IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v25y2025i1d10.1007_s12351-024-00879-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative study on the impact of corporate social responsibility on supplier selection and suppliers’ market share in the oil industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hesam Shidpour

    (Minab Higher Education Center, University of Hormozgan
    University of Hormozgan)

  • Mohsen Shidpour

    (Amir Kabir University of Technology
    University of Hormozgan)

Abstract

Due to the short-term management periods and frequent changes in leadership, especially in the oil industry in some developing countries, suppliers often prioritize profitability, neglecting the crucial impacts on the environment and society. As organization profitability has a direct relationship to its market share, this study proposes a quantitative analysis for examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility changes and market share of suppliers. To do this, this research investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility on supplier selection, order allocation, and supplier market share in the oil industry. Accordingly, this study proposes a multi-objective optimization model to address the challenges of integrating corporate social responsibility in supplier selection and order allocation problem and uses both traditional and corporate social responsibility criteria. The Best-Worth Method is applied to determine the weights of criteria. The study is validated with a numerical example and a real case to compare the amounts allocated to suppliers and their market share in two models: one that includes corporate social responsibility and one that does not. The findings indicate that there is no significant positive relationship between corporate social responsibility consideration and the improvement of suppliers' market share, at least in the short-term.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesam Shidpour & Mohsen Shidpour, 2025. "A quantitative study on the impact of corporate social responsibility on supplier selection and suppliers’ market share in the oil industry," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-43, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00879-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-024-00879-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-024-00879-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-024-00879-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cruz, Jose M. & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2008. "Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 61-74, November.
    2. Adriana Galant & Simon Cadez, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 676-693, January.
    3. Mani, Venkatesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Delgado, Catarina, 2018. "Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 259-272.
    4. Nikunja Mohan Modak & Peter Kelle, 2021. "Using social work donation as a tool of corporate social responsibility in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon emissions tax and demand uncertainty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 61-77, January.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2018. "Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 353-379.
    6. Gimenez, Cristina & Sierra, Vicenta & Rodon, Juan, 2012. "Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 149-159.
    7. Yuangao Chen & Shuo Wang & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li & Shuiqing Yang, 2018. "Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1708-1719, December.
    8. HERCIU Mihaela, 2016. "Iso 26000 – An Integrative Approach Of Corporate Social Responsibility," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 73-79, April.
    9. Ji, Ping & Ma, Xin & Li, Gang, 2015. "Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 155-162.
    10. Ciliberti, Francesco & Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo & Scozzi, Barbara, 2008. "Logistics social responsibility: Standard adoption and practices in Italian companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 88-106, May.
    11. Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Seuring, 2017. "Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review Exploring Social Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 621-643, March.
    12. Marcus Brandenburg & Tobias Rebs, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 213-252, June.
    13. Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Elva Alicia Ramos-Escobar, 2018. "CSR and the Supply Chain: Effects on the Results of SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    15. Reefke, Hendrik & Sundaram, David, 2017. "Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 195-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    2. Dong Li & Jose M. Cruz & Ke Ke, 2025. "Closed-loop supply chain network model with recycling, re-manufacturing, refurbishing, and corporate social responsibility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(1), pages 247-275, February.
    3. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    4. Rebeca B. Sánchez-Flores & Samantha E. Cruz-Sotelo & Sara Ojeda-Benitez & Ma. Elizabeth Ramírez-Barreto, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Weihua Liu & Enze Bai & Liwei Liu & Wanying Wei, 2017. "A Framework of Sustainable Service Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Mani, Venkatesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Delgado, Catarina, 2018. "Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 149-164.
    7. Atour Taghipour & Moein Khazaei & Adel Azar & Ali Rajabzadeh Ghatari & Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli & Mohammad Ramezani, 2022. "Creating Shared Value and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility through Outsourcing within Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Mani, Venkatesh & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Mani, Kavitha T.N., 2020. "Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Zhang, XiaoLi & Liu, ChenGuang & Li, WenJuan & Evans, Steve & Yin, Yong, 2017. "Effects of key enabling technologies for seru production on sustainable performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 290-307.
    11. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    14. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.
    15. Venkatesh, V.G. & Zhang, Abraham & Deakins, Eric & Mani, Venkatesh, 2021. "Antecedents of social sustainability noncompliance in the Indian apparel sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Hannu Rantanen, 2018. "Transition towards Sustainable Solutions: Product, Service, Technology, and Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Johari, Maryam & Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2019. "An evolutionary game theoretic model for analyzing pricing strategy and socially concerned behavior of manufacturers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 506-525.
    18. Govindan, Kannan & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2021. "Drivers and value-relevance of CSR performance in the logistics sector: A cross-country firm-level investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    19. Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Govindan, Kannan & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Jokar, Abbas, 2019. "An adjustable bi-level wholesale price contract for coordinating a supply chain under scenario-based stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 175-195.
    20. Min Zhou & Xianyi Long & Kannan Govindan, 2024. "Unveiling the value of institutional pressure in socially sustainable supply chain management: The role of top management support for social initiatives and organisational culture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2629-2648, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00879-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.