IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v17y2020i1d10.1007_s10287-018-0301-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the generalized maximum covering location model to control a project’s progress

Author

Listed:
  • Narjes Sabeghi

    (Velayat University
    Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Hamed Reza Tareghian

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

Abstract

Project control consists of monitoring a project’s progress at so called control points, finding possible deviations from the baseline schedule and if necessary, making adjustments to the deviated schedule subject to the available control budget, the adjusting strategies and also other technical and environmental possibilities in order to bring the schedule back on the right track. In this study, we adapt for the first time the generalized maximum covering location model to determine the adjusting strategies such that the maximum control coverage is achieved, i.e. under the given constraints, a schedule that is globally as close to the baseline schedule as possible is obtained. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the intricacies of the proposed method and also to demonstrate its applicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Narjes Sabeghi & Hamed Reza Tareghian, 2020. "Using the generalized maximum covering location model to control a project’s progress," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:17:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10287-018-0301-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-018-0301-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10287-018-0301-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-018-0301-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G Zhu & J F Bard & G Yu, 2005. "Disruption management for resource-constrained project scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(4), pages 365-381, April.
    2. Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry & Drezner, Zvi, 2003. "The gradual covering decay location problem on a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 474-480, December.
    3. Aytug, Haldun & Lawley, Mark A. & McKay, Kenneth & Mohan, Shantha & Uzsoy, Reha, 2005. "Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 86-110, February.
    4. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    5. Zvi Drezner & George O. Wesolowsky & Tammy Drezner, 2004. "The gradual covering problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(6), pages 841-855, September.
    6. Raz, Tzvi & Erel, Erdal, 2000. "Optimal timing of project control points," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 252-261, December.
    7. Golenko-Ginzburg, Dimitri & Laslo, Zohar, 2001. "Timing control points via simulation for production systems under random disturbances," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 451-458.
    8. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during projecttracking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 416-426, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    2. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    4. Wauters, Mathieu & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2017. "A Nearest Neighbour extension to project duration forecasting with Artificial Intelligence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1097-1111.
    5. Taymaz, S. & Iyigun, C. & Bayindir, Z.P. & Dellaert, N.P., 2020. "A healthcare facility location problem for a multi-disease, multi-service environment under risk aversion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Karatas, Mumtaz & Eriskin, Levent, 2023. "Linear and piecewise linear formulations for a hierarchical facility location and sizing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Shahzad Bhatti & Michael Lim & Ho-Yin Mak, 2015. "Alternative fuel station location model with demand learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 230(1), pages 105-127, July.
    8. Wang, Wei & Wu, Shining & Wang, Shuaian & Zhen, Lu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Emergency facility location problems in logistics: Status and perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Tony H. Grubesic & Timothy C. Matisziw & Alan T. Murray, 2011. "Market Coverage and Service Quality in Digital Subscriber Lines Infrastructure Planning," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 34(3), pages 368-390, July.
    10. Mehdi Ansari & Juan S. Borrero & Leonardo Lozano, 2023. "Robust Minimum-Cost Flow Problems Under Multiple Ripple Effect Disruptions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 83-103, January.
    11. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Pawel Kalczynski, 2020. "Directional approach to gradual cover: a maximin objective," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 121-139, January.
    12. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "The impact of applying effort to reduce activity variability on the project time and cost performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 442-453.
    13. Ö Hazır & A Shtub, 2011. "Effects of the information presentation format on project control," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(12), pages 2157-2161, December.
    14. Kaut, Michal & Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2021. "The combined impact of stochastic and correlated activity durations and design uncertainty on project plans," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Bashiri, Mahdi & Chehrepak, Elaheh & Gomari, Saeed, 2014. "Gradual Covering Location Problem with Stochastic Radius," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Current Issues and Emerging Practices. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferenc, volume 19, pages 165-186, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2017. "A buffer control method for top-down project control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 274-286.
    17. Karatas, Mumtaz & Eriskin, Levent, 2021. "The minimal covering location and sizing problem in the presence of gradual cooperative coverage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 838-856.
    18. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Pawel Kalczynski, 2021. "Directional approach to gradual cover: the continuous case," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 25-47, January.
    19. Eda Yücel & F. Sibel Salman & Burçin Bozkaya & Cemre Gökalp, 2020. "A data-driven optimization framework for routing mobile medical facilities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 1077-1102, August.
    20. Agathe Gilain & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Managing Learning Curves In The Unknown: From ‘Learning By Doing’ To ‘Learning By Designing’," Post-Print hal-01900961, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:17:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10287-018-0301-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.