IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v17y2013i4p293-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Performance Measurement System for Apparel Sector Lean Manufacturing Organizations in Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • P.S.T. Perera
  • H.S.C. Perera

Abstract

Performance measurements systems were rarely adapted to changing manufacturing environments. Lean is one such practice aiming at productivity improvements. Non-cost performance improvements resulting from lean makes the inadequacy of traditional measurements for evaluating performance. Sri Lankan apparel manufacturers adapt lean manufacturing to meet global business challenges. However a study has not been done to develop an appropriate performance measurement system for lean environment in Sri Lankan apparel sector lean practicing companies. This study develops such a model from literature review and interview. Finally it is validated with the existing models.

Suggested Citation

  • P.S.T. Perera & H.S.C. Perera, 2013. "Developing a Performance Measurement System for Apparel Sector Lean Manufacturing Organizations in Sri Lanka," Vision, , vol. 17(4), pages 293-301, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:293-301
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262913505371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262913505371
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262913505371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    2. Chi Anh Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2010. "Contribution of quality management and just-in-time production practices to manufacturing performance," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 23-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich & Raphael Bink & Janis S. Neufeld, 2019. "Prognostic Model Development with Missing Labels," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(3), pages 327-343, June.
    2. António Abreu & Rúben Piedade, 2018. "Decision Support Model in the Strategic Management of the Portuguese Air Force Alpha Jet Fleet," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 72-81.
    3. Johannes Freiesleben & Nicolas Gu'erin, 2015. "Homogenization and Clustering as a Non-Statistical Methodology to Assess Multi-Parametrical Chain Problems," Papers 1505.03874, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    4. Jakov Batelić & Karlo Griparić & Dario Matika, 2021. "Impact of Remediation-Based Maintenance on the Reliability of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Hung, Yick-Hin & Li, Leon Y.O. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Uncovering hidden capacity in overall equipment effectiveness management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič & Basim Al-Najjar & Boštjan Gomišček, 2018. "Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Murad, C.A. & Bellinello, M.M. & Silva, A.J. & Netto, A. Caminada & de Souza, G.F.M. & Nabeta, S.I., 2022. "A novel methodology employed for ranking and consolidating performance indicators in holding companies with multiple power plants based on multi-criteria decision-making method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    8. Green, Kenneth W. & Inman, R.Anthony & Birou, Laura M. & Whitten, Dwayne, 2014. "Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 125-135.
    9. David Sanchez-Londono & Giacomo Barbieri & Luca Fumagalli, 2023. "Smart retrofitting in maintenance: a systematic literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Karolina Kolinska & Boguslaw Sliwczynski & Lukasz Hadas & Adam Kolinski, 2017. "Operational Controlling In The Management Of Spare Parts Availability," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 17, pages 139-156.
    11. V. N. Aju kumar & Piyush Gupta & O. P. Gandhi, 2019. "Maintenance performance evaluation using an integrated approach of graph theory, ISM and matrix method," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(1), pages 57-82, February.
    12. Ball, Peter & Lunt, Peter, 2020. "Lean eco-efficient innovation in operations through the maintenance organisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 405-415.
    13. Antti Puurunen & Jukka Majava & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Pekka Kess, 2013. "Applicaability of the (Q,R)-Model in Maintenance Meterials Management," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    14. Giacomo Barbieri & Jose Daniel Hernandez, 2024. "Sustainability Indices and RAM Analysis for Maintenance Decision Making Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Yang Li & Qirong Tang & Qing Chang & Michael P. Brundage, 2017. "An event-based analysis of condition-based maintenance decision-making in multistage production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4753-4764, August.
    16. Jamal Ahmed Hama Kareem & Kadhim Faraj Arif Saeed & Omar Mustafa Muhammad Faraj, 2019. "Maintenance Practices in Poor Uptime of Operating Equipment Toward Dynamic of Business Issues," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Ezutah Udoncy Olugu & Kuan Yew Wong & Jonathan Yong Chung Ee & Yslam D. Mammedov, 2022. "Incorporating Sustainability and Maintenance for Performance Assessment of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: A Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Anh Chi Phan & Ha Thu Nguyen & Hao Anh Nguyen & Yoshiki Matsui, 2019. "Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. A. K. Muchiri & B. W. Ikua & P. N. Muchiri & P. K. Irungu, 2017. "Development of a theoretical framework for evaluating maintenance practices," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 198-207, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:293-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.