IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v17y2013i3p535-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust utility maximization for a diffusion market model with misspecified coefficients

Author

Listed:
  • Revaz Tevzadze
  • Teimuraz Toronjadze
  • Tamaz Uzunashvili

Abstract

The paper studies the robust maximization of utility from terminal wealth in a diffusion financial market model. The underlying model consists of a tradable risky asset whose price is described by a diffusion process with misspecified trend and volatility coefficients, and a non-tradable asset with a known parameter. The robust functional is defined in terms of a utility function. An explicit characterization of the solution is given via the solution of the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs (HJBI) equation. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Revaz Tevzadze & Teimuraz Toronjadze & Tamaz Uzunashvili, 2013. "Robust utility maximization for a diffusion market model with misspecified coefficients," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 535-563, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:535-563
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-012-0199-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-012-0199-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-012-0199-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Karatzas & Jaksa Cvitanic, 1999. "On dynamic measures of risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 451-482.
    2. N. Lazrieva & T. Toronjadze, 2008. "Optimal Robust Mean-Variance Hedging in Incomplete Financial Markets," Papers 0805.0122, arXiv.org.
    3. Hernández-Hernández Daniel & Schied Alexander, 2006. "Robust utility maximization in a stochastic factor model," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1/2006), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Ralf Korn & Olaf Menkens, 2005. "Worst-Case Scenario Portfolio Optimization: a New Stochastic Control Approach," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 62(1), pages 123-140, September.
    5. Anne Gundel, 2005. "Robust utility maximization for complete and incomplete market models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 151-176, April.
    6. Hernández-Hernández, Daniel & Schied, Alexander, 2007. "A control approach to robust utility maximization with logarithmic utility and time-consistent penalties," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 117(8), pages 980-1000, August.
    7. Touzi, Nizar, 2000. "Direct characterization of the value of super-replication under stochastic volatility and portfolio constraints," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 305-328, August.
    8. Alexander Schied, 2008. "Robust optimal control for a consumption-investment problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(1), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Denis Talay & Ziyu Zheng, 2002. "Worst case model risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 517-537.
    10. Hyungsok Ahn & Adviti Muni & Glen Swindle, 1999. "Optimal hedging strategies for misspecified asset price models," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 197-208.
    11. Tevzadze, Revaz, 2008. "Solvability of backward stochastic differential equations with quadratic growth," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 503-515, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. Cong & C. W. Oosterlee, 2017. "On Robust Multi-Period Pre-Commitment And Time-Consistent Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Hu, Mingshang & Ji, Shaolin, 2017. "Dynamic programming principle for stochastic recursive optimal control problem driven by a G-Brownian motion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 107-134.
    3. Huy N. Chau & Miklos Rasonyi, 2018. "Robust utility maximization in markets with transaction costs," Papers 1803.04213, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    4. Huyên Pham & Xiaoli Wei & Chao Zhou, 2021. "Portfolio diversification and model uncertainty: a robust dynamic mean-variance approach," Working Papers hal-01867133, HAL.
    5. Bogdan Iftimie, 2023. "A robust investment-consumption optimization problem in a switching regime interest rate setting," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 713-739, July.
    6. Ariel Neufeld & Julian Sester & Mario Šikić, 2023. "Markov decision processes under model uncertainty," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 618-665, July.
    7. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2021. "Duality theory for robust utility maximisation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 469-503, July.
    8. Huy N. Chau & Miklós Rásonyi, 2019. "Robust utility maximisation in markets with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 677-696, July.
    9. Huyen Pham & Xiaoli Wei & Chao Zhou, 2018. "Portfolio diversification and model uncertainty: a robust dynamic mean-variance approach," Papers 1809.01464, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.
    10. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    11. Wing Fung Chong & Gechun Liang, 2018. "Optimal investment and consumption with forward preferences and uncertain parameters," Papers 1807.01186, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    12. Xu, Yuhong, 2022. "Optimal growth under model uncertainty," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Dirk Becherer & Klebert Kentia, 2017. "Good Deal Hedging and Valuation under Combined Uncertainty about Drift and Volatility," Papers 1704.02505, arXiv.org.
    14. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2015. "Stochastic Target Games and Dynamic Programming via Regularized Viscosity Solutions," Post-Print hal-00846830, HAL.
