IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v4y2009i02p139-158_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: Evidence from day surgery in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • MARTINUSSEN, PÃ…L E.
  • HAGEN, TERJE P.

Abstract

Cream skimming can be defined as the selective treatment of patients that demand few resources while providing high economic refunds. We test whether cream skimming occurs after the introduction of DRG-based activity-based financing (ABF) in Norway in 1997 and if the problem further increased after the 2002 organizational reform when hospitals were turned into trusts. The DRG-system offers the same economic reimbursement for patients classified within day-surgical DRGs irrespective of whether the patient receives same-day treatment or in-patient care over several days. This provides potential for cream skimming and allows us to investigate cream skimming within the actual diagnoses. Patient data from the period 1999-2005 is analyzed. Waiting times are used as indicators of patient selection and analyzed as a function of severity within each diagnosis, controlling for age and gender of the patient, as well as institutional and time-dependent variables. The analysis gives some evidence of cream skimming in the first period of ABF, in particular within the lighter orthopaedic diagnoses. However, cream skimming does not increase after the 2002 organizational reform but is stable, and for some DRGs even reduced. The study indicates that cream skimming may occur if reimbursement systems are not particularly sophisticated. Softening of budget constraints after the hospital reform of 2002 may explain why cream skimming does not increase after the reform. However, further investigation into this mechanism is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinussen, Pã…L E. & Hagen, Terje P., 2009. "Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: Evidence from day surgery in Norway," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 139-158, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:4:y:2009:i:02:p:139-158_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133109004812/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kondo, Akiko & Kawabuchi, Koichi, 2012. "Evaluation of the introduction of a diagnosis procedure combination system for patient outcome and hospitalisation charges for patients with hip fracture or lung cancer in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 184-193.
    2. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2017. "The political economy of diagnosis-related groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 38-47.
    3. Kjøstolfsen, Gjertrud Hole & Baheerathan, Janusha & Martinussen, Pål E. & Magnussen, Jon, 2021. "Financial incentives and patient selection: Hospital physicians’ views on cream skimming and economic management focus in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 98-103.
    4. Melberg, Hans Olav & Pedersen, Kine, 2015. "Do changes in reimbursement fees affect hospital prioritization?," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2015:1, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    5. Aleksandar Medarević & Dejana Vuković, 2021. "Efficiency and Productivity of Public Hospitals in Serbia Using DEA-Malmquist Model and Tobit Regression Model, 2015–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Alexander Geissler & David Scheller‐Kreinsen & Wilm Quentin & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups Appropriately Explain Variations In Costs And Length Of Stay Of Hip Replacement? A Comparative Assessment Of Drg Systems Across 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 103-115, August.
    7. Jurgita Januleviciute & Jan Erik Askildsen & Oddvar Kaarboe & Luigi Siciliani & Matt Sutton, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 620-636, May.
    8. Li‐Lin Liang, 2015. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Group‐Based Payments Incentivise Hospitals to Adjust Output Mix?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 454-469, April.
    9. Shuli Brammli-Greenberg & Sharvit Fialco & Neria Shtauber & Yoram Weiss, 2023. "Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(4), pages 539-556, June.
    10. Tania Stafinski & Devidas Menon & Deborah Marshall & Timothy Caulfield, 2011. "Societal Values in the Allocation of Healthcare Resources," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 4(4), pages 207-225, December.
    11. Yang, Ou & Chan, Marc K. & Cheng, Terence C. & Yong, Jongsay, 2020. "Cream skimming: Theory and evidence from hospital transfers and capacity utilization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 68-87.
    12. Melberg, Hans Olav & Beck Olsen, Camilla & Pedersen, Kine, 2016. "Did hospitals respond to changes in weights of Diagnosis Related Groups in Norway between 2006 and 2013?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 992-1000.
    13. Socha, Karolina Z. & Bech, Mickael, 2011. "Physician dual practice: A review of literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 1-7, September.
    14. Socha, Karolina, 2010. "Physician dual practice and the public health care provision. Review of the literature," DaCHE discussion papers 2010:4, University of Southern Denmark, Dache - Danish Centre for Health Economics.
    15. David Scheller‐Kreinsen & on behalf of the EuroDRG group, 2012. "How Well Do Diagnosis‐Related Group Systems Group Breast Cancer Surgery Patients?—Evidence From 10 European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S2), pages 41-54, August.
    16. Gavurová, Beáta & Klepáková, Adela & Ivančová, Ladislava, 2013. "Day Surgery Development Aspects in Slovakia/Aspectos del desarrollo potencial de cirugía ambulatoria en Eslovaquia," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 477-496, Septiembr.
    17. Gintare Valentelyte & Conor Keegan & Jan Sorensen, 2021. "Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:4:y:2009:i:02:p:139-158_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.