IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v16y2002i2p341-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Directions in State and International Professional Occupations: Discretionary Decision-making and Acquired Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Evetts

    (University of Nottingham, UK julia.evetts@nottingham.ac.uk)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Evetts, 2002. "New Directions in State and International Professional Occupations: Discretionary Decision-making and Acquired Regulation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(2), pages 341-353, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:16:y:2002:i:2:p:341-353
    DOI: 10.1177/095001702400426875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001702400426875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001702400426875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dingwall, Robert & Fenn, Paul, 1987. ""A respectable profession"? Sociological and economic perspectives on the regulation of professional services," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 51-64, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Aleks, 2019. "What Professionals Want: Union and Employer Tactics in Representation Elections of Professional Workers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(3), pages 693-717, May.
    2. Crawford Spence & Chris Carter & Ataur Belal & Javier Husillos & Claire Dambrin & Pablo Archel, 2016. "Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(1), pages 3-20, February.
    3. Armstrong, Natalie & Hilton, Paul, 2014. "Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 208-214.
    4. Ricardo A. Ayala & Raf Vanderstraeten & Piet Bracke, 2014. "Prompting professional prerogatives: New insights to reopen an old debate about nursing," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 506-513, December.
    5. Julie Janssens & Natascha Van Mechelen, 2017. "Who is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up of Social Rights," Working Papers 1708, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    6. Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh & Calnan, Michael, 2013. "Discretion or discretions? Delineating professional discretion: The case of English medical practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 52-59.
    7. Tracey L Adams, 2020. "‘This Happens All the Time’: Organizations, Rationalization and Ethical Dilemmas in Engineering," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(6), pages 985-1003, December.
    8. Musselin, Christine, 2013. "How peer review empowers the academic profession and university managers: Changes in relationships between the state, universities and the professoriate," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1165-1173.
    9. Eeva Kesküla & Krista Loogma, 2017. "The value of and values in the work of teachers in Estonia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(2), pages 248-264, April.
    10. Märt Masso, 2013. "Determinants of employee work schedule and method control," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 451-469, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lankau, Matthias & Müller, Klaus, 2017. "Vor- und Nachteile des Meisterbriefs im Vergleich zu freiwilligen Qualifikationszertifikaten - Eine Analyse für das deutsche Handwerk," Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung 15, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    2. Niels Philipsen, 2011. "Professional Licensing and Self-regulation in Europe and China: A Law and Economics Perspective," Chapters, in: Michael Faure & Xinzhu Zhang (ed.), Competition Policy and Regulation, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Halliday, Terence C. & Carruthers, Bruce G., 1996. "The moral regulation of markets: Professions, privatization and the english insolvency act 1986," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 371-413, May.
    4. Dick M. Carpenter, 2008. "Regulation through titling laws: A case study of occupational regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 340-359, September.
    5. Niels J. Philipsen, 2013. "Regulation of Pharmacists: A Comparative Law and Economics Analysis," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 10(2), pages 225-241, August.
    6. Michael Faure, 2001. "A Selection of Empirical Socio-Economic Research with Respect to the Functioning of Legal Rules and Institutions in Belgium and the Netherlands," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 207-248, May.
    7. Shinnick, Edward, 2003. "Aspects of Regulatory Reform in the Irish Solicitor Profession: Review & Evaluation," Quarterly Economic Commentary: Special Articles, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), vol. 2003(2-Summer), pages 1-15.
    8. Edward Shinnick, 2002. "Identifying Spatial Markets for Personal Legal Services in Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 147-155.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:16:y:2002:i:2:p:341-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.