IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v66y2024i2d10.1007_s12599-023-00829-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Taxonomy Development Method to Define the Vocabulary for Rule-Based Guidance in Complex Emerging Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Odette Sangupamba Mwilu

    (Université Catholique du Congo
    Université Pédagogique Nationale)

  • Nicolas Prat

    (ESSEC Business School)

  • Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau

    (ESSEC Business School)

Abstract

Emerging technologies are characterized by their uncertainty and potential impact. Decisions about these technologies are therefore crucial and difficult. The problem is particularly acute for complex emerging technologies, which combine several technologies. Guidance on emerging technologies is often lacking, even more for complex ones. In this research, methods and models to guide practitioners (members of the IT personnel) in the adoption of complex emerging technologies are defined. Guidance is provided by means of productions rules, requiring a controlled vocabulary organized as a taxonomy. The rules, and the vocabulary for the rules, are defined by researchers for a specific complex emerging technology (e.g., business intelligence and analytics in the cloud). They may then be applied by practitioners to decide on the adoption of the emerging technology in a specific organizational context. The approach is based on systematic literature review, thereby contributing to evidence-based practice. This paper focuses on the method to define the controlled vocabulary for the production rules. This taxonomy development method is built by combining systematic literature review with a method for taxonomy development, considering the specificities of rule-based guidance and complex emerging technologies. It is demonstrated on business intelligence and analytics in the cloud and evaluated in a government agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Odette Sangupamba Mwilu & Nicolas Prat & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau, 2024. "A Taxonomy Development Method to Define the Vocabulary for Rule-Based Guidance in Complex Emerging Technologies," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(2), pages 161-180, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00829-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-023-00829-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-023-00829-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-023-00829-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Weber & Moritz Beutter & Jörg Weking & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "AI Startup Business Models," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(1), pages 91-109, February.
    2. Rotolo, Daniele & Hicks, Diana & Martin, Ben R., 2015. "What is an emerging technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1827-1843.
    3. Buhalis, Dimitrios & Volchek, Katerina, 2021. "Bridging marketing theory and big data analytics: The taxonomy of marketing attribution," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Hendrik van der Valk & Hendrik Haße & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Archetypes of Digital Twins," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 375-391, June.
    5. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    6. Vidgen, Richard & Shaw, Sarah & Grant, David B., 2017. "Management challenges in creating value from business analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 626-639.
    7. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research," Post-Print hal-02546799, HAL.
    8. Antje Janssen & Jens Passlick & Davinia Rodríguez Cardona & Michael H. Breitner, 2020. "Virtual Assistance in Any Context," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 211-225, June.
    9. He, Wu & Zhang, Zuopeng (Justin) & Li, Wenzhuo, 2021. "Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    2. Maike Althaus & Christian Vorbohle & Michelle Müller & Dennis Kundisch, 2025. "Setting the stage for a flourishing cultural data ecosystem: A spotlight on business models of cultural event platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Lukas Fabri & Björn Häckel & Anna Maria Oberländer & Marius Rieg & Alexander Stohr, 2023. "Disentangling Human-AI Hybrids," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(6), pages 623-641, December.
    4. Tabesh, Pooya & Mousavidin, Elham & Hasani, Sona, 2019. "Implementing big data strategies: A managerial perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 347-358.
    5. Rehman, Anisur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md Saiful & Elahi, Yasir Arafat & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing marketing capabilities of retail SMEs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Zhang, Yi & Huang, Ying & Porter, Alan L. & Zhang, Guangquan & Lu, Jie, 2019. "Discovering and forecasting interactions in big data research: A learning-enhanced bibliometric study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 795-807.
    7. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    8. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    9. Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan Porter & Nils Newman, 2024. "How does regulatory uncertainty shape the innovation process? Evidence from the case of nanomedicine," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 262-302, February.
    10. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    11. Maggie Wang, Yazhu & Matook, Sabine & Dennis, Alan R., 2024. "Unintended consequences of humanoid service robots: A case study of public service organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Sascha Julian Oks & Max Jalowski & Michael Lechner & Stefan Mirschberger & Marion Merklein & Birgit Vogel-Heuser & Kathrin M. Möslein, 2024. "Cyber-Physical Systems in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review, Categorization and Outlook," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1731-1772, October.
    13. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    15. Andrzej Magruk, 2021. "Analysis of Uncertainties and Levels of Foreknowledge in Relation to Major Features of Emerging Technologies—The Context of Foresight Research for the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Stefano Bianchini & Moritz Müller & Pierre Pelletier, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention," Post-Print hal-03958025, HAL.
    17. Cécile Godé & François de Corbière & Jessie Pallud, 2020. "Les technologies émergentes en contexte extrême : de l’adaptation à l’anticipation ? (Editorial)," Post-Print hal-02912845, HAL.
    18. Papanagnou, Christos & Seiler, Andreas & Spanaki, Konstantina & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Bourlakis, Michael, 2022. "Data-driven digital transformation for emergency situations: The case of the UK retail sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    19. Katarina Kostelić, 2021. "Game Awareness: A Questionnaire," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-39, December.
    20. Melina Panzner & Sebastian Enzberg & Maurice Meyer & Roman Dumitrescu, 2024. "Characterization of Usage Data with the Help of Data Classifications," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 88-109, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00829-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.