IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intere/v54y2019i4d10.1007_s10272-019-0826-z.html

Data Marketplaces: Trends and Monetisation of Data Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Spiekermann

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISST)

Abstract

Despite the large number of academic contributions, there is no uniform definition of data marketplaces.However, different data marketplaces may vary from eachother in terms of their underlying business model, type ofdata offered, functionality, market mechanisms, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Spiekermann, 2019. "Data Marketplaces: Trends and Monetisation of Data Goods," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 54(4), pages 208-216, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:54:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10272-019-0826-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T Ritchey, 2006. "Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(7), pages 792-801, July.
    2. Stahl, Florian & Schomm, Fabian & Vossen, Gottfried, 2012. "Marketplaces for data: An initial survey," ERCIS Working Papers 14, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    3. Stahl, Florian & Schomm, Fabian & Vossen, Gottfried, 2014. "The data marketplace survey revisited," ERCIS Working Papers 18, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    4. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Leiponen, Aija & Thomas, Llewellyn D W, 2017. "The (Unfulfilled) Potential of Data Marketplaces," ETLA Working Papers 53, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Marra & Vittorio Carlei & Cristiano Baldassari, 2020. "Exploring networks of proximity for partner selection, firms' collaboration and knowledge exchange. The case of clean‐tech industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1034-1044, March.
    2. Wirawan Agahari & Hosea Ofe & Mark Reuver, 2022. "It is not (only) about privacy: How multi-party computation redefines control, trust, and risk in data sharing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1577-1602, September.
    3. Simon Scheider & Florian Lauf & Simon Geller & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2023. "Exploring design elements of personal data markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Marko Palviainen & Ville Kotovirta, 2025. "Strategies for data supply in high-granularity data trade in smart cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Rômy Bergman & Antragama Ewa Abbas & Sven Jung & Claudia Werker & Mark de Reuver, 2022. "Business model archetypes for data marketplaces in the automotive industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 747-765, June.
    6. Winter, Jenifer Sunrise & Davidson, Elizabeth, 2022. "Harmonizing regulatory regimes for the governance of patient-generated health data," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    7. Joan Ofulue & Morad Benyoucef, 2024. "Data monetization: insights from a technology-enabled literature review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 521-565, June.
    8. Haifei Yu & Shanshan Zheng & Hao Wu, 2023. "User Privacy Awareness, Incentive and Data Supply Chain Pricing Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Shrutika Mishra & A R Tripathi & R S Singh & Priyanshu Mishra, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Digital Business Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6666-6705, June.
    10. Marko Palviainen & Juha-Pekka Soininen & Mona Arnold, 2024. "Requirements for water data ecosystems: results from a business ecosystem case study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 994-1018, December.
    11. Rene Abraham & Johannes Schneider & Jan vom Brocke, 2023. "A taxonomy of data governance decision domains in data marketplaces," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Andrea Borsato & André Lorentz, 2023. "Data production and the coevolving AI trajectories: an attempted evolutionary model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1427-1472, November.
    13. Simone Vannuccini & Ekaterina Prytkova, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence’s New Clothes? From General Purpose Technology to Large Technical System," SPRU Working Paper Series 2021-02, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    14. Michael Yang & Ruijiang Gao & Zhiqiang & Zheng, 2025. "Sell Data to AI Algorithms Without Revealing It: Secure Data Valuation and Sharing via Homomorphic Encryption," Papers 2512.06033, arXiv.org.
    15. Teruaki Hayashi & Hiroki Sakaji & Hiroyasu Matsushima & Yoshiaki Fukami & Takumi Shimizu & Yukio Ohsawa, 2021. "Data Combination for Problem-Solving: A Case of an Open Data Exchange Platform," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 521-534, November.
    16. D'Hauwers, Ruben & Vandercruysse, Laurens & Ballon, Pieter, 2025. "Data sovereignty in personal data mobility ecosystems: A business model perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Antragama Ewa Abbas & Thomas van Velzen & Hosea Ofe & Geerten van de Kaa & Anneke Zuiderwijk & Mark de Reuver, 2024. "Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Marcel Fassnacht & Jannis Leimstoll & Carina Benz & Daniel Heinz & Gerhard Satzger, 2024. "Data sharing practices: The interplay of data, organizational structures, and network dynamics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Matthias Förster & Bastian Bansemir & Angela Roth, 2022. "Employee perspectives on value realization from data within data-driven business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 767-806, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan Ngoc Vu & Duc Hong Vo & Michael McAleer, 2019. "Rent seeking for export licenses: Application to the Vietnam rice market," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2019-13, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    2. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    3. Ufuk Akcigit & Murat Celik & Daron Acemoglu, 2014. "Young, Restless and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations," 2014 Meeting Papers 377, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Heine Klaus & Mause Karsten, 2003. "Politikberatung als informationsökonomisches Problem," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 223(4), pages 479-490, August.
    5. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Panayotis Dessyllas & Alan Hughes, 2005. "R&D and Patenting Activity and the Propensity to Acquire in High Technology Industries," Industrial Organization 0507008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Oliver Hinz & Jochen Eckert, 2010. "The Impact of Search and Recommendation Systems on Sales in Electronic Commerce," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(2), pages 67-77, April.
    8. Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "Capital Structure of Foreign Direct Investments: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 389-411, June.
    9. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki, 2004. "Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D - Does Financial Constraint Matter?," Discussion Papers 943, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    10. Paula E. Stephan, 2004. "Robert K. Merton's perspective on priority and the provision of the public good knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(1), pages 81-87, May.
    11. Elie Sadigh, 1996. "Endogenous growth and neoclassical school [Croissance endogène et école néoclassique]," Working Papers hal-01526907, HAL.
    12. Oliver Falck & Johannes Koenen, 2020. "Rohstoff „Daten“: Volkswirtschaflicher Nutzen von Datenbereitstellung – eine Bestandsaufnahme," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 113.
    13. Oliver Falck & Anita Fichtl & Tobias Lohse & Friederike Welter & Heike Belitz & Cedric von der Hellen & Carsten Dreher & Carsten Schwäbe & Dietmar Harhoff & Monika Schnitzer & Uschi Backes-Gellner & C, 2019. "Steuerliche Forschungsförderung: Wichtiger Impuls für FuE-Aktivitäten oder zu wenig zielgerichtet?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(09), pages 03-25, May.
    14. Jarle Moen, 2005. "Is Mobility of Technical Personnel a Source of R&D Spillovers?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 81-114, January.
    15. Peter Grajzl & Stjepan Srhoj & Jaka Cepec & Barbara Mörec, 2024. "A by-product of big government: the attenuating role of public procurement for the effectiveness of grants-based entrepreneurship policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 895-916, March.
    16. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert & Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Joint R and D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    17. Tamer Khraisha & Keren Arthur, 2018. "Can we have a general theory of financial innovation processes? A conceptual review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Yuichi Furukawa & Taro Akiyama, 2006. "Innovation, standardization, and imitation in the product cycle model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(13), pages 1-10.
    19. Diégo Legros & Fabrice Galia, 2012. "Are innovation and R&D the only sources of firms’ knowledge that increase productivity? An empirical investigation of French manufacturing firms," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 167-181, October.
    20. Hans K. Hvide & Benjamin F. Jones, 2018. "University Innovation and the Professor's Privilege," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1860-1898, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:54:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10272-019-0826-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.