IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v29y2025i2p177-185.html

Role of Family Management in R&D Investments: Indian Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Gagandeep Singh
  • Amanpreet Kaur

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the influence of family management on R&D investments of Indian companies. Panel regression analysis is undertaken on the data of top 200 Indian companies (the final sample got reduced to 179 companies) listed on Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) over a period of 5 years from 2015 to 2019. The results reveal that family management supports R&D investments. The presence of family members on top management positions have a significant positive influence for both capital R&D expenditures and revenue R&D expenses. Given the restructuring of Indian corporate governance system, the findings recommend continual of family management as Indian way of management as it actively supports research and development investments thereby significantly influencing growth of the firm. The non-family members must support the strategic envision of family managers as the latter are more emotionally linked with the firm. The study contributes to the existing literature by examining the impact of family management on capital R&D expenditures and revenue R&D expenditures separately to gain meaningful insights about the attitude of family owners towards R&D investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gagandeep Singh & Amanpreet Kaur, 2025. "Role of Family Management in R&D Investments: Indian Evidence," Vision, , vol. 29(2), pages 177-185, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:177-185
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629211066280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629211066280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629211066280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Villalonga, Belen & Amit, Raphael, 2006. "How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 385-417, May.
    2. Francesco Aiello & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo, 2020. "Innovation and productivity in family firms: evidence from a sample of European firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 394-416, May.
    3. A. Ashwin & Rishikesha Krishnan & Rejie George, 2015. "Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 869-900, December.
    4. Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & John van Reenen, 1999. "Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(3), pages 529-554.
    5. Del Canto, Jesus Galende & Gonzalez, Isabel Suarez, 1999. "A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 891-905, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Wei & Ling Chen, 2022. "Dispersion of Family Ownership and Innovation Input in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. H. T. Tran & E. Santarelli, 2013. "Determinants and Effects of Innovative Activities in Vietnam. A Firm-level Analysis," Working Papers wp909, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    3. Minglin Wang & Mengna Xu & Qiuqin He, 2022. "The impacts of family involvement on R&D investment intensity in firms: Evidence from China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 277-294, March.
    4. Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis & Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "Do social policies foster innovation? Evidence from India's CSR regulation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    5. Min, Byung-seong, 2021. "Heterogeneity of R&D in family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 88-95.
    6. Francesco Aiello & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo, 2024. "Family firm heterogeneity and patenting. Revising the role of size and age," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 105-133, June.
    7. Wang, Zhonghui “Hugo” & Randolph, Robert & Su, Emma & Memili, Esra, 2023. "How does the founding family matter in corporate governance? A study of the entrenchment heterogeneity among S&P 1,500 firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Saim Kashmiri & Vijay Mahajan, 2014. "A Rose by Any Other Name: Are Family Firms Named After Their Founding Families Rewarded More for Their New Product Introductions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 81-99, September.
    9. Jiang, Fuxiu & Shi, Wei & Zheng, Xiaojia, 2020. "Board chairs and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese family-controlled firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 109-118.
    10. Mengna Xu & Minglin Wang & Yiyang Han, 2023. "Family management, family succession, and R&D investment: An empirical study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 293-319, March.
    11. Lin, Hsing-Er & Yu, Andy & Stambaugh, Jeff & Tsao, Chiung-Wen & Wang, Rebecca Jen-Hui & Hsu, I-Chieh, 2023. "Family CEO duality and research and development intensity in public family enterprises: Temporality as a model boundary," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Mariarosaria Agostino & Sabrina Ruberto, 2023. "Family Ties, Social Capital and Small Businesses’ Efficiency. Evidence from the Italian Food Sector," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 935-955, December.
    13. Junjie Guang & Yang (Eric) Zhou & Lei Gong & Li Xia & Zhiying Liu, 2025. "Does family ownership reduce exploratory innovation in family firms? The moderating role of the generational stage," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 1485-1515, September.
    14. Amit Chakrabarti & Kaveri Krishnan, 2021. "Change in Illiquidity of Family Firms with Institutional Pressure: Evidence from India," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 173-197.
    15. Díez-Esteban, José María & Farinha, Jorge Bento & García-Gómez, Conrado Diego, 2016. "The role of institutional investors in propagating the 2007 financial crisis in Southern Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 439-454.
    16. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel Karakara & Evans Osabuohien, 2020. "ICT adoption, competition and innovation of informal firms in West Africa: a comparative study of Ghana and Nigeria," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 397-414, June.
    18. Paul Seabright, 2005. "National and European Champions - Burden or Blessing?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(02), pages 52-55, August.
    19. Lepetit, Laetitia & Saghi-Zedek, Nadia & Tarazi, Amine, 2015. "Excess control rights, bank capital structure adjustments, and lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 574-591.
    20. Heino, Noora & Alimov, Naufal & Tuominen, Pasi, 2024. "Family firm employment behavior during a financial crisis: Does generational stage matter?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:177-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.