IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v329y2023i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04219-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual framework for information-leakage-resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Wai-Peng Wong

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

  • Kim Hua Tan

    (Nottingham University Business School)

  • Kannan Govindan

    (Shanghai Maritime University
    Yonsei University
    University of Southern Denmark)

  • Di Li

    (University of Warwick)

  • Ajay Kumar

    (AIM Research Center On Artificial Intelligence in Value Creation, EMLYON Business School)

Abstract

In today’s dynamic and competitive business environment, it is critical for firms to share information selectively and develop organizational resilience. However, only a few existing studies examine the relationships between information management and supply chain resilience. Aiming to bridge the gaps between both domains, we propose a model encompassing information security culture, information leakage, information sharing effectiveness and supply chain resilience and to derive insights from their inter-relationships in this research. A cross-sectional survey of the multi-national corporations and small and medium enterprises among their senior managers in the United Kingdom was carried out for data collection. The data set was analysed using a structural equation modelling approach. The results obtained validate the proposed model. The findings ascertain that information security culture and information leakage are negatively correlated, which influence the supply chain resilience. Specifically, information security and information leakage affect the effectiveness of information sharing, which in turn positively and negatively influence the supply chain resilience, respectively. This study posits that information security culture is instrumental to mitigate information leakage and foster effective information sharing to strengthen supply chain resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Wai-Peng Wong & Kim Hua Tan & Kannan Govindan & Di Li & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "A conceptual framework for information-leakage-resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 931-951, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:329:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04219-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04219-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04219-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04219-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sener, Abdurrezzak & Barut, Mehmet & Oztekin, Asil & Avcilar, Mutlu Yuksel & Yildirim, Mehmet Bayram, 2019. "The role of information usage in a retail supply chain: A causal data mining and analytical modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 87-104.
    2. Ponte, Borja & Framinan, Jose M. & Cannella, Salvatore & Dominguez, Roberto, 2020. "Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains: The interplay of information transparencies, return rates, and lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Tabasso, Nicole, 2019. "Diffusion of multiple information: On information resilience and the power of segregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 219-240.
    4. Xu Guan & Baoshan Liu & Ying‐ju Chen & Hongwei Wang, 2020. "Inducing Supply Chain Transparency through Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 725-749, March.
    5. Benjamin R. Tukamuhabwa & Mark Stevenson & Jerry Busby & Marta Zorzini, 2015. "Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5592-5623, September.
    6. Kamalahmadi, Masoud & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2016. "A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 116-133.
    7. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    8. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2019. "Research Opportunities in Supply Chain Transparency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 2946-2959, December.
    9. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    10. Mangus, Stephanie M. & Bock, Dora E. & Jones, Eli & Folse, Judith Anne Garretson, 2020. "Examining the effects of mutual information sharing and relationship empathy: A social penetration theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 375-384.
    11. Emma Brandon-Jones & Brian Squire & Chad W. Autry & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2014. "A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 55-73, July.
    12. John R. Macdonald & Christopher W. Zobel & Steven A. Melnyk & Stanley E. Griffis, 2018. "Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 4337-4355, June.
    13. Mambo Governor Mupepi & Aslam Modak & Jaideep Motwani & Sylvia C. Mupepi, 2017. "How Can Knowledge Leakage be Stopped: A Socio-Technical System Design Approach to Risk Management," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 26-41, January.
    14. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    15. Krishnan S. Anand & Manu Goyal, 2009. "Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 438-452, March.
    16. Ioannidis, Christos & Pym, David & Williams, Julian & Gheyas, Iffat, 2019. "Resilience in information stewardship," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 638-653.
    17. Bin Shen & Tsan-Ming Choi & Stefan Minner, 2019. "A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: information updating and information asymmetry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4898-4936, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Giulio Marcucci & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica & Giovanni Mazzuto & Maurizio Bevilacqua, 2024. "Analysis of ripple effect and its impact on supply chain resilience: a general framework and a case study on agri-food supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 175-200, March.
    3. Qiansong Zhang & Yingying Zhang & Taiwen Feng, 2024. "Impacts of paradox cognition and organizational unlearning on supply chain resilience: a perspective of paradox theory," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1022-1038, September.
    4. Jianlan Zhong & Han Cheng & Fu Jia, 2024. "Supply chain resilience capability factors in agri-food supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 850-868, September.
    5. Radebe, Nomkhosi & Chipangamate, Nelson, 2024. "Mining industry risks, and future critical minerals and metals supply chain resilience in emerging markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    7. Bo Li, 2024. "A dynamic model of the supply chain resilience cycle: concept mapping using the Cynefin framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1553-1562, December.
    8. Jie Zhao & Ji Yun Lee & Dane Camenzind & Michael Wolcott & Kristin Lewis & Olivia Gillham, 2023. "Multi-Component Resilience Assessment Framework for a Supply Chain System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    10. Nikookar, Ethan & Gligor, David & Russo, Ivan, 2024. "Supply chain resilience: When the recipe is more important than the ingredients for managing supply chain disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Chavez, Roberto & Yang, Jiehui, 2019. "Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 352-362.
    12. Betto, Frida & Garengo, Patrizia, 2023. "A circular pathway for developing resilience in healthcare during pandemics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    13. Pam Manhart & James K. Summers & Jennifer Blackhurst, 2020. "A Meta‐Analytic Review of Supply Chain Risk Management: Assessing Buffering and Bridging Strategies and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 66-87, July.
    14. Papanagnou, Christos & Seiler, Andreas & Spanaki, Konstantina & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Bourlakis, Michael, 2022. "Data-driven digital transformation for emergency situations: The case of the UK retail sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    15. Iftikhar, Anas & Purvis, Laura & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 408-425.
    16. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 581-607, December.
    17. Evangelos Gkanatsas & Harold Krikke, 2020. "Towards a Pro-Silience Framework: A Literature Review on Quantitative Modelling of Resilient 3PL Supply Chain Network Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. repec:osf:osfxxx:2spt3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bygballe, Lena E. & Dubois, Anna & Jahre, Marianne, 2023. "The importance of resource interaction in strategies for managing supply chain disruptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Maglietta, Amedeo & Oropallo, Eugenio, 2023. "Sailing through a digital and resilient shipbuilding supply chain: An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    21. Anirban Ganguly & John V. Farr, 2024. "An Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach to Evaluate Barriers to Resiliency in Indian Pharmaceutical Supply Chains," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(4), pages 599-616, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:329:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04219-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.