IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i16p3388-3404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New housing association development and its potential to reduce concentrations of deprivation: An English case study

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Crook

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Peter Bibby

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Ed Ferrari

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Sarah Monk

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Connie Tang

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Christine Whitehead

    (London School of Economics, UK)

Abstract

Social housing across Western Europe has become significantly more residualised as governments concentrate on helping vulnerable households. Many countries are trying to reduce the concentrations of deprivation by building for a wider range of households and tenures. In England this policy has two main strands: (1) including other tenures when regenerating areas originally built as mono-tenure social housing estates and (2) introducing social rented and low-cost homeownership into new private market developments through planning obligations. By examining where new social housing and low-cost home ownership homes have been built and who moves into them, this paper examines whether these policies achieve social mix and reduce spatial concentrations of deprivation. The evidence suggests that new housing association development has enabled some vulnerable households to live in areas which are not deprived, while some better-off households have moved into more deprived areas. But these trends have not been sufficient to stem increases in deprivation in the most deprived areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Crook & Peter Bibby & Ed Ferrari & Sarah Monk & Connie Tang & Christine Whitehead, 2016. "New housing association development and its potential to reduce concentrations of deprivation: An English case study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3388-3404, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:16:p:3388-3404
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015613044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015613044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015613044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Sautkina & Lyndal Bond & Ade Kearns, 2012. "Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 748-782.
    2. Mark Livingston & Ade Kearns & Nick Bailey, 2013. "Delivering Mixed Communities: The Relationship between Housing Tenure Mix and Social Mix in England's Neighbourhoods," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 1056-1080, October.
    3. John Hills, 2007. "Ends and Means: The future roles of social housing in England," CASE Reports casereport34, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stuart Hodkinson, 2012. "The new urban enclosures," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 500-518, October.
    2. Weinhardt, Felix, 2014. "Social housing, neighborhood quality and student performance," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 12-31.
    3. Gibbons, Stephen & Sanchez-Vidal, Maria & Silva, Olmo, 2020. "The bedroom tax," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Duncan Maclennan & Anthony O'Sullivan, 2013. "Localism, Devolution and Housing Policies," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 599-615, June.
    5. repec:pri:crcwel:wp09-24-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Suzanne Fitzpatrick & Hal Pawson, 2014. "Ending Security of Tenure for Social Renters: Transitioning to 'Ambulance Service' Social Housing?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 597-615, July.
    7. Justin van de Ven & Nicolas Hérault, 2019. "The evolution of tax implicit value judgements, redistribution and income inequality in the UK: 1968 to 2015," Working Papers 498, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    8. Allan Little, 2009. "Spatial Pattern of Economic Activity and Inactivity in Britain: People or Place Effects?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 877-897.
    9. repec:cep:sticas:/131 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Richard Lawder & David Walsh & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2014. "Healthy Mixing? Investigating the Associations between Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix and Health Outcomes for Urban Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 264-283, February.
    11. Alan Murie & Peter Williams, 2015. "A Presumption in Favour of Home Ownership? Reconsidering Housing Tenure Strategies," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 656-676, July.
    12. Chris Foye & David Clapham & Tommaso Gabrieli, 2018. "Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1290-1312, May.
    13. Glen Bramley & David Watkins & Noah Kofi Karley, 2011. "An Outcome-Based Resource Allocation Model for Local Education Services in Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 848-871, October.
    14. ., 2014. "Residential segregation and people sorting within cities," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 3, pages 54-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Jie Chen & Zan Yang & Ya Ping Wang, 2014. "The New Chinese Model of Public Housing: A Step Forward or Backward?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 534-550, June.
    16. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2023. "The Urban Renewal Matrix," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Power, Anne, 2008. "Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4487-4501, December.
    18. Hal Pawson & Moira Munro, 2010. "Explaining Tenancy Sustainment Rates in British Social Rented Housing: The Roles of Management, Vulnerability and Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 145-168, January.
    19. Eleonora Patacchini & Yves Zenou, 2011. "Neighborhood Effects And Parental Involvement In The Intergenerational Transmission Of Education," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 987-1013, December.
    20. Obolenskaya, Polina & Burchardt, Tania, 2016. "Public and private welfare activity in England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86454, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Anita Ratcliffe, 2010. "Housing wealth or economic climate: Why do house prices matter for well-being?," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 10/234, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    22. Kitty Stewart, 2007. "Employment trajectories for mothers in low-skilled work: Evidence from the British Lone Parent Cohort," CASE Papers case122, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:16:p:3388-3404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.