IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i2d10.1007_s10668-020-00701-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variations in village-level performances related to reducing deforestation and forest degradation associated with a REDD+ project in northern Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Motoshi Hiratsuka

    (Waseda University)

  • Chaloun Bounithiphonh

    (National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry)

  • Phonevilay Sichanthongthip

    (National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry)

  • Tomoko Furuta

    (Japan Forest Technology Association)

  • Kei Suzuki

    (Japan Forest Technology Association)

  • Natsuko Kobayashi

    (Waseda University)

  • Haruko Chikaraishi

    (Green Power Investment Corporation)

  • Chanhsamone Phongoudome

    (National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry)

  • Masahiro Amano

    (Waseda University)

Abstract

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) schemes, considered a key means of mitigating climate change, is being comprehensively implemented in a few countries. However, the issue of social equity requires serious consideration to ensure their sustainability. We assessed performances in implementing a REDD+ project during its demonstration phase (2013–2018) in five villages in the northern mountainous region of Lao People’s Democratic Republic, inhabited by people of the predominant Khmu and Hmong ethnicities. The evaluation covered actual land-cover changes (revealed through satellite imagery) and social changes and income generation assessed through a questionnaire-based survey. Prior to the implementation of the REDD+ demonstration project, natural resources varied across the five villages, whose social characteristics were closely linked to these resources. After the project’s implementation, income generation varied significantly among the ethnic groups and across village types according to determined land allocation and each ethnic group’s characteristics relating to the adoption of new and alternative livelihoods. The results of a canonical discriminant analysis using explanatory variables indicated that 77.3% of the initially categorized respondents were correctly classified for the ethnic group variable, and 70.1% were correctly classified for the village types variable within the village cluster targeted in the project. The results showed that rural people who depend on natural resources vary in their capabilities to transition to alternative livelihoods. Traditional livelihoods and social conditions, entailing capabilities and functions for implementing alternative livelihoods were closely linked to land and forest management outcomes. Levels of performance in implementing activities aimed at reducing deforestation and forest degradation evidently differed among rural groups and villages. Moreover, our findings indicated that to avoid implementation difficulties and to keep equity, the village-level REDD+ should be informed by the specific features and capabilities of rural people within each village, thereby reducing the risk of unsustainable REDD+.

