IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i4d10.1007_s10668-024-04609-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil conservation projects and their consequences: the behavior analysis of Iranian farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Yaghoubi Farani

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran
    Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University)

  • Saeid Hedayati Nia

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University)

  • Karwan Shanazi

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University)

  • Pouria Ataie

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Karim Naderi Mahdei

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University)

  • Hossein Azadi

    (Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the consequences of protective tillage projects and investigate farmers' behavior during their implementation, contributing to the field of sustainable agriculture. The study focused on farmers participating in a soil conservation project in Kermanshah County, Iran (N = 70). Employing a quantitative approach, a validated questionnaire serves as the research instrument, ensuring the reliability of data collection. The study identified the social, environmental, and economic factors as the most significant consequences of the protective tillage project according to farmers' rankings. The study uncovers that implementing the protective tillage project not only leads to desirable outcomes such as income generation, employment opportunities, and improved social welfare but also enhances community participation and communication within the region. This novel finding highlights the social benefits associated with agricultural innovations and emphasizes the importance of fostering local engagement. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the factors influencing farmers' behavioral intentions. It identifies mental norms, attitudes, and perceived behavioral control as significant determinants of farmers' willingness to adopt protective tillage practices. This insight provides valuable guidance for designing effective intervention strategies and promoting behavioral changes among farmers, ultimately fostering the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. In conclusion, this research contributes to the literature on sustainable agriculture by evaluating the consequences of protective tillage projects, uncovering the social benefits they bring, and exploring the underlying factors that drive farmers' behavioral intentions. By aligning protective tillage systems with farmers' behavioral processes, long-term sustainability in agriculture can be ensured. The study emphasizes the necessity of collaborative efforts between farmers and extension agencies in delivering soil conservation projects effectively. Ultimately, this study demonstrates the applicability of behavioral theories in driving agricultural innovations, paving the way for future research and policy development in the field of sustainable agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Yaghoubi Farani & Saeid Hedayati Nia & Karwan Shanazi & Pouria Ataie & Karim Naderi Mahdei & Hossein Azadi, 2025. "Soil conservation projects and their consequences: the behavior analysis of Iranian farmers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 9447-9476, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04609-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04609-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04609-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04609-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Yeu Wang & Shih-Mao Lin, 2020. "Intervention Strategies on the Wastewater Treatment Behavior of Swine Farmers: An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Salma Taqi Ghulam & Hatem Abushammala, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Electronic Waste and Its Impact on Human Health and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Xin Yang & Yiming Sang, 2020. "How Does Part-Time Farming Affect Farmers’ Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Jianghan Plain, China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Xiaohui Huang & Lili Wang & Qian Lu, 2018. "Vulnerability Assessment of Soil and Water Loss in Loess Plateau and Its Impact on Farmers’ Soil and Water Conservation Adaptive Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Heleene Tambet & Yaniv Stopnitzky, 2021. "Climate Adaptation and Conservation Agriculture among Peruvian Farmers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 900-922, May.
    7. Telles, Tiago Santos & Reydon, Bastiaan Philip & Maia, Alexandre Gori, 2018. "Effects of no-tillage on agricultural land values in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 124-129.
    8. Lalani, Baqir & Dorward, Peter & Holloway, Garth & Wauters, Erwin, 2016. "Smallholder farmers' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 80-90.
    9. Qin, Chuangjian & Tang, Zhenda & Chen, Jing & Chen, Xiding, 2020. "The impact of soil and water resource conservation on agricultural production- an analysis of the agricultural production performance in Zhejiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Rahayu, Dewi Ning & Purnomo, Sutrisno Hadi & Sutrisno, Joko, 2023. "The influence of farmers' business behavior in achieving success with integrated paddy and beef cattle agricultural systems in Indonesia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(01), January.
    11. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Castillo, Gracia Maria Lanza & Engler, Alejandra & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Planned behavior and social capital: Understanding farmers’ behavior toward pressurized irrigation technologies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Brown, Brendan & Nuberg, Ian & Llewellyn, Rick, 2017. "Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilisation of conservation agriculture in Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 11-22.
    14. Seyi Olalekan Olawuyi & Abbyssinia Mushunje, 2020. "Information acquisition and adoption of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in South-West Nigeria: Recursive bivariate probit estimation," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 715-725, September.
    15. Holden, Stein T. & Fisher, Monica & Katengeza, Samson P. & Thierfelder, Christian, 2018. "Can lead farmers reveal the adoption potential of conservation agriculture? The case of Malawi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 113-123.
