Author
Listed:
- Pooria Jafari
(Ghent University)
- Amy Looy
(Ghent University)
Abstract
The growth of today’s digitalization trend goes along with an active and influential role of other fundamental factors in organizational development (e.g., people, processes). Excelling in these factors boosts efficiency and helps achieve strategic goals, for which support is needed. In recent years, studies concentrate on organizational maturity to describe (and sometimes prescribe) how to gradually progress along these factors by means of different maturity levels. However, those studies focus on examining a set of factors influencing maturity (such as the digitalization of work practices), but are not necessarily comprehensive in factors and sometimes fail to offer concrete measurement instruments for various application purposes. Novelty in our study resides in scrutinizing whether a decision tree approach can help organizations in quickly assessing their current maturity level in addition to the conventional ways of maturity model measurement or scale development studies. We select one maturity model (MM) in this domain and build a decision tree to distinguish an organization’s current maturity level of digital work. We also examine our proposed method in two rounds of a field study within a large public sector organization. Our objective is twofold. First, we extend an existing MM in a relevant domain for which a self-assessment instrument is still lacking. Secondly, from a design-science research perspective, we explore an alternative approach to build and test a straightforward self-assessment artefact in order to extend the literature from a methodological point of view. As a result, practitioners can profit from the provided and easy-to-use self-assessment instrument when digitalizing their work practices.
Suggested Citation
Pooria Jafari & Amy Looy, 2025.
"Developing a decision tree to improve a maturity model’s usability: an example for digital work maturity,"
Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 539-576, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:infsem:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-024-00698-8
DOI: 10.1007/s10257-024-00698-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-024-00698-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.