IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p807-d722589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Sustainability and Maintenance for Performance Assessment of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: A Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ezutah Udoncy Olugu

    (Department of Mechanical and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology & Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia)

  • Kuan Yew Wong

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Jonathan Yong Chung Ee

    (Department of Mechanical and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology & Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia)

  • Yslam D. Mammedov

    (Department of Mechanical and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology & Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia)

Abstract

The existence of external two-fold pressure regarding competitiveness and sustainable development in a capital-intensive industry supports the need for sustainable performance. However, endeavors to create a sustainable framework to measure the performance of the oil and gas (O&G) industry are mostly devoted to the production and supply chain of petrochemical products and rarely focus on a maintenance perspective. Motivated by such scarcity, the goal of this research was to discuss and articulate the performance assessment framework by integrating concepts of maintenance and sustainability in the O&G industry. This study proposed the use of a range of performance measures for assessing sustainability on offshore production and drilling platforms. The conceptual framework consists of four aspects of sustainability categorized into technical, environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Each measure was assigned according to its relevance at the strategic, tactical, and functional levels of maintenance decision making. The conceptual framework resulted in hierarchical clusters of twelve strategic indicators. These indicators consist of conventional measures as well as new ones relating to the safety and reliability on offshore platforms. The potential contribution of the present study is found in its intention to empower a better understanding of sustainable maintenance and encourage those making decisions about practical implementation within the O&G industry. This paper culminates with directions for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezutah Udoncy Olugu & Kuan Yew Wong & Jonathan Yong Chung Ee & Yslam D. Mammedov, 2022. "Incorporating Sustainability and Maintenance for Performance Assessment of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: A Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:807-:d:722589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    2. Yousif Munadhil Ibrahim & Norsiah Hami & Siti Norezam Othman, 2019. "Integrating Sustainable Maintenance into Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and its Relationship with Sustainability Performance: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 30-39.
    3. Ibrahim H. Garbie & Rahma Al-Shaqsi, 2019. "Building sustainable models and assessments into petroleum companies: theory and application," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 473-512.
    4. Wan Hasrulnizzam Wan Mahmood & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Baba Md Deros & Husiah Mazli, 2011. "Maintenance management system for upstream operations in oil and gas industry: a case study," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 317-329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghaleb, Mageed & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2022. "Assessing the impact of maintenance practices on asset's sustainability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Maryam Afghah & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Seyed Mostafa Razavi & Mohammadreza Taghizadeh‐Yazdi, 2023. "Hard dimensions evaluation in sustainable supply chain management for environmentally adaptive and mitigated adverse eco‐effect environmental policies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5044-5067, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich & Raphael Bink & Janis S. Neufeld, 2019. "Prognostic Model Development with Missing Labels," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(3), pages 327-343, June.
    2. António Abreu & Rúben Piedade, 2018. "Decision Support Model in the Strategic Management of the Portuguese Air Force Alpha Jet Fleet," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 72-81.
    3. Johannes Freiesleben & Nicolas Gu'erin, 2015. "Homogenization and Clustering as a Non-Statistical Methodology to Assess Multi-Parametrical Chain Problems," Papers 1505.03874, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    4. Jakov Batelić & Karlo Griparić & Dario Matika, 2021. "Impact of Remediation-Based Maintenance on the Reliability of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Hung, Yick-Hin & Li, Leon Y.O. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Uncovering hidden capacity in overall equipment effectiveness management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič & Basim Al-Najjar & Boštjan Gomišček, 2018. "Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Murad, C.A. & Bellinello, M.M. & Silva, A.J. & Netto, A. Caminada & de Souza, G.F.M. & Nabeta, S.I., 2022. "A novel methodology employed for ranking and consolidating performance indicators in holding companies with multiple power plants based on multi-criteria decision-making method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    8. David Sanchez-Londono & Giacomo Barbieri & Luca Fumagalli, 2023. "Smart retrofitting in maintenance: a systematic literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Karolina Kolinska & Boguslaw Sliwczynski & Lukasz Hadas & Adam Kolinski, 2017. "Operational Controlling In The Management Of Spare Parts Availability," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 17, pages 139-156.
    10. V. N. Aju kumar & Piyush Gupta & O. P. Gandhi, 2019. "Maintenance performance evaluation using an integrated approach of graph theory, ISM and matrix method," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(1), pages 57-82, February.
    11. P.S.T. Perera & H.S.C. Perera, 2013. "Developing a Performance Measurement System for Apparel Sector Lean Manufacturing Organizations in Sri Lanka," Vision, , vol. 17(4), pages 293-301, December.
    12. Ball, Peter & Lunt, Peter, 2020. "Lean eco-efficient innovation in operations through the maintenance organisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 405-415.
    13. Antti Puurunen & Jukka Majava & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Pekka Kess, 2013. "Applicaability of the (Q,R)-Model in Maintenance Meterials Management," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    14. Giacomo Barbieri & Jose Daniel Hernandez, 2024. "Sustainability Indices and RAM Analysis for Maintenance Decision Making Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Yang Li & Qirong Tang & Qing Chang & Michael P. Brundage, 2017. "An event-based analysis of condition-based maintenance decision-making in multistage production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4753-4764, August.
    16. Jamal Ahmed Hama Kareem & Kadhim Faraj Arif Saeed & Omar Mustafa Muhammad Faraj, 2019. "Maintenance Practices in Poor Uptime of Operating Equipment Toward Dynamic of Business Issues," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. A. K. Muchiri & B. W. Ikua & P. N. Muchiri & P. K. Irungu, 2017. "Development of a theoretical framework for evaluating maintenance practices," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 198-207, January.
    19. Maletič Damjan & Maletič Matjaž & Al-Najjar Basim & Gotzamani Katerina & Gianni Maria & Kalinowski T. Bartosz & Gomišček Boštjan, 2017. "Contingency Factors Influencing Implementation of Physical Asset Management Practices," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(1), pages 3-16, February.
    20. Díaz Cazañas Ronald & De La Paz Martínez Estrella María & Delgado Sobrino Daynier Rolando & Košťál Peter & Mudriková Andrea, 2018. "Integrating Production and Maintenance Planning as an Element of Success at the Tactical Level: A Fuzzy Control Theory Approach," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 26(42), pages 109-117, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:807-:d:722589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.