IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v3y2011i4p199-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Potentials and Challenges of Service-Oriented Architectures

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Becker
  • Thomas Widjaja
  • Peter Buxmann

Abstract

This article summarizes the results of an empirical study among large German enterprises regarding the value potentials and challenges of service-oriented architectures (SOA). The 21 value potentials and 13 challenges examined were identified and structured based on an advancement of SOA value models already existing in literature as well as on a series of expert interviews. Key results regarding the implementation and evaluation of the SOA-Concept are: The majority of the users only run one or a few SOA-based applications and the share of services in their IT-landscape is on average about 10%. Among the design principles proposed in literature, especially loose coupling and good documentation of interfaces are implemented. Clear capsulation of functionality and the definition of Service Level Agreements (SLAs), however, are hardly applied. The interviewed companies assess the relation of the value of a SOA introduction compared to its cost currently as slightly negative, but with a positive trend for the upcoming years. It is shown that the assessment of the overall value positively correlates with the duration of SOA usage. Among the 21 examined value potentials, optimization of business processes, increased agility and cost reduction due to parallel re-use of services receive the highest ratings. According to the interviewed experts, the main challenges are operation (performance/security) and the management (governance) of the architecture. These challenges hinder value realization and lead to a moderately positive assessment of the overall concept. Copyright Gabler Verlag 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Becker & Thomas Widjaja & Peter Buxmann, 2011. "Value Potentials and Challenges of Service-Oriented Architectures," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 199-210, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:199-210
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-011-0167-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12599-011-0167-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-011-0167-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papazoglou, M. & van den Heuvel, W.J.A.M., 2007. "Service oriented architectures : Approaches, technologies and research issues," Other publications TiSEM c0ca7265-f37f-42ed-a261-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Harzing, Anne-Wil & Baldueza, Joyce & Barner-Rasmussen, Wilhelm & Barzantny, Cordula & Canabal, Anne & Davila, Anabella & Espejo, Alvaro & Ferreira, Rita & Giroud, Axele & Koester, Kathrin & Liang, Yu, 2009. "Rating versus ranking: What is the best way to reduce response and language bias in cross-national research?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 417-432, August.
    3. Becker, Alexander & Buxmann, Peter & Widjaja, Thomas, 2009. "Value Potential and Challenges of Service-Oriented Architectures - A User and Vendor Perspective," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 103152, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gong, Yiwei & Janssen, Marijn, 2019. "The value of and myths about enterprise architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Ivo Blohm & Felix Wortmann & Christine Legner & Felix Köbler, 2024. "Data products, data mesh, and data fabric," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 643-652, October.
    3. Hans Ulrich Buhl & Björn Steven Häckel & Florian Probst & Josef Schosser, 2016. "On the Ex Ante Valuation of IT Service Investments," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(6), pages 415-432, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Ramasamy, Bala & Chen, Junsong & Paliwoda, Stan, 2013. "Customer satisfaction and consumer expenditure in selected European countries," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 406-416.
    2. Tröger, Ralph & Alt, Rainer, 2011. "Serviceorientiertes Supply Chain Event Management (SCEM) – Nutzen und Architektur für globale Lieferketten am Beispiel der Modeindustrie," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(2), pages 115-129.
    3. Emad ABU-SHANAB & Khalil Md NOR, 2013. "The Influence Of Language On Research Results," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(4), pages 37-48, December.
    4. Harzing, Anne-Wil & Pudelko, Markus, 2013. "Language competencies, policies and practices in multinational corporations: A comprehensive review and comparison of Anglophone, Asian, Continental European and Nordic MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 87-97.
    5. AnneMarie Eijkelenboom & Marco A. Ortiz & Philomena M. Bluyssen, 2021. "Preferences for Indoor Environmental and Social Comfort of Outpatient Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic, an Explanatory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Tomohiro Tasaki & Ryo Tajima & Yasuko Kameyama, 2021. "Measurement of the Importance of 11 Sustainable Development Criteria: How Do the Important Criteria Differ among Four Asian Countries and Shift as the Economy Develops?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Len J. Treviño & Carolyn P. Egri & David A. Ralston & Irina Naoumova & Olivier Furrer & Yongjuan Li & Fidel León Darder & María Teresa Garza Carranza, 2021. "A multi-country, multi-sector replication challenge to the validity of the cultural tightness-looseness measure," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 735-764, June.
    8. Fan, Shea X. & Harzing, Anne-Wil, 2017. "Host country employees’ ethnic identity confirmation: Evidence from interactions with ethnically similar expatriates," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 640-652.
    9. Victor Chang & Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Muthu Ramachandran, 2019. "Towards a Reuse Strategic Decision Pattern Framework – from Theories to Practices," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 27-44, February.
    10. F. Franceschini & D. Maisano, 2020. "Adapting Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment to fuse preference orderings in manufacturing applications," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 387-402, February.
    11. Sven Dahms & Suthikorn Kingkaew & Eddy Ng, 2022. "The Effects of Top Management Team National Diversity and Institutional Uncertainty on Subsidiary CSR Focus," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 699-715, May.
    12. Arne Katzmarzik, 2011. "Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(1), pages 19-31, February.
    13. Sven Dahms & Suthikorn Kingkaew, 2016. "University Business Incubators: An Institutional Demand Side Perspective on Value Adding Features," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 4(3), pages 41-56.
    14. Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Cristescu, Anamaria, 2013. "Do culture-dependent response styles distort substantial relationships?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 814-827.
    15. Marco Crasso & Alejandro Zunino & Marcelo Campo, 2011. "Combining query-by-example and query expansion for simplifying web service discovery," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 407-428, July.
    16. Kassas, Bachir & Palma, Marco & Zhang, Yvette, 2015. "Preference Inconsistencies of a Rational Decision Maker," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229737, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Alexander Gromoff & Yulia Bilinkis & Nikolay Kazantsev, 2017. "Business Architecture Flexibility as a Result of Knowledge-Intensive Process Management," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(1), pages 73-86, March.
    18. Willy Kengne Kungne & Georges-Edouard Kouamou & Claude Tangha, 2020. "A Rule-Based Language and Verification Framework of Dynamic Service Composition," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Christoph Dorsch, 2015. "On the Sound Financial Valuation of Flexibility in Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(2), pages 115-127, April.
    20. Nane Kratzke & Robert Siegfried, 2021. "Towards cloud-native simulations – lessons learned from the front-line of cloud computing," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 18(1), pages 39-58, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:199-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.