IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i4d10.1007_s00180-024-01555-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should sports professionals consider their adversary’s strategy? A case study of match play in golf

Author

Listed:
  • Nishad Wajge

    (University of Maryland)

  • Gautier Stauffer

    (University of Lausanne, Quartier Unil-Chamberonne)

Abstract

This study explores strategic considerations in professional golf’s Match Play format. Leveraging Professional Golfers’ Association Tour data, we investigate the impact of factoring in an adversary’s strategy. Our findings suggest that while slight strategy adjustments can be advantageous in specific scenarios, the overall benefit of considering an opponent’s strategy remains modest. This confirms the common wisdom in golf, reinforcing the recommendation to adhere to optimal stroke-play strategies due to challenges in obtaining precise opponent statistics. The methodology employed here is generic and could offer valuable insights into whether opponents’ performances should also be considered in other two-player or team sports, such as tennis, darts, soccer, volleyball, etc. We hope that this research will pave the way for new avenues of study in these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Nishad Wajge & Gautier Stauffer, 2025. "Should sports professionals consider their adversary’s strategy? A case study of match play in golf," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 2005-2029, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01555-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-024-01555-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-024-01555-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-024-01555-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01555-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.