IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i2d10.1007_s13198-024-02646-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Targeted prevention of risky deals for improper granular data with deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Venkatram Kari

    (Tech Mahindra Limited)

  • Geetha Mary Amalanathan

    (Vellore Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Deciding whether to accept or reject business deals is a complex task that traditionally demands considerable time and effort due to multiple attribute evaluations. While machine learning models have improved decision-making in this area, the success of such models heavily depends on data granularity. This paper presents a deep learning approach to enhance risk prediction in deal management by streamlining data granularity. In our experiments on a large dataset with 2 million records, our proposed model achieved an accuracy rate of 94%, outperforming traditional ensemble methods that reached only 76% and optimized models achieving up to 93%. Key metrics for our Artificial Neural Network model demonstrated high reliability, with a specificity of 0.96 for low risk, 0.85 for medium risk, and 0.99 for high risk. Furthermore, our model showed an F1 score of 0.86 for low risk, 0.93 for medium risk, and 0.94 for high risk. These improvements enable businesses to predict and mitigate risks with greater accuracy, ultimately saving time, reducing costs, and improving overall business outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Venkatram Kari & Geetha Mary Amalanathan, 2025. "Targeted prevention of risky deals for improper granular data with deep learning," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(2), pages 750-764, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02646-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02646-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02646-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02646-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcelo Fernandes & Emmanuel Guerre & Eduardo Horta, 2021. "Smoothing Quantile Regressions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 338-357, January.
    2. Hruschka, Harald & Natter, Martin, 1999. "Comparing performance of feedforward neural nets and K-means for cluster-based market segmentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 346-353, April.
    3. Gordon-Hecker, Tom & Pittarello, Andrea & Shalvi, Shaul & Roskes, Marieke, 2020. "Buy-one-get-one-free deals attract more attention than percentage deals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 128-134.
    4. Chun-Hsiung Liao & I Hsieh, 2013. "Determinants of Consumer’s Willingness to Purchase Gray-Market Smartphones," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 409-424, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. YongSeog Kim & W. Nick Street & Gary J. Russell & Filippo Menczer, 2005. "Customer Targeting: A Neural Network Approach Guided by Genetic Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 264-276, February.
    2. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    3. Jean-Jacques Forneron, 2023. "Noisy, Non-Smooth, Non-Convex Estimation of Moment Condition Models," Papers 2301.07196, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    4. Zhaohan Hou & Wei Ma & Lei Wang, 2023. "Sparse and debiased lasso estimation and inference for high-dimensional composite quantile regression with distributed data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1250, December.
    5. Wu, Jianghua & Cheng, Hongya & Li, Luyao, 2024. "Blockchain-enabled downward traceability to combat gray market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Alireza Bashiri Mosavi & Amir Afsar, 2018. "Customer Value Analysis in Banks Using Data Mining and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processes," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 819-840, May.
    7. Anjali Morar & Tinashe Chuchu, 2015. "To Vote or Not To Vote: Marketing Factors Influencing the Voting Intention of University Students in Johannesburg," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(6), pages 81-93.
    8. Wang, Yingjia & Lin, Jiaxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "Gray market and counterfeiting in supply chains: A review of the operations literature and implications to luxury industries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Songnian Chen & Junlong Feng, 2025. "Robust Quantile Factor Analysis," Papers 2501.15761, arXiv.org.
    10. Kean Ming Tan & Lan Wang & Wen‐Xin Zhou, 2022. "High‐dimensional quantile regression: Convolution smoothing and concave regularization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(1), pages 205-233, February.
    11. Alberto Pastore, 2014. "No al falso! Un?indagine esplorativa sulle strategie anti-contraffazione delle fashion firms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 81-102.
    12. Grigory Franguridi & Bulat Gafarov & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2021. "Conditional Quantile Estimators: A Small Sample Theory," CESifo Working Paper Series 9046, CESifo.
    13. Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah & He Wang, 2023. "The Second-order Bias and Mean Squared Error of Quantile Regression Estimators," Working Papers 202313, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    14. Zhang, Qing & Jiang, Xiuqi & Zheng, Yini, 2023. "Blockchain adoption and gray markets in a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. de Castro, Luciano & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kaplan, David M. & Liu, Xin, 2019. "Smoothed GMM for quantile models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 121-144.
    16. Bartosz Uniejewski, 2023. "Smoothing Quantile Regression Averaging: A new approach to probabilistic forecasting of electricity prices," Papers 2302.00411, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    17. Zhang, Xueting & Wang, Feng & Cao, Xia, 2024. "Choose a mobile application or mobile website? Different effects of mobile channels on direct and indirect sales," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Juelin Yin & Ali Quazi, 2018. "Business Ethics in the Greater China Region: Past, Present, and Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 815-835, July.
    19. Y Hayashi & M-H Hsieh & R Setiono, 2009. "Predicting consumer preference for fast-food franchises: a data mining approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(9), pages 1221-1229, September.
    20. Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah & He Wang, 2024. "The second-order bias and mean squared error of quantile regression estimators," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 11-68, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02646-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.