Tami, 2023. "Scheduling games with rank-based utilities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 229-252.
    6. Q. Q. Nong & G. Q. Fan & Q. Z. Fang, 2017. "A coordination mechanism for a scheduling game with parallel-batching machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 567-579, February.
    7. Tobias Harks & Martin Hoefer & Anja Schedel & Manuel Surek, 2021. "Efficient Black-Box Reductions for Separable Cost Sharing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 134-158, February.
    8. Tami Tamir, 2023. "Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 273-301, March.
    9. Rubing Chen & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Single-machine scheduling of proportional-linearly deteriorating jobs with positional due indices," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 177-196, June.
    10. Petra Schuurman & Tjark Vredeveld, 2007. "Performance Guarantees of Local Search for Multiprocessor Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 52-63, February.
    11. Jasper Jong & Marc Uetz, 2020. "The quality of equilibria for set packing and throughput scheduling games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(1), pages 321-344, March.
    12. Le Breton, Michel & Shapoval, Alexander & Weber, Shlomo, 2021. "A game-theoretical model of the landscape theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 41-46.
    13. Chen, Qianqian & Lin, Ling & Tan, Zhiyi & Yan, Yujie, 2017. "Coordination mechanisms for scheduling games with proportional deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 380-389.
    14. Jun-Qiang Wang & Guo-Qiang Fan & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Mixed batch scheduling on identical machines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 487-496, August.
    15. Tobias Brueggemann & Johann L. Hurink & Tjark Vredeveld & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2011. "Exponential size neighborhoods for makespan minimization scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(8), pages 795-803, December.
    16. Šůcha, Přemysl & Agnetis, Alessandro & Šidlovský, Marko & Briand, Cyril, 2021. "Nash equilibrium solutions in multi-agent project scheduling with milestones," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 29-41.
    17. Ruben Juarez & Rajnish Kumar, 2013. "Implementing efficient graphs in connection networks," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 359-403, October.
    18. György Dósa & Leah Epstein, 2019. "Pareto optimal equilibria for selfish bin packing with uniform cost sharing," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 827-847, April.
    19. Yossi Azar & Lisa Fleischer & Kamal Jain & Vahab Mirrokni & Zoya Svitkina, 2015. "Optimal Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 489-500, June.
    20. Braat, Jac & Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Slikker, Marco, 2019. "A selfish allocation heuristic in scheduling: Equilibrium and inefficiency bound analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 634-645.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:40:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-020-00592-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.