IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v14y1997i1p81-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initiating home-style issues in a postreform Congress

Author

Listed:
  • William Browne
  • Won Paik

Abstract

This analysis examines initiatorsof specific issues within one large and encompassingpolicy domain in Congress, agriculture. The data arefrom an extensive survey of congressional members andstaff from stratified random samples of 113 individualoffices. One purpose is to determine differences betweenmembers with an agenda of new issues and those whobehave as maintainers of existing policy. The analysisalso finds that the circumstances of a postreformCongress enhance the importance of district effects onissue selection. These effects create substantiallymore congressional players within the domain thanwould be expected in much of the literature. Moreover,the behavior of these issue initiators seems largelydetermined by identifiable characteristics of theirhome-district populations. Those and other findings,especially the high rate of initiator success, callinto serious question many existing assumptions aboutexclusivity and specialization in committeedeliberations. It suggests instead that home-stylebehavior comes to Washington politics in ways thatexpand significantly the range of policy players. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Suggested Citation

  • William Browne & Won Paik, 1997. "Initiating home-style issues in a postreform Congress," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 14(1), pages 81-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:14:y:1997:i:1:p:81-95
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1007379407594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1007379407594
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1007379407594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Browne, William P. & Paik, Won K., 1994. "Farmers and the U.S. Congress: rethinking basic institutional assumptions about agricultural policy," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 11(2-3), pages 125-141, December.
    2. William P. Browne & Won K. Paik, 1994. "Farmers and the U.S. Congress: rethinking basic institutional assumptions about agricultural policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(2-3), pages 125-141, December.
    3. Hall, Richard L., 1987. "Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(1), pages 105-127, March.
    4. James T. Bonnen, 1973. "Implications for Agricultural Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(3), pages 391-398.
    5. David G. Abler, 1989. "Vote Trading on Farm Legislation in the U.S. House," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 583-591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Callahan, Scott, 2016. "The Impact of Agricultural Political Action Committee Donations on Repeated Farm Bill Votes," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235558, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Scott Callahan, 2018. "Farmer Campaign Finance: Determinants of Contibutions to Political Action Committees," Working Papers 18-12, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    3. William J. Martin, 1990. "Public Choice Theory And Australian Agricultural Policy Reform," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(3), pages 189-211, December.
    4. Ekor, Maxwell & Katz, Menachem & Iweala, Ola, 2014. "Estimating Legislative Effectiveness in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 107696, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Meekhof, Ronald L. & Penn, J.B. & Johnson, James & Miller, Thomas A., 1980. "Agricultural-Food Policy Review," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 279723, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Jonathan Brooks, 1996. "Agricultural Policies In Oecd Countries: What Can We Learn From Political Economy Models?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 366-389, January.
    7. Ronald N. Johnson & Gary D. Libecap, 2003. "Transaction Costs and Coalition Stability under Majority Rule," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 193-207, April.
    8. Goedecke, E. J. & Ortmann, G. F., 1992. "Farm Worker Legislation: Interest Groups And Developments," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.
    9. Callahan, Scott, 2018. "Farmer Campaign Finance: Determinants of Contributions to Political Action Committees," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273868, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Schmitz, Andrew, 1995. "Sugar: The Free Trade Myth and the Reality of European Subsidies," International Working Paper Series 237436, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    11. Stavins, Robert & Keohane, Nathaniel & Revesz, Richard, 1997. "The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-25, Resources for the Future.
    12. Berry, Christopher R. & Fowler, Anthony, 2018. "Congressional committees, legislative influence, and the hegemony of chairs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:14:y:1997:i:1:p:81-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.