IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i3p685-702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Professionalism as a Mode of Regulation: Evidence from the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Kirkpatrick

    (University of York, UK)

  • Sundeep Aulakh

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Daniel Muzio

    (University of York, UK)

Abstract

Opinion is divided on how far and in what ways professionalism as a mode of regulation has evolved. To date, attention has focused on the impact of neoliberal political and economic ideologies that challenge the idea that professions should be trusted to regulate themselves. This article further examines the impact of these attacks on professionalism and assesses whether they have triggered a process of decline. Drawing on a range of documentary sources from the US, it suggests that, while professional modes of regulation are evolving, the dominant pattern is one of continuity. The analysis also draws attention to the path-dependent nature of professionalism and how it is associated with increasing returns for key stakeholders: producers, government regulators and employers. The article’s main contribution is to highlight these trends empirically and raise questions about the accuracy and value of grand narratives that over-emphasise change and understate the self-reinforcing nature of professional modes of regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Kirkpatrick & Sundeep Aulakh & Daniel Muzio, 2023. "The Evolution of Professionalism as a Mode of Regulation: Evidence from the United States," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(3), pages 685-702, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:685-702
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211035297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211035297
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211035297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:685-702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.