IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v16y2018i4d10.1007_s40258-018-0385-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Measurement in Health Facilities: A Systematic Review in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Firdaus Hafidz

    () (University of Leeds
    Universitas Gadjah Mada)

  • Tim Ensor

    () (University of Leeds)

  • Sandy Tubeuf

    () (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Abstract Background Limited healthcare resources in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have led policy-makers to improve healthcare efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to understand how efficiency has been measured in the LMIC setting. Objective This paper reviews methodologies used for efficiency studies in health facilities in LMICs. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, EconLit and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses databases to Week 6 in 2018. We included all types of quantitative analysis studies relating to the measurement of the efficiency of services at health facilities in LMICs. We extracted data from eligible studies, and assessed the validity for each study. Because of the substantial heterogeneity of the studies, results were presented narratively. Results A total of 137 papers were eligible for inclusion. These articles covered a wide range of health facility types, with more than half of the studies relating to hospitals. Our systematic review showed that there is an increasing trend in efficiency measurements in LMICs using various methods. Most studies employed data envelopment analysis as an efficiency measurement method. The studies typically included physical inputs and health services as outputs. Sixty-one percent of the studies analysed the contextual variables of the health facility efficiency. Conclusion This review highlights the potential for methodological improvement and policy impacts in efficiency measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Firdaus Hafidz & Tim Ensor & Sandy Tubeuf, 2018. "Efficiency Measurement in Health Facilities: A Systematic Review in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 465-480, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-018-0385-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0385-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-018-0385-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audibert, Martine & Mathonnat, Jacky & Pelissier, Aurore & Huang, Xiao Xian & Ma, Anning, 2013. "Health insurance reform and efficiency of township hospitals in rural China: An analysis from survey data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 326-338.
    2. Matranga, Domenica & Sapienza, Francesca, 2015. "Congestion analysis to evaluate the efficiency and appropriateness of hospitals in Sicily," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 324-332.
    3. Lee, Kwang-soo & Chun, Ki-hong & Lee, Jung-soo, 2008. "Reforming the hospital service structure to improve efficiency: Urban hospital specialization," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 41-49, July.
    4. Mareike Heimeshoff & Jonas Schreyögg & Lukas Kwietniewski, 2014. "Cost and technical efficiency of physician practices: a stochastic frontier approach using panel data," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 150-161, June.
    5. Jacobs,Rowena & Smith,Peter C. & Street,Andrew, 2006. "Measuring Efficiency in Health Care," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521851442, December.
    6. Pablo Arocena & Ariadna García-Prado, 2007. "Accounting for quality in the measurement of hospital performance: evidence from Costa Rica," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(7), pages 667-685.
    7. Emrouznejad, Ali & Parker, Barnett R. & Tavares, Gabriel, 2008. "Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 151-157, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Thesis Thursday: Firdaus Hafidz
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2019-01-17 07:00:26

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-018-0385-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.