IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i5p1179-1200.html

Coercion and Consent under Techno-Economic Despotism: Workers’ Alienation and ‘Liberation’ in the Amazon Warehouse

Author

Listed:
  • MiÅ‚osz MiszczyÅ„ski

    (Kozminski University, Poland)

  • Patrizia Zanoni

    (Hasselt University, Belgium)

Abstract

This article explores the role of subjectivity in workers’ control in warehouses. Relying on Marx’s theory of the alienated subject under capitalism, we analyse the narratives of Polish Amazon workers to understand how alienating work produces a contradictory consenting subject. Workers are both estranged from the labour process, commodities, social relations and themselves, and simultaneously reconstituted as agents with new potentialities. Reflecting Marx’s ‘civilising’ dimension of capitalism, they are reconstituted as sellers of labour, consumers, individuals deserving respect and holders of legal rights. This transformation elicits workers’ consent to alienating work conditions because these new possibilities depend on such conditions. Our study advances discussions of control in global warehousing by highlighting how workers’ consent operates alongside coercion. It also advances our understanding of consent by showing that it is not merely a coping mechanism for meaningless work but rather emerges from workers’ integration into capitalist relations.

Suggested Citation

  • MiÅ‚osz MiszczyÅ„ski & Patrizia Zanoni, 2025. "Coercion and Consent under Techno-Economic Despotism: Workers’ Alienation and ‘Liberation’ in the Amazon Warehouse," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1179-1200, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:1179-1200
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251336954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251336954
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251336954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knut Laaser, 2022. "Meaningful Work and Sociology: An Introduction to This Themed Issue," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(5), pages 791-797, October.
    2. Simon Schaupp, 2022. "Algorithmic Integration and Precarious (Dis)Obedience: On the Co-Constitution of Migration Regime and Workplace Regime in Digitalised Manufacturing and Logistics," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 310-327, April.
    3. Mark Graham & Isis Hjorth & Vili Lehdonvirta, 2017. "Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 135-162, May.
    4. Magdalena Soffia & Alex J Wood & Brendan Burchell, 2022. "Alienation Is Not ‘Bullshit’: An Empirical Critique of Graeber’s Theory of BS Jobs," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(5), pages 816-840, October.
    5. Amanda Shantz & K. Alfes & C. Bailey & E. Soane, 2015. "Drivers and Outcomes of Work Alienation: Reviving a Concept," Post-Print hal-01563033, HAL.
    6. Shantz, Aamanda & Alfes, Kerstin & Bailey, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2015. "Drivers and outcomes of work alienation: reviving a concept," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64449, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayşe Göksu Özüdoğru & Ali Görener & Kerem Toker, 2024. "Effect of Hospital Employees’ Psychological Capital on Counterproductive Work Behavior: Role of Work Alienation and Procrastination," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    2. Bailey, Catherine & Madden, Adrian, 2019. "“We’re not scum, we’re human”: Agential responses in the face of meaningless work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    3. Maha Dajani & Mohamad Saad Mohamad, 2017. "Perceived Organisational Injustice and Counterproductive Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Work Alienation Evidence from the Egyptian Public Sector," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 192-192, April.
    4. Liu, Pei & Mu, Yuting & Li, Xin, 2025. "How does perceived overqualification beget workplace incivility? A moderated mediation model based on Kahn’s framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Frank Martela, 2023. "The Normative Value of Making a Positive Contribution–Benefiting Others as a Core Dimension of Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 811-823, July.
    6. S. Ramesh & C. Shobha, 2025. "Unequal gigs: developing a scale to measure socio-economic disparities among gig workers," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(3), pages 355-368, September.
    7. Gonzalez-Cabello, Martin & Siddiq, Auyon & Corbett, Charles J. & Hu, Catherine, 2025. "Fairness in crowdwork: Making the human AI supply chain more humane," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 645-657.
    8. Han He & Huasheng Zhu, 2025. "The People-Oriented Urban Planning Strategies in Digital Era—Inspiration from How Urban Amenities Shape the Distribution of Micro-Celebrities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Aldijana Bunjak & Olivier Zehnder, 2026. "Quantifying the gig economy’s evolution: A bibliometric exploration of historical patterns and future projections," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Desmond Ayentimi & Albert Amankwaa & John Burgess, 2025. "The Emerging Gig Economy and Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Lisa Gussek & Manuel Wiesche, 2023. "IT Professionals in the Gig Economy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 555-575, October.
    12. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    13. Xiaoxue Zhang & Dingyao Yu & Jiasi Yang, 2025. "Discovering the Dark Side of AI and Algorithmic HRM: Evidence from Negative Experiences of Employees on Online Delivery Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    14. Oren Ginzburg & Stefanie Weil & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2024. "Unnecessary organizational burden: a conceptual framework," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Sarah Cook & Uma Rani, 2025. "Platform Work in Developing Economies: Can Digitalisation Drive Structural Transformation?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 68(2), pages 395-416, June.
    16. Helwing Veronique & Verfürth Philip & Franz Martin, 2023. "Trucking (un)limited – the impact of digital platforms on labour in production networks of logistics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(4), pages 177-188, December.
    17. Thomas Anning-Dorson, 2026. "Digital platform sovereignty through Ubuntu: Re-imagining AI-enabled work future in Africa," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Geert De Neve & Kaveri Medappa & Rebecca Prentice, 2023. "India’s Gig Economy Workers at the Time of Covid-19: An Introduction," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 343-358, December.
    19. Ajeet Kumar Pankaj & Manish K. Jha, 2024. "Gig workers in precarious life: The trajectory of exploitation, insecurity, and resistance," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(5), pages 935-946, November.
    20. Huang, Yu & Kuang, Yidan, 2026. "Microwork as a development project: An ethnographic study of data annotators in Guizhou, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:1179-1200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.