IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v10y2020i1d10.1007_s13162-020-00169-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reimagining marketing doctoral programs

Author

Listed:
  • Manjit S. Yadav

    (Texas A&M University)

Abstract

In this essay, my focus is on one critically important aspect of marketing doctoral programs: theory development. Theory animates everything we do in our discipline. Therefore, it is imperative that doctoral programs place theory at the heart of curriculum that shapes the thinking, priorities, and research efforts of our new scholars. Unfortunately, in many doctoral programs, this does not happen. To spur a conversation on this critically important issue in our discipline, I suggest five initiatives that seek to reimagine the content and structure of marketing doctoral programs. These initiatives are: (1) Add marketing to marketing doctoral programs; (2) Create a dedicated space in the curriculum for theory construction; (3) Restructure the sequence of doctoral seminars; (4) Make a foundational essay mandatory in dissertations; and (5) Change the culture of marketing doctoral programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjit S. Yadav, 2020. "Reimagining marketing doctoral programs," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 56-64, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:10:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-020-00169-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-020-00169-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-020-00169-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-020-00169-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manjit S. Yadav, 2019. "AMS Review: Progress toward a world-class journal dedicated to theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, June.
    2. Manjit S. Yadav, 2014. "Enhancing theory development in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, June.
    3. Manjit S. Yadav, 2017. "Disciplinary memory and theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-3, June.
    4. Gerald Zaltman, 2016. "Marketing’s forthcoming Age of imagination," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(3), pages 99-115, December.
    5. Preyas S. Desai & David Bell & Gary Lilien & David Soberman, 2012. "Editorial --The Science-to-Practice Initiative: Getting New Marketing Science Thinking into the Real World," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 1-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda L. Price, 2022. "Folds in historical time and possible worlds for the marketing discipline: A commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 162-167, December.
    2. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    3. Anu Helkkula & Eric Arnould, 2022. "Developing and renewing marketing as a scientific discipline through reflexive cocreation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 168-173, December.
    4. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2022. "Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, December.
    5. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    6. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    7. Liliana L. Bove & Thomas W. Gruen, 2023. "Lessons from the 2023 doctoral competition for conceptual articles: Identifying, nurturing, and publishing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, June.
    8. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "For re-institutionalizing the marketing discipline in Era V," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 189-198, December.
    9. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    10. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    11. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    12. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 188-195, December.
    13. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key, 2021. "The methodologies of the marketing literature: mechanics, uses and craft," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 416-431, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manjit S. Yadav, 2019. "AMS Review: Progress toward a world-class journal dedicated to theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, June.
    2. Manjit S. Yadav, 2017. "Disciplinary memory and theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-3, June.
    3. Shashank Vaid & Michael Ahearne, 2021. "The instantaneous commitment effect: developing stakeholder orientation among managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 162-179, June.
    4. Kamiński Jacek, 2017. "Systemic Paradigm in the Tradition of Marketing Science," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 29-42, December.
    5. Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Eleonora Di Maria, 2020. "Sustainability countenance in brand equity: a critical review and future research directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 15-34, January.
    6. Wolfgang Ulaga & Michael Kleinaltenkamp & Vishal Kashyap & Andreas Eggert, 2021. "Advancing marketing theory and practice: guidelines for crafting research propositions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 395-406, December.
    7. Aric Rindfleisch, 2020. "Transaction cost theory: past, present and future," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 85-97, June.
    8. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    9. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    10. Grewal, Dhruv & Roggeveen, Anne L. & Nordfält, Jens, 2016. "Roles of retailer tactics and customer-specific factors in shopper marketing: Substantive, methodological, and conceptual issues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1009-1013.
    11. Jeffrey R. Carlson & William T. Ross & Robin A. Coulter & Adam J. Marquardt, 2019. "About time in marketing: an assessment of the study of time and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 136-154, December.
    12. Marcel Lichters & Marko Sarstedt & Bodo Vogt, 2015. "On the practical relevance of the attraction effect: A cautionary note and guidelines for context effect experiments," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Robin A. Coulter, 2016. "From fragmentation to imagination: moving to Marketing’s next Era," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(3), pages 132-141, December.
    14. Jérémie Gallien & Stephen C. Graves & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2016. "OM Forum—Practice-Based Research in Operations Management: What It Is, Why Do It, Related Challenges, and How to Overcome Them," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 5-14, February.
    15. Manjit S. Yadav, 2018. "Making emerging phenomena a research priority," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 361-365, May.
    16. Saeed Tajdini, 2023. "The effects of internet search intensity for products on companies’ stock returns: a competitive intelligence perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 352-365, September.
    17. Bobby J. Calder & Alice M. Tybout, 2016. "What makes a good theory practical?," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(3), pages 116-124, December.
    18. Gregory Kivenzor, 2015. "Cultural dynamics and marketing strategies for emerging markets: characterization of group subcultures and consumption preferences," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 142-158, December.
    19. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    20. Bruno Dyck & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2021. "Sustainable marketing based on virtue ethics: addressing socio-ecological challenges facing humankind," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 115-132, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:10:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-020-00169-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.