IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v36y2024i2d10.1007_s10696-023-09495-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train maintenance personnel shift scheduling: case study

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammed Abdullah Gençer

    (Kırıkkale University)

  • Tamer Eren

    (Kırıkkale University)

  • Hacı Mehmet Alakaş

    (Kırıkkale University)

Abstract

In this study, the shift scheduling problem of the personnel who maintain the 324 trains operating on the lines of the Ankara Metro, which carry approximately 10 million passengers per month, is discussed. In the problem, daily personnel needs and personnel qualifications are evaluated together according to the fault prediction. Firstly, a total of 1721 fault data for 181 days is analyzed, and the prediction is made according to 8 prediction methods. Then, a 30-day fault prediction is made with the prediction method, which has the least error rate. According to the number of faults obtained as a result of the prediction, the daily personnel requirement is determined. Then, according to the type of fault, the personnel are classified as electronics, electromechanics, and mechanics. It is aimed at distributing the personnel evenly to the shifts. The goal programming model is used to solve the problem, allowing us to add more than one goal to the model. When the solution results of the problem are compared with the current schedule, it is seen that the monthly total working hours are distributed equally, and the shifts are distributed fairly, and a necessary balance is achieved in the shifts according to the personnel qualifications. It is thought that this study, in which personnel qualifications and fault prediction are evaluated together, will contribute to the literature on railway maintenance personnel scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammed Abdullah Gençer & Tamer Eren & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş, 2024. "Train maintenance personnel shift scheduling: case study," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 533-566, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:36:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10696-023-09495-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-023-09495-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-023-09495-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-023-09495-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Bruecker, Philippe & Beliën, Jeroen & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2018. "A three-stage mixed integer programming approach for optimizing the skill mix and training schedules for aircraft maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 439-452.
    2. M. Pour, Shahrzad & Drake, John H. & Ejlertsen, Lena Secher & Rasmussen, Kourosh Marjani & Burke, Edmund K., 2018. "A hybrid Constraint Programming/Mixed Integer Programming framework for the preventive signaling maintenance crew scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 341-352.
    3. Chia-Hung Chen & Shangyao Yan & Miawjane Chen, 2010. "Short-term manpower planning for MRT carriage maintenance under mixed deterministic and stochastic demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 67-88, December.
    4. Peng, Fan & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Track maintenance production team scheduling in railroad networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1474-1488.
    5. De Bruecker, Philippe & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2015. "A model enhancement heuristic for building robust aircraft maintenance personnel rosters with stochastic constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 661-673.
    6. Li, Yulong & Zhang, Chi & Jia, Chuanzhou & Li, Xiaodong & Zhu, Yimin, 2019. "Joint optimization of workforce scheduling and routing for restoring a disrupted critical infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Shahrzad M. Pour & Kourosh Marjani Rasmussen & John H. Drake & Edmund K. Burke, 2019. "A constructive framework for the preventive signalling maintenance crew scheduling problem in the Danish railway system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(11), pages 1965-1982, November.
    8. Ashish K. Nemani & Suat Bog & Ravindra K. Ahuja, 2010. "Solving the Curfew Planning Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 506-523, November.
    9. Huisman, Dennis, 2007. "A column generation approach for the rail crew re-scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 163-173, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Aarabi, Fatemeh & Batta, Rajan, 2020. "Scheduling spatially distributed jobs with degradation: Application to pothole repair," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Qin, Yichen & Ng, Kam K.H., 2023. "Analysing the impact of collaborations between airlines and maintenance service company under MRO outsourcing mode: Perspective from airline's operations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Wang, Jiaxi, 2024. "Maintenance scheduling at high-speed train depots: An optimization approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Hyun Jun Yang & Suk Jae Jeong & Sung Wook Yoon, 2020. "Enhancement for human resource management in the ULD build-up process of air-cargo terminal: a strategic linkage approach," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 301-333, April.
    6. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Verhaegh, T. & Huisman, D. & Fioole, P-J. & Vera, J.C., 2016. "A heuristic for real-time crew rescheduling during small disruptions," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-09, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Hilbert Snijders & Ricardo L. Saldanha, 2017. "Decision support for scheduling security crews at Netherlands Railways," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 193-215, July.
    9. M. Pour, Shahrzad & Drake, John H. & Ejlertsen, Lena Secher & Rasmussen, Kourosh Marjani & Burke, Edmund K., 2018. "A hybrid Constraint Programming/Mixed Integer Programming framework for the preventive signaling maintenance crew scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 341-352.
    10. Deng, Qichen & Santos, Bruno F., 2022. "Lookahead approximate dynamic programming for stochastic aircraft maintenance check scheduling optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 814-833.
    11. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A resilience-based framework for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. Si, Guojin & Xia, Tangbin & Gebraeel, Nagi & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2022. "A reliability-and-cost-based framework to optimize maintenance planning and diverse-skilled technician routing for geographically distributed systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.
    14. Fei Peng & Xian Fan & Puxin Wang & Mingan Sheng, 2022. "A Time-Space Network-Based Optimization Method for Scheduling Depot Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Changjiu Li & Yong Zhang & Xichao Su & Xinwei Wang, 2022. "An Improved Optimization Algorithm for Aeronautical Maintenance and Repair Task Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Xu, Min & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Resilience-driven post-disaster restoration of interdependent infrastructure systems under different decision-making environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Perumal, Shyam S.G. & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper, 2022. "Electric bus planning & scheduling: A review of related problems and methodologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 395-413.
    18. Peng, Fan & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Track maintenance production team scheduling in railroad networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1474-1488.
    19. Jia, Chuanzhou & Zhang, Chi & Li, Yan-Fu & Li, Quan-Lin, 2023. "Joint pre- and post-disaster planning to enhance the resilience of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Mark M. Dekker & Rolf N. Lieshout & Robin C. Ball & Paul C. Bouman & Stefan C. Dekker & Henk A. Dijkstra & Rob M. P. Goverde & Dennis Huisman & Debabrata Panja & Alfons A. M. Schaafsma & Marjan Akker, 2022. "A next step in disruption management: combining operations research and complexity science," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:36:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10696-023-09495-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.