IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v349y2025i2d10.1007_s10479-021-03992-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the risk exposure of sustainable freight transportation: a two-phase solution approach

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Choudhary

    (Indian Institute of Management Sambalpur)

  • Alok Choudhary

    (Loughborough University)

  • Ravi Shankar

    (Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi)

  • Christian Hicks

    (Newcastle University Business School)

Abstract

A combination of sustainability-related regulations and increased demand from stakeholders has pressed firms to adequately address sustainability-related risks. This issue is particularly important, and challenging, for the freight transportation sector due to its exposure to a large number of inherent sustainability risks. Despite the growing significance of sustainability risks, there is a lack of research related to sustainability risk management, which may be due to the difficulties in identifying and evaluating sustainability risks. We aim to fill this research gap by identifying, measuring and modelling sustainability risks in the context of freight transportation. Our research makes three primary contributions. First, we introduce the concept of a sustainability risk index (SRI) to understand the risk exposure of freight transportation systems (FTSs) in the context of India, an emerging market. The SRI is a mathematical tool used to measure sustainability risks and to quantify a firm’s exposure to sustainability-related risks. Second, we propose an integrated two-phase model based on an interval 2-tuple linguistic model and a digraph matrix approach to calculate the SRI. In contrast to other existing techniques, the proposed approach can effectively deal with uncertain and incomplete linguistic assessments without suffering a loss of information. Third, we propose a framework for calculating both the disruption scores and influencing power of sustainability risks to evaluate the associated criticality and triggering power. For a robustness check, we also conduct a sensitivity analysis of the impact of risk variations on the SRI. Unlike conventional perceptions, our results show that organisational and governmental risks, which are mostly behavioural and skills-induced, are more significant for sustainable FTSs compared to financial risks. Our research helps the managerial community in the freight transportation sector in emerging markets to engage in more informed decision-making to proactively mitigate sustainability risks, which have potentially devastating financial, environmental and societal impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Choudhary & Alok Choudhary & Ravi Shankar & Christian Hicks, 2025. "Evaluating the risk exposure of sustainable freight transportation: a two-phase solution approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(2), pages 981-1015, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:349:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-03992-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-03992-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-03992-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-03992-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Stephan M. & Neshat, Nikrouz, 2010. "Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 121-129, July.
    2. Gan, Lin, 2003. "Globalization of the automobile industry in China: dynamics and barriers in greening of the road transportation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 537-551, May.
    3. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Nicolas Danloup & Vahid Mirzabeiki & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves & Denyse Julien & Carlos Mena, 2015. "Reducing transportation greenhouse gas emissions with collaborative distribution," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(10), pages 1049-1067, October.
    5. Sara Hajmohammad & Stephan Vachon, 2016. "Mitigation, Avoidance, or Acceptance? Managing Supplier Sustainability Risk," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 48-65, April.
    6. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 2018. "Socially and Environmentally Responsible Value Chain Innovations: New Operations Management Research Opportunities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 983-996, March.
    7. Jianqiang Cui & Jago Dodson & Peter V. Hall, 2015. "Planning for Urban Freight Transport: An Overview," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 583-598, September.
    8. Divya Choudhary & Ravi Shankar & Alok Choudhary, 2020. "An Integrated Approach for Modeling Sustainability Risks in Freight Transportation Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 858-883, April.
    9. Krishna Kumar Dadsena & S. P. Sarmah & V. N. A. Naikan, 2019. "Risk evaluation and mitigation of sustainable road freight transport operation: a case of trucking industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(19), pages 6223-6245, October.
    10. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2016. "Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-53.
    11. Christian Busse, 2016. "Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 28-47, April.
    12. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    13. Zhibin Wu & Jiuping Xu & Zeshui Xu, 2016. "A multiple attribute group decision making framework for the evaluation of lean practices at logistics distribution centers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 735-757, December.
    14. R. Rajesh & V. Ravi & R. Venkata Rao, 2015. "Selection of risk mitigation strategy in electronic supply chains using grey theory and digraph-matrix approaches," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 238-257, January.
    15. Marcus Brandenburg & Tobias Rebs, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 213-252, June.
    16. Hu-Chen Liu & Jian-Xin You & Shouming Chen & Yi-Zeng Chen, 2016. "An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1027-1042, November.
    17. Chunguang Bai & Behnam Fahimnia & Joseph Sarkis, 2017. "Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 309-340, March.
    18. Nicolas Danloup & Vahid Mirzabeiki & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves & Denyse Julien & Carlos Mena, 2015. "Reducing transportation greenhouse gas emissions with collaborative distribution," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(10), pages 1049-1067, October.
    19. Hu-Chen Liu & Yi-Zeng Chen & Jian-Xin You & Hui Li, 2016. "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 805-816, August.
    20. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    21. Prof Hamid Allaoui ,Dr. Alok Choudhary & Nicolas Danloup & Vahid Mirzabeiki & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves & Denyse Julien & Carlos Mena, 2015. "Reducing transportation greenhouse gas emissions with collaborative distribution," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(10), pages 1049-1067, October.
    22. Reefke, Hendrik & Sundaram, David, 2017. "Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 195-211.
    23. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Divya Choudhary & Ravi Shankar & Alok Choudhary, 2020. "An Integrated Approach for Modeling Sustainability Risks in Freight Transportation Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 858-883, April.
    2. André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    4. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    5. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    6. Shellye Suttles & Tara Wade & Lurleen Walters, 2025. "The potential for increased emissions due to the Electronic Logging Device mandate," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 354-371, March.
    7. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Milovan Kovač, 2023. "Assessment of city logistics initiative categories sustainability: case of Belgrade," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1383-1419, February.
    8. Deniz Köksal & Jochen Strähle, 2021. "Social Sustainability in Fashion Supply Chains—Understanding Social Standard Implementation Failures in Vietnam and Indonesia Using Agency Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-36, February.
    9. Ivana Mateska & Stephan M. Wagner & Laura Stienen, 2025. "Media Reporting of Environmental Supply Chain Sustainability Risks: Contextual and Moderating Factors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(2), pages 285-308, June.
    10. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    11. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Jamal El Baz & Anass Cherrafi & Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Kamar Zekhnini & Jean Noel Beka Be Nguema & Ridha Derrouiche, 2023. "Environmental Supply Chain Risk Management for Industry 4.0: A Data Mining Framework and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04335003, HAL.
    13. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    14. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    15. Hesam Shidpour & Mohsen Shidpour, 2025. "A quantitative study on the impact of corporate social responsibility on supplier selection and suppliers’ market share in the oil industry," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-43, March.
    16. Raut, Rakesh D. & Gardas, Bhaskar B. & Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2019. "Improvement in the food losses in fruits and vegetable supply chain - a perspective of cold third-party logistics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    17. Alexander Pavlov & Dmitry Ivanov & Dmitry Pavlov & Alexey Slinko, 2025. "Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(2), pages 495-524, June.
    18. Zhi-Jiao Du & Zhi-Xiang Chen & Su-Min Yu, 2021. "Improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Implementing Risk Assessment and Conflict Risk Mitigation with Probabilistic Linguistic Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Ahmed Mohammed & Irina Harris & Anthony Soroka & Mohamed Naim & Tim Ramjaun & Morteza Yazdani, 2021. "Gresilient supplier assessment and order allocation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 335-362, January.
    20. Vu Minh Ngo & Huy Truong Quang & Thinh Gia Hoang & An Duong Thi Binh, 2024. "Sustainability‐related supply chain risks and supply chain performances: The moderating effects of dynamic supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 839-857, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:349:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-03992-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.