IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v25y2024i1d10.1007_s10799-023-00387-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of operating strategy for a video live streaming platform: advertisement, advertorial, and donation

Author

Listed:
  • Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li

    (National Central University)

  • Jyh-Hwa Liou

    (Feng Chia University)

Abstract

Video live streaming services have reached every corner of the world through the influence of COVID-19. In this study, the business model of a video live streaming platform is examined under a structure in which both a streamer and a platform provider simultaneously have an incentive alignment and a payoff conflict. On the one hand, the streaming platform relies on the efforts of streamers to strengthen its market share; on the other hand, streamers can employ influencer marketing to construct their own additional revenue from commercials, which can affect the sales from the advertisements operated by the platform. In addition, the platform provider can reward talented streamers for their remarkable performance by sharing the subscription revenue with them; however, the adoption of a built-in reward system is perplexing because the platform can levy a commission fee from the money donated to streamers. Combining these practical points, our results indicate that advertorials can still be largely expanded by streamers mastering marketing skills, even if there is high substitution in ad services. In addition, the practice of charging a commission fee from the built-in reward system but sharing the subscription revenue with outstanding streamers can benefit the streaming platform, and their donation loss will be compensated by a higher revenue-sharing ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li & Jyh-Hwa Liou, 2024. "An analysis of operating strategy for a video live streaming platform: advertisement, advertorial, and donation," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 51-68, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00387-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-023-00387-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-023-00387-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-023-00387-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott E. Atkinson & Linda R. Stanley & John Tschirhart, 1988. "Revenue Sharing as an Incentive in an Agency Problem: An example from the National Football League," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 19(1), pages 27-43, Spring.
    2. Ramadan Aly-Tovar & Maya Bacache-Beauvallet & Marc Bourreau & Francois Moreau, 2020. "Why would artists favor free streaming?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 255-280, June.
    3. Yonghong Sun, 2020. "Optimal service versioning for dating platforms," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 217-226, December.
    4. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    5. Carroni, Elias & Paolini, Dimitri, 2020. "Business models for streaming platforms: Content acquisition, advertising and users," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. David A. Soberman, 2004. "Research Note: Additional Learning and Implications on the Role of Informative Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1744-1750, December.
    7. Tåg, Joacim, 2009. "Paying to remove advertisements," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 245-252, November.
    8. Kumar, Subodha & Sethi, Suresh P., 2009. "Dynamic pricing and advertising for web content providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 924-944, September.
    9. Avinash Dixit, 1979. "A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 20-32, Spring.
    10. Skiba, A K, 1978. "Optimal Growth with a Convex-Concave Production Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(3), pages 527-539, May.
    11. Yue Xie & Wanhua He & Wai-Ki Ching & Allen H. Tai & Wai-Hung Ip & Kai-Leung Yung & Na Song, 2020. "Optimal advertising outsourcing strategy with different effort levels and uncertain demand," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2016-2035, April.
    12. Alexandros Karakostas & Axel Sonntag & Daniel John Zizzo, 2017. "Contract Choice: Efficiency and Fairness in Revenue‐Sharing Contracts," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(4), pages 962-986, October.
    13. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    14. Shy, Oz & Stenbacka, Rune, 2003. "Strategic outsourcing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 203-224, February.
    15. Yingxue Zhao & Jiajia Nie & Jing Shao, 2017. "Business strategy analysis for an advertising service supply chain: a study with the publication industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(12), pages 1512-1520, December.
    16. Dietmar Braun & David H Guston, 2003. "Principal-agent theory and research policy: An introduction," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 302-308, October.
    17. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2013. "An economic analysis of online streaming music services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 81-91.
    18. Grace Gu & Feng Zhu, 2021. "Trust and Disintermediation: Evidence from an Online Freelance Marketplace," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 794-807, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margarida Catalão-Lopes, 2002. "Merge or Concentrate? Some Insights for Antitrust Policy," Working Papers w200207, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    2. Manipushpak Mitra & Rupayan Pal & Arindam Paul & P. M. Sharada, 2020. "Equilibrium Coexistence of Public and Private Firms and the Plausibility of Price Competition," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(2), pages 217-242.
    3. H. Phoebe Chan, 2022. "The Welfare Effects of Licensing Product-Differentiating Technology in a Commodity Market," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(4), pages 491-510, June.
    4. Qing Hu & Dan Li & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2024. "Endogenous choice of price or quantity contract with upstream advertising," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 34-51, February.
    5. Parenti, Mathieu & Ushchev, Philip & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2017. "Toward a theory of monopolistic competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 86-115.
    6. Choné, Philippe & Linnemer, Laurent, 2020. "Linear demand systems for differentiated goods: Overview and user’s guide," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Bouckaert, Jan & Van Moer, Geert, 2017. "Horizontal subcontracting and investment in idle dispatchable power plants," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 307-332.
    8. Ming Chang, 2010. "An Asymmetric Oligopolist can Improve Welfare by Raising Price," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 36(1), pages 75-96, February.
    9. Eftichios Sartzetakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2012. "The Role of Information Provision as a Policy Instrument to Supplement Environmental Taxes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 52(3), pages 347-368, July.
    10. Neelanjan Sen & Uday Bhanu Sinha, 2023. "When to merge with a lower quality producer?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 138(2), pages 165-188, March.
    11. Henrik Vetter, 2017. "Commodity taxes and welfare under endogenous market conduct," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 137-154, October.
    12. Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Feichtinger, Gustav & Grass, Dieter & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2011. "Two state capital accumulation with heterogenous products: Disruptive vs. non-disruptive goods," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-478, April.
    13. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2021. "Tax evasion and competition in a differentiated duopoly," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(3), pages 385-411, September.
    14. Häckner, Jonas & Herzing, Mathias, 2016. "Welfare effects of taxation in oligopolistic markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 141-166.
    15. Colombo, Stefano & Scrimitore, Marcella, 2018. "Managerial delegation under capacity commitment: A tale of two sources," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 149-161.
    16. Wei‐Jen Wen & Wen‐Chieh Lee & Chung‐Yen Lo, 2023. "To make or to buy from a common supplier? Strategic considerations and welfare consequences," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(1), pages 39-61, March.
    17. Joachim Heinzel & Simon Hoof, 2020. "Oligopolistic Upstream Competition with Differentiated Inputs," Working Papers CIE 129, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    18. Krzysztof Kosiec, 2016. "Liberalisation of International Trade – The Case of Asymmetric Countries," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(3), pages 143-160, September.
    19. Fanti, Luciano, 2013. "Cross-ownership and unions in a Cournot duopoly: When profits reduce with horizontal product differentiation," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-40.
    20. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2021. "A contribution to the theory of R&D investments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 940, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00387-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.