IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v16y2019i1d10.1007_s12208-019-00220-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting “the shotgun wedding of industry and academia”—empirical evidence from Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Kati Suomi

    (University of Turku)

  • Päivikki Kuoppakangas

    (Tampere University)

  • Jari Stenvall

    (Tampere University)

  • Elias Pekkola

    (Tampere University)

  • Jussi Kivistö

    (Tampere University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to further our understanding of dilemmas facing the third mission of universities. Through this dilemma-related information, we aim to provide paths for universities to reconcile these dilemmas and adopt a more holistic approach to university marketing. In so doing, we revisit “the shotgun wedding of industry and academia” (Hampden-Turner 1990, pp. 201–221). The dilemmas detected in this study revolve around two pairs, namely: “Highlighting intrinsic value of research vs. highlighting instrumental value of research” and “focusing on international scientific publications vs. focusing on popularization of science”. More than 700 verbal answers given by Finnish doctorates to one pair of open-ended questions were qualitatively content-analysed. As its main novelty, the study adopts dilemma approach and focuses on perceptions of the neglected group of doctorates who have exited academia. The study suggests that universities adopt a more holistic marketing approach by devoting more effort to strengthening stakeholder relationships and co-production and improving science communication and related incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Kati Suomi & Päivikki Kuoppakangas & Jari Stenvall & Elias Pekkola & Jussi Kivistö, 2019. "Revisiting “the shotgun wedding of industry and academia”—empirical evidence from Finland," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(1), pages 81-102, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:16:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-019-00220-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-019-00220-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-019-00220-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-019-00220-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Jordi Molas-Gallart & Elena Castro-Martínez, 2007. "Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ‘Third Mission’ indicators," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 321-330, December.
    3. Kirsi-Mari Kallio & Tomi J. Kallio & Giuseppe Grossi, 2017. "Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 293-300, June.
    4. Irene C. L. Ng & Jeannie Forbes, 2009. "Education as Service: The Understanding of University Experience Through the Service Logic," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 38-64, May.
    5. Rossi, Federica & Rosli, Ainurul & Yip, Nick, 2017. "Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: Evidence from Knowledge Transfer Partnerships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Melodi Guilbault, 2016. "Students as customers in higher education: reframing the debate," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 132-142, July.
    7. Marcelo Gattermann Perin & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Cláudia Simões & Rosiane Pólvora de Pólvora, 2012. "Modeling antecedents of student loyalty in higher education," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 101-116, June.
    8. Katrin Obermeit, 2012. "Students' choice of universities in Germany: structure, factors and information sources used," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 206-230, December.
    9. Mollie Dollinger & Jason Lodge & Hamish Coates, 2018. "Co-creation in higher education: towards a conceptual model," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 210-231, July.
    10. Gregory Trencher & Masafumi Nagao & Chiahsin Chen & Kentaro Ichiki & Tobai Sadayoshi & Mariko Kinai & Mio Kamitani & Shojiro Nakamura & Aiko Yamauchi & Masaru Yarime, 2017. "Implementing Sustainability Co-Creation between Universities and Society: A Typology-Based Understanding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Michela Loi & Maria Chiara Di Guardo, 2015. "The third mission of universities: An investigation of the espoused values," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 855-870.
    12. Ilda Maria Pedro & Luis Nobre Pereira & Hélder Brito Carrasqueira, 2018. "Determinants for the commitment relationship maintenance between the alumni and the alma mater," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 128-152, January.
    13. Lee, Hsing-fen & Miozzo, Marcela & Laredo, Philippe, 2010. "Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 869-881, September.
    14. Dora E. Bock & Sonja Martin Poole & Mathew Joseph, 2014. "Does branding impact student recruitment: a critical evaluation," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 11-21, June.
    15. Riina Koris & Anders Örtenblad & Katri Kerem & Triinu Ojala, 2015. "Student-customer orientation at a higher education institution: the perspective of undergraduate business students," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 29-44, January.
    16. Philippe Larédo & Hsing-Fen Lee & Marcela Miozzo, 2010. "Careers and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knwoledge economy : The case fo graduates from a UK research-based university," Post-Print hal-00583826, HAL.
    17. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hulya Bakirtas & Vildan Gulpinar Demirci, 2022. "A structural evaluation of university identification," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(3), pages 507-531, September.
    2. Carolina Cañibano & Richard Woolley & Eric J. Iversen & Sybille Hinze & Stefan Hornbostel & Jakob Tesch, 2019. "A conceptual framework for studying science research careers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1964-1992, December.
    3. Päivikki Kuoppakangas & Kati Suomi & Jari Stenvall & Elias Pekkola & Jussi Kivistö & Tomi Kallio, 2019. "Revisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management—the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 147-171, December.
    4. Barge-Gil, Andres & D'Este, Pablo & Herrera, Liliana, 2018. "Corporate scientists as the triggers of transitions towards firms' exploration research strategies," MPRA Paper 85415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Mona Fairuz Ramli & Salniza Md. Salleh, 2015. "Factors Contributing to Brand Loyalty towards Malaysia Higher Educational Institutions," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 6(3), pages 22-29.
    6. Tani, Massimiliano, 2020. "The labour market for native and international PhD students: similarities, differences, and the role of (university) employers," GLO Discussion Paper Series 621, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Victoria Galán-Muros & Peter Sijde & Peter Groenewegen & Thomas Baaken, 2017. "Nurture over nature: How do European universities support their collaboration with business?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 184-205, February.
    8. Hayter, Christopher S. & Parker, Marla A., 2019. "Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 556-570.
    9. Päivikki Kuoppakangas & Kati Suomi & Paul Clark & Chris Chapleo & Jari Stenvall, 2020. "Dilemmas in Re-branding a University—“Maybe People Just Don’t Like Change”: Linking Meaningfulness and Mutuality into the Reconciliation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 92-105, May.
    10. Chiara Cant? & Alessandra Tzannis, 2016. "The service innovation in healthcare network," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(4), pages 109-130.
    11. Бекова С. К. & Джафарова З. И., 2019. "Кому В Аспирантуре Жить Хорошо: Связь Трудовой Занятости Аспирантов С Процессом И Результатами Обучения," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 87-108.
    12. De Silva, Muthu & Gokhberg, Leonid & Meissner, Dirk & Russo, Margherita, 2021. "Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Adriana Bin & Sergio Salles-Filho & Luiza Maria Capanema & Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, 2015. "What difference does it make? Impact of peer-reviewed scholarships on scientific production," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1167-1188, February.
    14. Valérie François & Pascal Philippart, 2019. "A university spin-off launch failure: explanation by the legitimation process," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1188-1215, August.
    15. Zhang, Gupeng & Zhou, Jianghua, 2016. "The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 212-222.
    16. Herrera, Liliana & Nieto, Mariano, 2015. "The determinants of firms' PhD recruitment to undertake R&D activities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 132-142.
    17. Francesco Gerli & Veronica Chiodo & Irene Bengo, 2020. "Technology Transfer for Social Entrepreneurship: Designing Problem-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Herrera, Liliana & Nieto, Mariano, 2016. "PhD careers in Spanish industry: Job determinants in manufacturing versus non-manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 341-351.
    19. Luis Rubalcaba, 2022. "Understanding Innovation in Education: A Service Co-Production Perspective," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, April.
    20. de Frutos-Belizón, Jesús & García-Carbonell, Natalia & Ruíz-Martínez, Marta & Sánchez-Gardey, Gonzalo, 2023. "Disentangling international research collaboration in the Spanish academic context: Is there a desirable researcher human capital profile?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:16:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-019-00220-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.