IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i2d10.1007_s13198-022-01691-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model development for assessing inhibitors impacting Industry 4.0 implementation in Indian manufacturing industries: an integrated ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rimalini Gadekar

    (Government Polytechnic)

  • Bijan Sarkar

    (Jadavpur University Kolkata)

  • Ashish Gadekar

    (Amity Institute of Higher Education)

Abstract

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) adoption is becoming predominant in manufacturing industries due to its limitless opportunities. Even though companies are interested in adopting digitalization, several perceived barriers stymied them. However, in the interest of its smooth adoption, these perceived barriers must be addressed urgently. This research aims to analyze the broader spectrum of possible barriers that impede the implementation of I4.0 and converge them into the most prominent inhibitors, further assessing these inhibitors to develop contextual relationships among them. A comprehensive literature review and an empirical research-based survey considering a large sample size are used to address the study’s research objectives. Industry and academia experts’ inputs are considered to derive the I4.0 implementation barrier’s current prominence. The interrelationship among extracted twelve significant inhibitors through principle component analysis (PCA) is modeled using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to manifest each inhibitor’s direct and indirect effect. Fuzzy matriced’ impacts croise’s multiplication applique’e a’ un classement (MICMAC) analysis is further considered to classify these inhibitors into drivers and dependents. The study depicts inadequate organizational strategies, uncertainty about financial decision making, limited employee readiness, inconsistent legal and government policies, Insufficient IT and automation infrastructure as the most prominent driver inhibitors of the I4.0 adoption. An integrated novel PCA-ISM Fuzzy MICMAC model developed in this research paper is unique and used for the first time to establish the hierarchical relationship among I4.0 implementation inhibitors considering the post-COVID-19 scenario. This study offers practical insights and outcomes that will help researchers, decision-makers, and practitioners in unlocking the potential of I4.0 by dealing with its inhibitors efficaciously.

Suggested Citation

  • Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2024. "Model development for assessing inhibitors impacting Industry 4.0 implementation in Indian manufacturing industries: an integrated ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(2), pages 646-671, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01691-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-022-01691-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-022-01691-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-022-01691-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Yongxin Liao & Fernando Deschamps & Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures & Luiz Felipe Pierin Ramos, 2017. "Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3609-3629, June.
    3. Anish Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Pradeep Kumar, 2022. "Barriers for adoption of Industry 4.0 in sustainable food supply chain: a circular economy perspective," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 73(2), pages 385-411, February.
    4. Müller, Julian Marius & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2018. "Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 2-17.
    5. Tomomi Hamada, 2019. "Determinants of Decision-Makers’ Attitudes toward Industry 4.0 Adaptation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Vijay Victor & Jose Joy Thoppan & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Fekete Farkas Maria, 2018. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior and Prospective Purchase Decisions in a Dynamic Pricing Environment—An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Leng, Jiewu & Ruan, Guolei & Jiang, Pingyu & Xu, Kailin & Liu, Qiang & Zhou, Xueliang & Liu, Chao, 2020. "Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Vernika Agarwal & Kaliyan Mathiyazhagan & Snigdha Malhotra & Tarik Saikouk, 2021. "Analysis of challenges in sustainable human resource management due to disruptions by Industry 4.0: an emerging economy perspective," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 513-541, August.
    9. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Alfred Theorin & Kristofer Bengtsson & Julien Provost & Michael Lieder & Charlotta Johnsson & Thomas Lundholm & Bengt Lennartson, 2017. "An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1297-1311, March.
    11. Hendrik S. Birkel & Johannes W. Veile & Julian M. Müller & Evi Hartmann & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Shailendra Kumar & Mohd. Suhaib & Mohammad Asjad, 2020. "Narrowing the barriers to Industry 4.0 practices through PCA-Fuzzy AHP-K means," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 200-226, August.
    13. Chung, Minjee & Ko, Eunju & Joung, Heerim & Kim, Sang Jin, 2020. "Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 587-595.
    14. Vineet Jain & Puneeta Ajmera, 2020. "Modelling the enablers of industry 4.0 in the Indian manufacturing industry," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(6), pages 1233-1262, June.
    15. Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Vukašin Kuč & Veljko M. Mijušković & Tomislav Herceg, 2020. "Challenges and Driving Forces for Industry 4.0 Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Jan Stentoft & Christopher Rajkumar, 2020. "The relevance of Industry 4.0 and its relationship with moving manufacturing out, back and staying at home," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2953-2973, May.
    17. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    18. Shailendra Kumar & Mohd. Suhaib & Mohammad Asjad, 2020. "Narrowing the barriers to Industry 4.0 practices through PCA-Fuzzy AHP-K means," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 200-226, August.
    19. Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Tortorella, Guilherme, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Rajdeep Singh & Neeraj Bhanot, 2020. "An integrated DEMATEL-MMDE-ISM based approach for analysing the barriers of IoT implementation in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 2454-2476, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Veepan Kumar & Prem Vrat & Ravi Shankar, 2021. "Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in Industry 4.0: a hybrid MCDM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(3), pages 711-750, September.
    4. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Donnelly, Oisin & Sar, Kubra & Wang, Chao & Azadnia, Amir Hossein, 2022. "The successful implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing: An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Narula, Sanjiv & Audretsch, David & Puppala, Harish & Kumar, Anil, 2022. "Adopting new technology is a distant dream? The risks of implementing Industry 4.0 in emerging economy SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Caiming Zhang & Yong Chen & Hong Chen & Dazhi Chong, 2024. "Industry 4.0 and its Implementation: a Review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1773-1783, October.
    8. Sony, Michael & Antony, Jiju & Mc Dermott, Olivia & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, 2021. "An empirical examination of benefits, challenges, and critical success factors of industry 4.0 in manufacturing and service sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    10. Muawia Ramadan & Tariq Amer & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "The Impact of Integration of Industry 4.0 and Internal Organizational Forces on Sustaining Competitive Advantages and Achieving Strategic Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Voigt, Kai-Ingo & Müller, Julian & Veile, Johannes & Schmidt, Marie-Christin, 2019. "Sharing information across company borders in industry 4.0," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Supply Chain Management: Innovative Approaches for Supply Chains. Proceedings of the Hamburg Int, volume 27, pages 57-85, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    12. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Yang Lu, 2025. "The Current Status and Developing Trends of Industry 4.0: a Review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 215-234, February.
    14. Ricci, Riccardo & Battaglia, Daniele & Neirotti, Paolo, 2021. "External knowledge search, opportunity recognition and industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Bartoloni, Sara & Calò, Ernesto & Marinelli, Luca & Pascucci, Federica & Dezi, Luca & Carayannis, Elias & Revel, Gian Marco & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    16. Dwivedi, Ashish & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & de Carvalho, Daniel Estima, 2022. "Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Roland Zs. Szabo & Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Robert Hanák & Lilla Hortovanyi & Anita Romanová & Marian Mocan & Dragan Djuričin, 2020. "Industry 4.0 Implementation in B2B Companies: Cross-Country Empirical Evidence on Digital Transformation in the CEE Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Teixeira, Josélia Elvira & Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa C.P., 2022. "Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2022. "Key performance indicator based dynamic decision-making framework for sustainable Industry 4.0 implementation risks evaluation: reference to the Indian manufacturing industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 189-249, November.
    20. Virmani, Naveen & Sharma, Shikha & Kumar, Anil & Luthra, Sunil, 2023. "Adoption of industry 4.0 evidence in emerging economy: Behavioral reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01691-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.