IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jbecon/v94y2024i2d10.1007_s11573-023-01165-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making in the capital budgeting context: effects of type of decision aid and increases in information load

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Hartmann

    (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf)

  • Barbara E. Weißenberger

    (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf)

Abstract

This paper sheds light on the question of whether a rules-based or general principles-based decision aid is preferable in the context of increased information load by experimentally investigating how different types of decision aids interact with increases in information load in a structured capital budgeting decision-making task. The experiment employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects design and was run in a course on management control systems with 136 master’s degree students at a German university. Subjects were tasked with reviewing investment proposals that contained differing amounts of information (low vs. high information load, i.e., irrelevant information cues in addition to those relevant for the decision). The second manipulation referred to the type of decision aid—either a detailed, rules-based capital budgeting guideline with clear cut-off rates, or the advice to employ generally accepted criteria for investment decision-making. The dependent variables investigated were perceived task complexity, decision accuracy, and decision confidence. Increases in information load and provision of a decision aid based on general principles led to an increase in perceived task complexity. There was only limited evidence for experimental conditions affecting decision accuracy, but the group of subjects relying on the rules-based capital budgeting guideline reported significantly higher decision confidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Hartmann & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2024. "Decision-making in the capital budgeting context: effects of type of decision aid and increases in information load," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 379-411, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:94:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11573-023-01165-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11573-023-01165-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-023-01165-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11573-023-01165-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:mfppss:eb013598 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marcel van Rinsum & Victor S. Maas & David Stolker, 2018. "Disclosure Checklists and Auditors’ Judgments of Aggressive Accounting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 383-399, March.
    3. Tor Brunzell & Eva Liljeblom & Mika Vaihekoski, 2013. "Determinants of capital budgeting methods and hurdle rates in Nordic firms," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(1), pages 85-110, March.
    4. Snowball, Doug, 1980. "Some effects of accounting expertise and information load: An empirical study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 323-338, July.
    5. Simnett, Roger, 1996. "The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 699-719.
    6. Peter Gordon Roetzel & Burkhard Pedell & Daniel Groninger, 2020. "Information load in escalation situations: combustive agent or counteractive measure?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 757-786, June.
    7. Gero Holthoff & Florian Hoos & Barbara E. Weissenberger, 2015. "Are We Lost in Translation? The Impact of Using Translated IFRS on Decision-Making," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 107-125, June.
    8. Schick, Allen G. & Gordon, Lawrence A. & Haka, Susan, 1990. "Information overload: A temporal approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 199-220.
    9. Glover, SM, 1997. "The influence of time pressure and accountability on auditors' processing of nondiagnostic information," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 213-226.
    10. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-05-2018-0063 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bonner, Sarah E. & Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2002. "The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 303-345.
    12. Dennis Sundvik, 2019. "The impact of principles-based vs rules-based accounting standards on reporting quality and earnings management," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 78-93, May.
    13. Ashton, Rh & Kramer, Ss, 1980. "Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15.
    14. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R., 2001. "The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2-3), pages 187-243, May.
    15. Iselin, Errol R., 1988. "The effects of information load and information diversity on decision quality in a structured decision task," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 147-164, March.
    16. Glen C. Arnold & Panos D. Hatzopoulos, 2000. "The Theory‐Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5‐6), pages 603-626, June.
    17. Blocher, Edward & Moffie, Robert P. & Zmud, Robert W., 1986. "Report format and task complexity: Interaction in risk judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 457-470, October.
    18. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2003. "Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 287-318.
    19. Gregory A. Liyanarachchi, 2007. "Feasibility of using student subjects in accounting experiments: a review," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 47-67, February.
    20. Shields, Michael D., 1980. "Some effects on information load on search patterns used to analyze performance reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 429-442, October.
    21. Hackenbrack, K, 1992. "Implications Of Seemingly Irrelevant Evidence In Audit Judgment," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 126-136.
    22. Koichi Hioki & Eiichiro Suematsu & Hiroshi Miya, 2020. "The interaction effect of quantity and characteristics of accounting measures on performance evaluation," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 305-321, March.
    23. Glen C. Arnold & Panos D. Hatzopoulos, 2000. "The Theory-Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5&6), pages 603-626.
    24. Libby, Robert & Lewis, Barry L., 1977. "Human information processing research in accounting: The state of the art," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 245-268, June.
    25. Wheeler, Patrick & Murthy, Uday, 2011. "Experimental methods in decision aid research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 161-167.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maren Hartmann & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2024. "Information overload research in accounting: a systematic review of the literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1619-1667, September.
    2. Joost Impink & Mari Paananen & Annelies Renders, 2022. "Regulation‐induced Disclosures: Evidence of Information Overload?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(3), pages 432-478, September.
    3. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Peter Gordon Roetzel, 2019. "Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework developmen," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 479-522, December.
    5. Bernhard Hirsch, 2007. "Wertorientiertes Berichtswesen – Theoretisches Konzept versus praktische Umsetzung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 161-185, August.
    6. Sureka, Riya & Kumar, Satish & Colombage, Sisira & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2022. "Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Riya Sureka & Satish Kumar & Deepraj Mukherjee & Christina Theodoraki, 2023. "What restricts SMEs from adopting sophisticated capital budgeting practices?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 265-290, January.
    8. Philémon Rakotonjanahary, 2002. "Caracteristiques De L'Information, Surcharge D'Informations Et Qualite De La Decision," Post-Print halshs-00584525, HAL.
    9. Tomi Rajala, 2019. "Mind the Information Expectation Gap," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 104-125, March.
    10. Gil Cohen & Joseph Yagil, 2010. "Sectorial differences in corporate financial behavior: an international survey," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 245-262.
    11. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2003. "Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 287-318.
    12. Siziba, Simiso & Hall, John Henry, 2021. "The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    13. Peter Markovič & Michal Šinský, 2009. "Trends in application of capital budgeting methods for investment projects evaluation," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1).
    14. Freeman, Mark C., 2009. "The practice of estimating the term structure of discount rates," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 219-234.
    15. Nene Lartey Addico & Godfred Amewu & Anthony Owusu‐Ansah, 2022. "The use of investment decision techniques and tools in practice in a frontier market: Evidence from Ghana," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1748-1763, September.
    16. Ahmad N. H. Anabtawi, 2018. "The Extent of Using and Trusting Capital Budgeting Methods in Projects Appraisal in Palestinian Corporations," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 151-151, June.
    17. Akalu, M.M. & Turner, J.R., 2001. "Investment Appraisal Process," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-78-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Chittenden, Francis & Derregia, Mohsen, 2015. "Uncertainty, irreversibility and the use of ‘rules of thumb’ in capital budgeting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 225-236.
    19. Rajni Mala & Parmod Chand, 2015. "Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-50, March.
    20. Huikku, Jari & Karjalainen, Jouko & Seppälä, Tomi, 2018. "The dynamism of pre-decision controls in the appraisal of strategic investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 516-538.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information overload; Decision-making; Principles- vs. rules-based decision aid; Capital budgeting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:94:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11573-023-01165-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.