    16. Razafimahatratra, Hanitriniaina Mamy & Bignebat, Céline & David-Benz, Hélène & Bélières, Jean-François & Penot, Eric, 2021. "Tryout and (Dis)adoption of conservation agriculture. Evidence from Western Madagascar," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Mohamed Moncef Serbaji & Moncef Bouaziz & Okba Weslati, 2023. "Soil Water Erosion Modeling in Tunisia Using RUSLE and GIS Integrated Approaches and Geospatial Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0237460 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pouria Ataei & Hassan Sadighi & Mohammad Chizari & Enayat Abbasi, 2020. "In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7215-7237, December.
    20. Vastola, Antonella & Zdruli, Pandi & D’Amico, Mario & Pappalardo, Gioacchino & Viccaro, Mauro & Di Napoli, Francesco & Cozzi, Mario & Romano, Severino, 2017. "A comparative multidimensional evaluation of conservation agriculture systems: A case study from a Mediterranean area of Southern Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 326-333.
    21. Hanitriniaina Mamy Razafimahatratra & Céline Bignebat & Hélène David-Benz & Jean-François Bélières & Eric Penot, 2021. "Tryout and (Dis)adoption of conservation agriculture. Evidence from Western Madagascar," Post-Print hal-03520358, HAL.
    22. Cosmas Parwada & Hillary Marufu, 2023. "Digitalisation of agriculture in Zimbabwe: Challenges and opportunities," International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 10(1), pages 32-41.
    23. Dewi Ning Rahayu & Sutrisno Hadi Purnomo & Joko Sutrisno, 2023. "The influence of farmers' business behavior in achieving success with integrated paddy and beef cattle agricultural systems in Indonesia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 13(1), pages 16-24.
    24. Pradhan, Aliza & Chan, Catherine & Roul, Pravat Kumar & Halbrendt, Jacqueline & Sipes, Brent, 2018. "Potential of conservation agriculture (CA) for climate change adaptation and food security under rainfed uplands of India: A transdisciplinary approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 27-35.
    25. Anghinoni, Guilherme & Anghinoni, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho & Tormena, Cássio Antonio & Braccini, Alessandro Lucca & de Carvalho Mendes, Ieda & Zancanaro, Leandro & Lal, Rattan, 2021. "Conservation agriculture strengthen sustainability of Brazilian grain production and food security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    26. Gao, Lan & Wang, Shanyong & Li, Jun & Li, Haidong, 2017. "Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 107-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Poczta-Wajda, Agnieszka & Matuszczak, Anna & Smędzik-Ambroży, Katarzyna & Guth, Marta, 2025. "Exploring intentions to convert into organic farming in small-scale agriculture: Social embeddedness in extended theory of planned behaviour framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Rodríguez-Barillas, María & Klerkx, Laurens & Poortvliet, P. Marijn, 2024. "What determines the acceptance of Climate Smart Technologies? The influence of farmers' behavioral drivers in connection with the policy environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Bright Obuobi & Hong Wang & Faustina Awuah & Emmanuel Nketiah & Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi & Mavis Adjei, 2024. "The aftermath of COVID-19 impacts: examining the impact of COVID-19 on residents' current food waste behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25503-25526, October.
    4. Mulugeta Y Birhanu & Girma T Kassie & Tadelle Dessie, 2024. "The adoption non-adoption dichotomy: Why do smallholder producers dis-adopt improved chicken breeds?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Bao, Helen X.H. & Jiang, Yan & Wang, Ziyou & Feng, Lei, 2024. "Social capital and the effectiveness of land use policies: Evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Bloem, Jeffrey R. & Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Adjognon, Serge G. & Dillon, Andrew, 2022. "Private Sector Promotion of Climate-Smart Technologies: Experimental Evidence from Nigeria," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322152, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Li, Fuduo & Zhang, Kangjie & Ren, Jing & Yin, Changbin & Zhang, Yang & Nie, Jun, 2021. "Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: The case of rice-green manure crops rotation system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Asamoah, Ama Nyarko & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2023. "Reducing waste management challenges: Empirical assessment of waste sorting intention among corporate employees in Ghana," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Jindřich Špička & Tomáš Vintr & Renata Aulová & Jana Macháčková, 2020. "Trade-off between the economic and environmental sustainability in Czech dual farm structure," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 243-250.
    12. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The discrimination of adopters and non-adopters of conservation agricultural initiatives in northwest Iran: Attitudinal, soil testing, and topographical modules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Zhang, Wenqing & Liu, Liangliang, 2022. "Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 180-195.
    14. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    15. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Cristina Macci & Francesca Vannucchi & Eleonora Peruzzi & Serena Doni & Stefano Lucchetti & Karel Waska & Monika Heřmánková & Roberto Scodellini & Alessandra Cincinelli & Francesco Paolo Nicese & Lapo, 2025. "A low impact sediment and green waste co-compost: can it replace peat in the nursery sector?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10761-10788, May.
    17. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    18. Morais, Manoela & Binotto, Erlaine & Borges, João Augusto Rossi, 2017. "Identifying beliefs underlying successors’ intention to take over the farm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-58.
    19. Theodoros Skevas & Ray Massey & Jasper Grashuis, 2022. "Farmer adoption and intensity of use of extreme weather adaptation and mitigation strategies: evidence from a sample of Missouri farmers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Daniela Salite, 2019. "Explaining the uncertainty: understanding small-scale farmers’ cultural beliefs and reasoning of drought causes in Gaza Province, Southern Mozambique," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 427-441, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04609-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.