IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v25y2023i3d10.1007_s10796-022-10286-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authenticity in Objects and Activities: Determinants of Satisfaction with Virtual Reality Experiences of Heritage and Non-Heritage Tourism Sites

Author

Listed:
  • Kichan Nam

    (American University of Sharjah)

  • Christopher S. Dutt

    (Al Rayyan International University College, Doha, Qatar & Emirates Academy of Hospitality Management)

  • Jeff Baker

    (American University of Sharjah)

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) is becoming an increasingly important technology in a host of industries, including tourism. VR can provide virtual experiences before, during, or in lieu of real-world visits to tourism sites. Hence, providing authentic experiences is essential to satisfy guests with the site and technology. This study analyzes survey data using PLS to identify the determinants of satisfaction with non-immersive VR experiences of heritage and non-heritage tourism sites. Results from 193 subjects reveal the linkages between system quality, object-related authenticity, activity-related authenticity, and presence, as well their relationship with satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Kichan Nam & Christopher S. Dutt & Jeff Baker, 2023. "Authenticity in Objects and Activities: Determinants of Satisfaction with Virtual Reality Experiences of Heritage and Non-Heritage Tourism Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1219-1237, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10286-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10286-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-022-10286-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-022-10286-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryce, Derek & Curran, Ross & O'Gorman, Kevin & Taheri, Babak, 2015. "Visitors' engagement and authenticity: Japanese heritage consumption," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 571-581.
    2. Castéran, Herbert & Roederer, Claire, 2013. "Does authenticity really affect behavior? The case of the Strasbourg Christmas Market," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 153-163.
    3. Zhou, Qilou (Bill) & Zhang, Jie & Zhang, Honglei & Ma, Jinhai, 2015. "A structural model of host authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-45.
    4. Tao Zhang & Huijun Wen & Xi Li, 2018. "A Tourist-Based Model of Authenticity of Heritage Sporting Events: The Case of Naadam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Seung Jae Lee, 2017. "A review of audio guides in the era of smart tourism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 705-715, August.
    6. Andrzej Paszkiewicz & Mateusz Salach & Paweł Dymora & Marek Bolanowski & Grzegorz Budzik & Przemysław Kubiak, 2021. "Methodology of Implementing Virtual Reality in Education for Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Kolar, Tomaz & Zabkar, Vesna, 2010. "A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 652-664.
    8. Anne-Sophie V. Radermecker, 2021. "Art and culture in the COVID-19 era: for a consumer-oriented approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Kang, Myunghwa & Gretzel, Ulrike, 2012. "Effects of podcast tours on tourist experiences in a national park," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 440-455.
    10. Guttentag, Daniel A., 2010. "Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 637-651.
    11. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    12. Xi Li & Huawen Shen & Huijun Wen, 2016. "A Study on Tourists Perceived Authenticity towards Experience Quality and Behavior Intention of Cultural Heritage in Macao," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 117-123, August.
    13. Hao Zhang & Taeyoung Cho & Huanjiong Wang & Quansheng Ge, 2018. "The Influence of Cross-Cultural Awareness and Tourist Experience on Authenticity, Tourist Satisfaction and Acculturation in World Cultural Heritage Sites of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Ana M. Domínguez-Quintero & M.Rosario González-Rodríguez & Brendan Paddison, 2020. "The mediating role of experience quality on authenticity and satisfaction in the context of cultural-heritage tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 248-260, January.
    15. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    16. Di Wu & Caiyun Shen & Enxu Wang & Yaoyao Hou & Jun Yang, 2019. "Impact of the Perceived Authenticity of Heritage Sites on Subjective Well-Being: A Study of the Mediating Role of Place Attachment and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Nadeem Akhtar & Nohman Khan & Muhammad Mahroof Khan & Shagufta Ashraf & Muhammad Saim Hashmi & Muhammad Muddassar Khan & Sanil S. Hishan, 2021. "Post-COVID 19 Tourism: Will Digital Tourism Replace Mass Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Wu & Caiyun Shen & Enxu Wang & Yaoyao Hou & Jun Yang, 2019. "Impact of the Perceived Authenticity of Heritage Sites on Subjective Well-Being: A Study of the Mediating Role of Place Attachment and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Tonghao Zhang & Ping Yin & Yuanxiang Peng, 2021. "Effect of Commercialization on Tourists’ Perceived Authenticity and Satisfaction in the Cultural Heritage Tourism Context: Case Study of Langzhong Ancient City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Rickly, Jillian M., 2022. "A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Bryce, Derek & Murdy, Samantha & Alexander, Matthew, 2017. "Diaspora, authenticity and the imagined past," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 49-60.
    5. Wenwen Shang & Qing Yuan & Nan Chen, 2020. "Examining Structural Relationships among Brand Experience, Existential Authenticity, and Place Attachment in Slow Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Tan, Wee-Kheng & Huang, Shih-Yin, 2020. "Why visit theme parks? A leisure constraints and perceived authenticity perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Farrelly, Francis & Kock, Florian & Josiassen, Alexander, 2019. "Cultural heritage authenticity: A producer view," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Pantas H. Silaban & Andri D.K. Silalahi & Edgar Octoyuda & Donita Panjaitan, 2020. "The Role of Authenticity and Satisfaction on Tourists' Revisit Intention at Air Soda Destination," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 365-376.
    9. Zhou, Qilou (Bill) & Zhang, Jie & Zhang, Honglei & Ma, Jinhai, 2015. "A structural model of host authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-45.
    10. Jones, Thomas E. & Yang, Yang & Yamamoto, Kiyotatsu, 2017. "Assessing the recreational value of world heritage site inscription: A longitudinal travel cost analysis of Mount Fuji climbers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 67-78.
    11. Yongjun Su & Junjie Xu & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2021. "Authenticity, Perceived Value and Loyalty in Marine Tourism Destinations: The Case of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Bryce, Derek & Curran, Ross & O'Gorman, Kevin & Taheri, Babak, 2015. "Visitors' engagement and authenticity: Japanese heritage consumption," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 571-581.
    13. Lee, Sean & Sung, Billy & Phau, Ian & Lim, Aaron, 2019. "Communicating authenticity in packaging of Korean cosmetics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 202-214.
    14. Leask, Anna, 2016. "Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 334-361.
    15. Muhammad Hasnain Abbas Naqvi & Yushi Jiang & Mishal Hasnain Naqvi & Miao Miao & Changyong Liang & Shafaqat Mehmood, 2018. "The Effect of Cultural Heritage Tourism on Tourist Word of Mouth: The Case of Lok Versa Festival, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Wu, Shu-Ling & Hsu, Chiu-Ping, 2018. "Role of authenticity in massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPGs): Determinants of virtual item purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 242-249.
    17. Wenwen Lu & Yongjun Su & Sitan Su & Jie Zhao & Li Zhang, 2022. "Perceived Authenticity and Experience Quality in Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism: The Case of Kunqu Opera in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Aqeel Farooq & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Saad Mekhilef & Alex Stojcevski, 2021. "Overview and Exploitation of Haptic Tele-Weight Device in Virtual Shopping Stores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Gyehee Lee & Xiao Lin & Yunseon Choe & Wenya Li, 2021. "In the Eyes of the Beholder: The Effect of the Perceived Authenticity of Sanfang Qixiang in Fuzhou, China, among Locals and Domestic Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Tao Zhang & Huijun Wen & Xi Li, 2018. "A Tourist-Based Model of Authenticity of Heritage Sporting Events: The Case of Naadam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10286-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.