IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i7d10.1007_s10198-025-01760-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of medication adherence with treatment preferences: incentivizing truthful self-reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Carina Oedingen

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Raf Gestel

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven)

  • Samare P. I. Huls

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Georg Granic

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Esther W. Bekker-Grob

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Jorien Veldwijk

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

Objective Self-reported medication adherence may be influenced by socially desirable answers and untruthful reporting. Misreporting of adherence behavior can bias estimations of treatment (cost)effectiveness. This study investigated how to induce truthful self-reported medication adherence and evaluated how self-reported (truth-induced vs. regularly reported) medication adherence and treatment preferences were associated. Methods Medication adherence was measured after a discrete choice experiment eliciting stated preferences for Multiple Sclerosis (MS)-treatments. Data was collected among MS-patients in three Western countries. Half of the sample was randomized to ‘choice-matching’, a novel mechanism which induces truthfulness. It financially compensates respondents based on their self-reported adherence and guesses about other respondents’ adherence. To investigate the impact of truth-incentivized adherence reporting on preference heterogeneity, interaction effects between medication adherence and treatment preferences were tested separately within the choice-matching and the ‘standard’ group. Results The sample comprised 380 MS-patients (mean age 41y, 69% female). Respondents in the choice-matching group reported a lower medication adherence compared to the standard group (always adherent: 39.3% vs. 46.6%). Mixed logit models showed significant interaction effects: in the choice-matching group, higher medication adherence resulted in lower utility for pills twice/day compared to injections three times/week (p = 0.019), while in the standard group, respondents with higher medication adherence preferred pills once/day compared to injections three times/week (p = 0.005). Conclusion Choice-matching likely encouraged respondents to report their true medication adherence. Linking truthful behavior to patients’ preferences allows for a better understanding of preference heterogeneity and helping to make decisions that fit patients’ true preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Carina Oedingen & Raf Gestel & Samare P. I. Huls & Georg Granic & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Jorien Veldwijk, 2025. "Association of medication adherence with treatment preferences: incentivizing truthful self-reporting," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(7), pages 1219-1232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01760-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01760-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01760-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01760-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01760-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.