IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v11y2021i1d10.1186_s13561-021-00315-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Gintare Valentelyte

    (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
    Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland)

  • Conor Keegan

    (Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI))

  • Jan Sorensen

    (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland)

Abstract

Background Activity-Based Funding (ABF) has been implemented across many countries as a means to incentivise efficient hospital care delivery and resource use. Previous reviews have assessed the impact of ABF implementation on a range of outcomes across health systems. However, no comprehensive review of the methods used to generate this evidence has been undertaken. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the analytical methods employed in research on ABF hospital performance outcomes. Methods We conducted a scoping review in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Five academic databases and reference lists of included studies were used to identify studies assessing the impact of ABF on hospital performance outcomes. Peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 2000 and 2019 considering ABF implementation outside the U.S. were included. Qualitative studies, policy discussions and commentaries were excluded. Abstracts and full text studies were double screened to ensure consistency. All analytical approaches and their relative strengths and weaknesses were charted and summarised. Results We identified 19 studies that assessed hospital performance outcomes from introduction of ABF in England, Korea, Norway, Portugal, Israel, the Netherlands, Canada, Italy, Japan, Belgium, China, and Austria. Quasi-experimental methods were used across most reviewed studies. The most commonly used assessment methods were different forms of interrupted time series analyses. Few studies used difference-in-differences or similar methods to compare outcome changes over time relative to comparator groups. The main hospital performance outcome measures examined were case numbers, length of stay, mortality and readmission. Conclusions Non-experimental study designs continue to be the most widely used method in the assessment of ABF impacts. Quasi-experimental approaches examining the impact of ABF implementation on outcomes relative to comparator groups not subject to the reform should be applied where possible to facilitate identification of effects. These approaches provide a more robust evidence-base for informing future financing reform and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gintare Valentelyte & Conor Keegan & Jan Sorensen, 2021. "Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-021-00315-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-021-00315-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-021-00315-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-021-00315-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Street, Andrew & Maynard, Alan, 2007. "Activity based financing in England: the need for continual refinement of payment by results," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 419-427, October.
    2. Martinussen, Pã…L E. & Hagen, Terje P., 2009. "Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: Evidence from day surgery in Norway," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 139-158, April.
    3. Gaughan, James & Gutacker, Nils & Grašič, Katja & Kreif, Noemi & Siciliani, Luigi & Street, Andrew, 2019. "Paying for efficiency: Incentivising same-day discharges in the English NHS," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Theurl, Engelbert & Winner, Hannes, 2007. "The impact of hospital financing on the length of stay: Evidence from Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 375-389, August.
    5. Andrew Street & Kirsi Vitikainen & Afsaneh Bjorvatn & Anne Hvenegaard, 2007. "Introducing activity-based financing: a review of experience in Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden," Working Papers 030cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    6. C. E. Dismuke & P. Guimaraes, 2002. "Has the caveat of case-mix based payment influenced the quality of inpatient hospital care in Portugal?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(10), pages 1301-1307.
    7. Brick, Aoife & Nolan, Anne & O'Reilly, Jacqueline & Smith, Samantha, 2010. "Resource Allocation, Financing and Sustainability in the Health Sector," Papers RB2010/3/1, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jurgita Januleviciute & Jan Erik Askildsen & Oddvar Kaarboe & Luigi Siciliani & Matt Sutton, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 620-636, May.
    2. Socha, Karolina, 2014. "Mixed reimbursement of hospitals: Securing high activity and global expenditures control?," DaCHE discussion papers 2014:3, University of Southern Denmark, Dache - Danish Centre for Health Economics.
    3. Zeynep Or & Thomas Renaud & Laure Com-Ruelle, 2009. "One price for all? Sources of cost variations between public and private hospitals," Working Papers DT25, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised May 2009.
    4. Zeynep Or & Thomas Renaud, 2009. "Activity based payment in hospitals: Principles and issues drawn from the economic literature and country experiences," Working Papers DT23, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Mar 2009.
    5. Mads Leth Felsager Jakobsen & Thomas Pallesen, 2017. "Performance Budgeting in Practice: the Case of Danish Hospital Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 255-273, June.
    6. Parida Wubulihasimu & Werner Brouwer & Pieter van Baal, 2016. "The Impact of Hospital Payment Schemes on Healthcare and Mortality: Evidence from Hospital Payment Reforms in OECD Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(8), pages 1005-1019, August.
    7. Li Wu & Conghua Ji & Hanti Lu & Xuewen Hong & Shan Liu & Ying Zhang & Qiushuang Li & Sijia Huang & Penglei Zhou & Jiong Yao & Yuxiu Hu, 2018. "Standardization of medical service indicators: A useful technique for hospital administration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Nolan, Anne, 2019. "Reforming the delivery of public dental services in Ireland: potential cost implications," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS80, June.
    9. Laudicella, Mauro & Olsen, Kim Rose & Street, Andrew, 2010. "Examining cost variation across hospital departments-a two-stage multi-level approach using patient-level data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1872-1881, November.
    10. Carine Milcent, 2016. "Upcoding and heterogeneity in hospitals’ response: A Natural Experiment," PSE Working Papers halshs-01340557, HAL.
    11. Li‐Lin Liang, 2015. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Group‐Based Payments Incentivise Hospitals to Adjust Output Mix?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 454-469, April.
    12. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2017. "The political economy of diagnosis-related groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 38-47.
    13. Sara Jamalabadi & Vera Winter & Jonas Schreyögg, 2020. "A Systematic Review of the Association Between Hospital Cost/price and the Quality of Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 625-639, October.
    14. Richard Layte & Anne Nolan, 2015. "Eligibility for free GP care and the utilisation of GP services by children in Ireland," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 3-27, March.
    15. Martin Gaynor & Rodrigo Moreno-Serra & Carol Propper, 2013. "Death by Market Power: Reform, Competition, and Patient Outcomes in the National Health Service," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 134-166, November.
    16. Papanicolas, Irene & McGuire, Alistair, 2015. "Do financial incentives trump clinical guidance? Hip Replacement in England and Scotland," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 25-36.
    17. Fulop, Naomi & Walters, Rhiannon & 6, Perri & Spurgeon, Peter, 2012. "Implementing changes to hospital services: Factors influencing the process and ‘results’ of reconfiguration," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 128-135.
    18. Bazyli Czyżewski & Anna Hnatyszyn-Dzikowska & Jan Polcyn, 2016. "Problems of Quantifying Public Goods in the Healthcare Sector," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 105-125.
    19. Conor Keegan & Aoife Brick & Edward Henry & Adele Bergin, 2022. "Projected private hospital expenditure in Ireland, 2018–2035: What role for demographics, cost, and Sláintecare?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 999-1017, March.
    20. Kjøstolfsen, Gjertrud Hole & Baheerathan, Janusha & Martinussen, Pål E. & Magnussen, Jon, 2021. "Financial incentives and patient selection: Hospital physicians’ views on cream skimming and economic management focus in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 98-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:11:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-021-00315-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.