    15. Guohui Guan & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song, 2022. "The continuous-time pre-commitment KMM problem in incomplete markets," Papers 2210.13833, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    16. Ariel Neufeld & Marcel Nutz, 2015. "Robust Utility Maximization with L\'evy Processes," Papers 1502.05920, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    17. Ariel Neufeld & Mario Šikić, 2019. "Nonconcave robust optimization with discrete strategies under Knightian uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(2), pages 229-253, October.
    18. Tim Leung & Hyungbin Park & Heejun Yeo, 2023. "Robust Long-Term Growth Rate of Expected Utility for Leveraged ETFs," Papers 2310.02084, arXiv.org.
    19. Daniel Bartl & Ariel Neufeld & Kyunghyun Park, 2023. "Sensitivity of robust optimization problems under drift and volatility uncertainty," Papers 2311.11248, arXiv.org.
    20. Zongxia Liang & Ming Ma, 2020. "Robust consumption‐investment problem under CRRA and CARA utilities with time‐varying confidence sets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1035-1072, July.
    21. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2016. "Stochastic Target Games and Dynamic Programming via Regularized Viscosity Solutions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 109-124, February.
    22. Ariel Neufeld & Mario Sikic, 2016. "Robust Utility Maximization in Discrete-Time Markets with Friction," Papers 1610.09230, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogdan Iftimie, 2023. "A robust investment-consumption optimization problem in a switching regime interest rate setting," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 713-739, July.
    2. Alexander Schied, 2008. "Robust optimal control for a consumption-investment problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(1), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Alexander Schied, 2007. "Robust Optimal Control for a Consumption-investment Problem," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-026, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    4. Frank Thomas Seifried, 2010. "Optimal Investment for Worst-Case Crash Scenarios: A Martingale Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 559-579, August.
    5. Leitner Johannes, 2005. "Optimal portfolios with expected loss constraints and shortfall risk optimal martingale measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 49-66, January.
    6. Thomas Knispel, 2012. "Asymptotics of robust utility maximization," Papers 1203.1191, arXiv.org.
    7. Daniel Hern'andez-Hern'andez & Leonel P'erez-Hern'andez, 2012. "Robust utility maximization for L\'evy processes: Penalization and solvability," Papers 1206.0715, arXiv.org.
    8. Juan Li & Wenqiang Li & Gechun Liang, 2020. "A game theoretical approach to homothetic robust forward investment performance processes in stochastic factor models," Papers 2005.10660, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    9. Guohui Guan & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song, 2022. "The continuous-time pre-commitment KMM problem in incomplete markets," Papers 2210.13833, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    10. Xiaoxian Ma & Qingzhen Zhao & Jilin Qu, 2008. "Robust portfolio optimization with a generalized expected utility model under ambiguity," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 431-444, October.
    11. Wiebke Wittmüß, 2006. "Robust Optimization of Consumption with Random Endowment," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2006-063, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    12. Owari, Keita & 尾張, 圭太, 2008. "Robust Exponential Hedging and Indifference Valuation," Discussion Papers 2008-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Zongxia Liang & Ming Ma, 2020. "Robust consumption‐investment problem under CRRA and CARA utilities with time‐varying confidence sets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1035-1072, July.
    14. Sascha Desmettre & Sebastian Merkel & Annalena Mickel & Alexander Steinicke, 2023. "Worst-Case Optimal Investment in Incomplete Markets," Papers 2311.10021, arXiv.org.
    15. Alexander Schied, 2007. "Optimal investments for risk- and ambiguity-averse preferences: a duality approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 107-129, January.
    16. Zhou Yang & Gechun Liang & Chao Zhou, 2017. "Constrained portfolio-consumption strategies with uncertain parameters and borrowing costs," Papers 1711.02939, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    17. Sigrid Kallblad, 2013. "Risk- and ambiguity-averse portfolio optimization with quasiconcave utility functionals," Papers 1311.7419, arXiv.org.
    18. Sigrid Kallblad & Jan Obloj & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2013. "Time--consistent investment under model uncertainty: the robust forward criteria," Papers 1311.3529, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2014.
    19. Peter Lindberg, 2012. "Optimal partial hedging of an American option: shifting the focus to the expiration date," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 221-243, June.
    20. Dmitry Kramkov & Sergio Pulido, 2014. "Stability and analytic expansions of local solutions of systems of quadratic BSDEs with applications to a price impact model," Papers 1410.6144, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Maximin problem; Saddle point; Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs equation; Robust utility maximization; Generalized control; 60H10; 60H30; 90C47; G3; D5;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:535-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.