IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijote/v7y2019i1p92-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation Investigation: The Cognitive Reflection Test and the Math National Evaluation scores

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Tamas

    (Center of International Business and Economics; The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to assess the relationship between the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) scores and the Math National Evaluation scores. The CRT measures the general tendency of most students to choose the easy, but wrong answer instead thinking in order to discover the correct answer. To the author?s knowledge, this is the first analysis of the relationship between CRT scores and Math scores at secondary school level. Quantitative methods were used: statistical analyze and econometric methods, using SPSS, the Pearson correlation. A critical assessment of the literature review was made too. Two versions of CRT were used: the original CRT and the long CRT (LCRT), including 10 items from other CRT alternatives. It was proved that there is a significant, strong and positive correlation between the Math National Evaluation scores and the Cognitive Reflection Test scores, in both versions, the original CRT and the 10 items Long Cognitive Reflection Test. More, it was proved that both CRT and LCRT are predictors not only for students? performance on national evaluation, but on another types of external evaluation, like simulation, as well as on internal evaluations too, like semestrial evaluation. Also, the results proved that the students who previously made this type of problems obtained better results than the ones who were never exposed to these tests. As a recommendation, optional courses focused on logical reasoning could have a positive impact on Math National Evaluation scores. The main limitation of the paper is that the participants were only from the Eastern part of Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Tamas, 2019. "Correlation Investigation: The Cognitive Reflection Test and the Math National Evaluation scores," International Journal of Teaching and Education, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 92-103, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijote:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:92-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-teaching-education/publication-detail-17436
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-teaching-education/publication-detail-17436?download=7
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Elsdon & Krishna Busawon & Anne Vigouroux & Richard Binns & Ian Forbes & Vanessa Railland, 2018. "A comparative assessment of delivery methods of mathematics and technology enhanced learning," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 8309085, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:99-113 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2009. "Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 147-152, October.
    4. Giovanna Zanolla, 2018. "The gender gap in math. Evidences of a study in the primary school in the Swiss canton of Ticino," International Journal of Teaching and Education, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 103-125, April.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:182-191 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2009. "Cognitive Abilities and Behavioral Biases," Working Papers 0465, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Bigoni & D. Dragone, 2011. "An experiment on experimental instructions," Working Papers wp794, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    2. Benjamin Enke & Florian Zimmermann, 2019. "Correlation Neglect in Belief Formation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 313-332.
    3. Dohmen, Thomas & Falk, Armin & Huffman, David & Marklein, Felix & Sunde, Uwe, 2009. "Biased probability judgment: Evidence of incidence and relationship to economic outcomes from a representative sample," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 903-915, December.
    4. Ciril Bosch-Rosa & Thomas Meissner & Antoni Bosch-Domènech, 2018. "Cognitive bubbles," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(1), pages 132-153, March.
    5. Corgnet, Brice & DeSantis, Mark & Porter, David, 2020. "The distribution of information and the price efficiency of markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Jinrui Pan & Jason Shachat & Sijia Wei, 2020. "Cognitive reflection and economic order quantity inventory management: An experimental investigation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 998-1009, September.
    7. Neyse, Levent & Bosworth, Steven & Ring, Patrick & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2016. "Overconfidence, Incentives and Digit Ratio," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 130145, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Koch, Christian, 2013. "The Virtue Ethics Hypothesis: Is there a nexus between virtues and well-being?," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 80054, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Jonathan Chapman & Erik Snowberg & Stephanie Wang & Colin Camerer, 2018. "Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE)," NBER Working Papers 25072, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Arunachalam Narayanan & Brent B. Moritz, 2015. "Decision Making and Cognition in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1216-1234, August.
    11. Wenti Du, 2021. "News and Market Efficiency in the Japanese Stock Market," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 306-319, July.
    12. Eizo Akiyama & Nobuyuki Hanaki & Ryuichiro Ishikawa, 2017. "It is Not Just Confusion! Strategic Uncertainty in An Experimental Asset Market," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 563-580, October.
    13. Antoni Bosch-Domènech & Pablo Brañas-Garza & Antonio M. Espín, 2013. "Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection?," Working Papers 698, Barcelona School of Economics.
    14. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2019. "How related are risk preferences and time preferences?," CLTS Working Papers 4/19, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    15. Ray Saadaoui Mallek & Mohamed Albaity, 2019. "Individual differences and cognitive reflection across gender and nationality the case of the United Arab Emirates," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1567965-156, January.
    16. Thomas Dohmen & Armin Falk & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2018. "On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 115-134, Spring.
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:234-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kai Duttle & Keigo Inukai, 2015. "Complexity Aversion: Influences of Cognitive Abilities, Culture and System of Thought," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 846-855.
    19. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:5:p:660-684 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Brice Corgnet & Cary Deck & Mark DeSantis & David Porter, 2022. "Forecasting Skills in Experimental Markets: Illusion or Reality?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5216-5232, July.
    21. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Eizo Akiyama & Yukihiko Funaki & Ryuichiro Ishikawa, 2017. "Diversity in Cognitive Ability Enlarges Mispricing in Experimental Asset Markets," GREDEG Working Papers 2017-08, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    22. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo & Sofianos, Andis, 2014. "Higher Intelligence Groups Have Higher Cooperation Rates in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," IZA Discussion Papers 8499, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cognitive Reflection Test; Long Cognitive Reflection Test; Math National Evaluation; internal evaluation; external evaluation; students? performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijote:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:92-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijote.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.