Suggested Citation

  • Motoshi Hiratsuka & Chaloun Bounithiphonh & Phonevilay Sichanthongthip & Tomoko Furuta & Kei Suzuki & Natsuko Kobayashi & Haruko Chikaraishi & Chanhsamone Phongoudome & Masahiro Amano, 2021. "Variations in village-level performances related to reducing deforestation and forest degradation associated with a REDD+ project in northern Lao People’s Democratic Republic," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2762-2784, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00701-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00701-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00701-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-00701-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Luttrell & Erin Sills & Riza Aryani & Andini Desita Ekaputri & Maria Febe Evinke, 2018. "Beyond opportunity costs: who bears the implementation costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 291-310, February.
    2. Hickey, Gordon M. & Pouliot, Mariève & Smith-Hall, Carsten & Wunder, Sven & Nielsen, Martin R., 2016. "Quantifying the economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 122-132.
    3. West, Thales A.P. & Grogan, Kelly A. & Swisher, Marilyn E. & Caviglia-Harris, Jill L. & Sills, Erin O. & Roberts, Dar A. & Harris, Daniel & Putz, Francis E., 2018. "Impacts of REDD+ payments on a coupled human-natural system in Amazonia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PA), pages 68-76.
    4. Jewel Andoh & Yohan Lee, 2018. "National REDD+ Strategy for Climate Change Mitigation: A Review and Comparison of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manda, Simon & Mukanda, Nyambe, 2023. "Can REDD+ projects deliver livelihood benefits in private tenure arrangements? Experiences from rural Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Jichuan & Tang, Weizong & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2019. "Incentivizing REDD+: The role of cost-sharing mechanisms in encouraging stakeholders to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Sumitra Paudel & Carsten Smith-Hall, 2022. "Empirically derived typologies of environmental product periodic markets and retailers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13111-13136, November.
    3. Jayasinghe, Maneka & Chai, Andreas & Ratnasiri, Shyama & Smith, Christine, 2017. "The power of the vegetable patch: How home-grown food helps large rural households achieve economies of scale & escape poverty," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 62-74.
    4. Montira J. Pongsiri & Andrea M. Bassi, 2021. "A Systems Understanding Underpins Actions at the Climate and Health Nexus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Energy Consumption Versus Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 185-198.
    6. Tomas Gabriel Bas & Jacques Gagnon & Philippe Gagnon & Angela Contreras, 2022. "Analysis of Agro Alternatives to Boost Cameroon’s Socio-Environmental Resilience, Sustainable Development, and Conservation of Native Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Montoya-Zumaeta, Javier G. & Wunder, Sven & Tacconi, Luca, 2021. "Incentive-based conservation in Peru: Assessing the state of six ongoing PES and REDD+ initiatives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Homervergel G. Ong & Young-Dong Kim, 2017. "The role of wild edible plants in household food security among transitioning hunter-gatherers: evidence from the Philippines," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(1), pages 11-24, February.
    9. C. Hall & J. I. Macdiarmid & R. B. Matthews & P. Smith & S. F. Hubbard & T. P. Dawson, 2019. "The relationship between forest cover and diet quality: a case study of rural southern Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(3), pages 635-650, June.
    10. Raehyun Kim & Dong-hwan Kim & Seongsil Cho & Eunho Choi & Jinwoo Park & Sue Kyoung Lee & Yowhan Son, 2021. "Assessment of REDD+ MRV Capacity in Developing Countries and Implications under the Paris Regime," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Bethânia Ávila Rodrigues & Mariana Machado Fidelis Nascimento & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2021. "Mapping of the behavior of scientific publications since the decade of 1990 until the present day in the field of food and nutrition security," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2459-2483, March.
    12. Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt & Theilade, Ida & Meilby, Henrik & Nui, Nguyen Hai & Lam, Nguyen Thanh, 2018. "Can PES and REDD+ match Willingness To Accept payments in contracts for reforestation and avoided forest degradation? The case of farmers in upland Bac Kan, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 822-833.
    13. Nantongo, Mary & Vatn, Arild, 2019. "Estimating Transaction Costs of REDD+," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-11.
    14. West, Thales A.P. & Monge, Juan J. & Dowling, Les J. & Wakelin, Steve J. & Gibbs, Holly K., 2020. "Promotion of afforestation in New Zealand’s marginal agricultural lands through payments for environmental services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    15. Kemigisha, Esther & Angelsen, Arild & Babweteera, Fred & Mugisha, Johnny, 2022. "Survival- versus opportunity-driven environmental reliance: Evidence from Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Köhl, Michael & Neupane, Prem Raj & Mundhenk, Philip, 2020. "REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification – A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+MRV costs by result-based payments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Babatunde Owolodun & Sonja Merten, 2023. "Food Security from the Forest: The Case of the Commodification of Baobab Fruit ( Adansonia digitata L.) in Boundou Region, Senegal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Hussein Luswaga & Ernst-August Nuppenau, 2022. "Non-timber forest products income and inequality status for communities around West Usambara Mountain Forests in Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11651-11675, October.
    19. Roger R. B. Leakey & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, 2021. "African Lives Matter: Wild Food Plants Matter for Livelihoods, Justice, and the Environment—A Policy Brief for Agricultural Reform and New Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Handavu, Ferdinand & Chirwa, Paxie W.C. & Syampungani, Stephen, 2019. "Socio-economic factors influencing land-use and land-cover changes in the miombo woodlands of the Copperbelt province in Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 75-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00701-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.