IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/vgmu00/2021i2p34-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Отражение Экологических Приоритетов Государства В Закупочной Деятельности Государственных Организаций

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Экологические приоритеты государства не закреплены в виде обязательных норм в законодательстве, регулирующем государственные закупки, но отражены в стратегии развития государства и могут неявно влиять на деятельность органов власти, государственных компаний и бюджетных учреждений в Российской Федерации. Будут ли вышеуказанные организации применять в своей деятельности принципы приоритетной задачи государства, если нет прямого требования? Какие факторы, кроме директивного указания, влияют на решение организаций о том, реализовывать приоритетные принципы в своей деятельности или нет? Для ответа на эти вопросы были проанализированы факторы применения экологических критериев в закупочной деятельности. На основе опроса государственных заказчиков в 22 субъектах Российской Федерации выявлено, что примерно треть опрошенных органов публичной власти и государственных организаций применяют принципы экологичности в закупках. Тип закона, регулирующего закупочную деятельность организации, уровень власти, размер организации, степень информированности сотрудников - основные детерминанты решений о применении экологических принципов в закупочной деятельности. Результаты указывают, с одной стороны, на роль степени приверженности государственным целям и, с другой стороны, на опасения совершить ошибку при принятии таких решений. Для повышения экологичности закупок представляется целесообразным включить экологические нормы в законодательство о госзакупках и разработать типовые критерии и рекомендации по их использованию.

Suggested Citation

  • Шадрина Е. В. & Виноградов Д. В. & Кашин Д. В., 2021. "Отражение Экологических Приоритетов Государства В Закупочной Деятельности Государственных Организаций," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 34-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:2:p:34-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2021/06/12/1441008839/2_Bloc_2_2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nissinen, A. & Parikka-Alhola, K. & Rita, H., 2009. "Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1838-1849, April.
    2. Testa, Francesco & Iraldo, Fabio & Frey, Marco & Daddi, Tiberio, 2012. "What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 88-96.
    3. Dmitri V. Vinogradov & Elena V. Shadrina, 2018. "Discouragement through incentives," Working Papers 2018_05, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    4. Vinogradov, Dmitri & Shadrina, Elena, 2013. "Non-monetary incentives in online experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 306-310.
    5. Esther Duflo & Michael Greenstone & Rohini Pande & Nicholas Ryan, 2018. "The Value of Regulatory Discretion: Estimates From Environmental Inspections in India," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 2123-2160, November.
    6. Dmitri V. Vinogradov & Elena V. Shadrina, 2018. "Discouragement through incentives," Working Papers 2018-05, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    7. A. A. Yakovlev & A. V. Tkachenko & Yu. D. Rodionova., 2018. "Reasons for contracting predetermined suppliers: Results of," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 10.
    8. Elena Shadrina & Irina Romodina, 2017. "Sustainable Public Procurement: International Experience," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 149-172.
    9. Островная Мария Валентиновна & Подколзина Елена Анатольевна, 2014. "Электронные Аукционы И Фаворитизм В Российских Государственных Закупках," Higher School of Economics Economic Journal Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 18(4), pages 586-619.
    10. Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean, 1991. "Auction design and favoritism," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 9-42, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinogradov, D. & Kashin, D. & Shadrina, E., 2022. "Institutional factors affect sustainability of public procurement of construction works in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 56(4), pages 141-170.
    2. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    3. Rosell, Jordi, 2023. "Did governments neglect the environment during the COVID-19 pandemic? An empirical analysis of green public procurement," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 835-849.
    4. Shadrina, Elena V. & Vinogradov, Dmitri V. & Kashin, Dmitry V., 2022. "Implicit incentives in green public procurement: Good intentions versus rigid regulations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Lindström, Hanna & Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov, 2021. "Green Public Procurement: An empirical analysis of the uptake of organic food policy," Umeå Economic Studies 997, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    6. Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Pablo Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª. Carmen González-Cruz, 2018. "Analysis of Green Public Procurement of Works by Spanish Public Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hou, Fujun & Abbas, Qaisar, 2021. "Sustainability challenges in public health sector procurement: An application of interpretative structural modelling," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Patrik Hall & Karl Löfgren & Gregory Peters, 2016. "Greening the Street-Level Procurer: Challenges in the Strongly Decentralized Swedish System," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 467-483, December.
    9. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Mirza, Faisal Mehmood & Hou, Fujun & Ashraf, Rana Umair, 2019. "Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. José Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Mª Carmen González-Cruz & Cristina González-Gaya, 2017. "Environmental Criteria in the Spanish Public Works Procurement Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Costache, Mioara & Sebastian Cristea, Dragos & Petrea, Stefan-Mihai & Neculita, Mihaela & Rahoveanu, Maria Magdalena Turek & Simionov, Ira-Adeline & Mogodan, Alina & Sarpe, Daniela & Rahoveanu, Adrian, 2021. "Integrating aquaponics production systems into the Romanian green procurement network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Pablo Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª Carmen González-Cruz & María Jose Bastante-Ceca, 2019. "Green Public Procurement at a Regional Level. Case Study: The Valencia Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Drogeanu Razvan & Magean Razvan & Petrea Stefan-Mihai & Cristea Dragos & Neculita Mihaela, 2021. "Perspectives of Including Aquaponics in Environmentally Preferable Procurement (EPP) Process for Supporting Green Economy," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 475-484.
    14. Chunling Yu & Toru Morotomi & Haiping Yu, 2020. "What Influences Adoption of Green Award Criteria in a Public Contract? An Empirical Analysis of 2018 European Public Procurement Contract Award Notices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Pelša Inese, 2019. "Green Public Procurement: Case Study of Latvian Municipalities," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 207-221, January.
    16. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta, 2017. "Antecedents of Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: A South African Experience," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 231-250, September.
    17. Ale-Chilet, Jorge & Chen, Cuicui & Li, Jing & Reynaert, Mathias, 2021. "Colluding Against Environmental Regulation," TSE Working Papers 21-1204, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    18. Timothy B. Armstrong & Michal Kolesár, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis using approximate moment condition models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(1), pages 77-108, January.
    19. Erica Bosio & Simeon Djankov & Edward Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Public Procurement in Law and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1117, April.
    20. Paqué, Karl-Heinz & Stehn, Jürgen & Horn, Ernst-Jürgen & Scharrer, Hans-Eckart & Koopmann, Georg, 1996. "National technology policies and international friction: Theory, evidence, and policy options," Kiel Discussion Papers 279, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:2:p:34-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ирина Александровна Зверева (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.