IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vikjou/v49y2024i4p290-301.html

Weight Restriction Approach in a Two-stage Network Structure: A DEA-based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Azam Pourhabib Yekta
  • Mahnaz Maghbouli

Abstract

The standard data envelopment analysis model aimed to maximize the efficiency scores using the most favourable input/output weights. In two-stage network structures, the presence of intermediate undesirable measures leads to a distinct domain of weight restriction study. In the presence of undesirable intermediate measures and equipped with non-cooperative game theory, this study developes a joint weight restriction approach to derive a common set of weights. Concurrently, the overall efficiency of the system can be evaluated. Numerical instances of 34 OECD countries in 2012 have been presented to elucidate the details and applicability of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Azam Pourhabib Yekta & Mahnaz Maghbouli, 2024. "Weight Restriction Approach in a Two-stage Network Structure: A DEA-based Approach," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 49(4), pages 290-301, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:49:y:2024:i:4:p:290-301
    DOI: 10.1177/02560909241295830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02560909241295830
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02560909241295830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiani Mavi, Reza & Saen, Reza Farzipoor & Goh, Mark, 2019. "Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 553-562.
    2. Chu, Junfei & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Production scale-based two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 283-294.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Roll, Y & Golany, B., 1993. "Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 99-109, January.
    5. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    6. Omrani, Hashem & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shamsi, Meisam & Fahimi, Pegah, 2022. "Evaluation of insurance companies considering uncertainty: A multi-objective network data envelopment analysis model with negative data and undesirable outputs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    7. Liang Liang & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2008. "DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 643-653, October.
    8. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2021. "A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: The perspective of centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 3-15.
    9. Liu, Wenbin & Zhou, Zhongbao & Ma, Chaoqun & Liu, Debin & Shen, Wanfang, 2015. "Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 74-87.
    10. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    11. Jie Wu & Junfei Chu & Qingyuan Zhu & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2016. "Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1446-1458, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lívia Mariana Lopes de Souza Torres & Francisco de Sousa Ramos, 2026. "Data envelopment analysis and game theory: Where are we? Where are we going?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(2), pages 929-983, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Tsaples & Jason Papathanasiou & Andreas C. Georgiou, 2022. "An Exploratory DEA and Machine Learning Framework for the Evaluation and Analysis of Sustainability Composite Indicators in the EU," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Peykani, Pejman & Seyed Esmaeili, Fatemeh Sadat & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, Mohsen & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Farhad, 2024. "Matrix-based network data envelopment analysis: A common set of weights approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Wu, Jie & Xu, Guangcheng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhang, Chaochao, 2021. "Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    5. Mergoni, Anna & Emrouznejad, Ali & De Witte, Kristof, 2025. "Fifty years of Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 389-412.
    6. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Jun Zhuang, 2018. "Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: a two-stage DEA-based approach," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 23-68, January.
    7. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Sepideh Kaffash, 2025. "Navigating Efficiency: Insights from One-Stage and Two-Stage DEA Modeling in the Airline Industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1451-1487, August.
    8. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    9. Alireza Amirteimoori & Tofigh Allahviranloo & Aliasghar Arabmaldar, 2024. "Scale elasticity and technical efficiency measures in two-stage network production processes: an application to the insurance sector," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Ming-Fu Hsu & Ying-Shao Hsin & Fu-Jiing Shiue, 2022. "Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 629-669, August.
    11. Fatemeh Sadat Seyed Esmaeili & Emran Mohammadi, 2024. "Z-number network data envelopment analysis approach: A case study on the Iranian insurance industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Khoveyni, Mohammad & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Eslami, Robabeh & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Variations effect of intermediate products on the second stage in two-stage processes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-48.
    13. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Jianhui Xie & Xiaoxuan Zhu & Liang Liang, 2020. "A multiplicative method for estimating the potential gains from two-stage production system mergers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 475-493, May.
    15. Zhu, Qingyuan & Xu, Shuqi & Sun, Jiasen & Li, Xingchen & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Energy efficiency evaluation of power supply system: A data-driven approach based on shared resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    16. Jing Fu, 2018. "Two-stage data envelopment analysis with undesirable intermediate measures: an application to air quality improvement in China," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 861-885, December.
    17. Mohammad Amirkhan & Hosein Didehkhani & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Ashkan Hafezalkotob, 2018. "Measuring Performance of a Three-Stage Network Structure Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Nash Bargaining Game: A Supply Chain Application," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1429-1467, September.
    18. I. Contreras & S. Lozano & M. A. Hinojosa, 2021. "A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2181-2201, September.
    19. Li, Wanghong & Li, Zhepeng & Liang, Liang & Cook, Wade D., 2017. "Evaluation of ecological systems and the recycling of undesirable outputs: An efficiency study of regions in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 77-86.
    20. Chu, Junfei & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Production scale-based two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 283-294.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:49:y:2024:i:4:p:290-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.