IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v41y2004i11p2211-2230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Accessibility and the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity in Eastern Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Paez

    (Centre for Spatial Analysis/School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1, paezha@mcmaster.ca)

Abstract

The continued integration of international economies is an unfolding process that has accelerated in recent years and that is believed to have the potential to impact on the structure of the spatial economy. The process is of interest from the viewpoint of the transport scholar, because a relevant question is whether, and if so to what extent, the economic changes implied by integration can be guided and influenced by transport infrastructure and services. A number of studies have been conducted, in particular in a European setting, that examine the potential links between accessibility and economic activity. The objective of this paper is to analyse the relationship between intermodal network accessibility and the spatial distribution of economic activities in an east Asian setting. To this end, a multivariate framework based on the use of spatial statistical models is proposed that furthers the methodological possibilities of accessibility analysis. The empirical findings suggest that, once contextual factors are considered, the influence of accessibility as an explanatory factor of the spatial distribution of economic activity in the region becomes very much diminished.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Paez, 2004. "Network Accessibility and the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity in Eastern Asia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2211-2230, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:11:p:2211-2230
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000268429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098042000268429
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098042000268429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing Shen, 2000. "New Telecommunications and Residential Location Flexibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1445-1463, August.
    2. B J Linneker & N A Spence, 1992. "Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1137-1154, August.
    3. Frank Bruinsma & Piet Rietveld, 1993. "Urban Agglomerations in European Infrastructure Networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 919-934, June.
    4. Piet Rietveld & Frank Bruinsma, 1998. "Is Transport Infrastructure Effective?," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-72232-5, Fall.
    5. Ojendal, J, 1997. "Regionalization in East Asia-Pacific? An Elusive Process," Research Paper 11, World Institute for Development Economics Research.
    6. Roger Vickerman & Klaus Spiekermann & Michael Wegener, 1999. "Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huong Dinh & Ben Freyens & Anne Daly & Yogi Vidyattama, 2017. "Measuring Community Economic Resilience in Australia: Estimates of Recent Levels and Trends," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1217-1236, July.
    2. Alain Pirotte & Jesús Mur, 2017. "Neglected dynamics and spatial dependence on panel data: consequences for convergence of the usual static model estimators," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2-3), pages 202-229, July.
    3. Liquan Guo & Zhongzhen Yang, 2018. "Evaluation of foreign trade transport accessibility for Mainland China," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 34-52, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunwoo Lim & Jean-Claude Thill, 2008. "Intermodal Freight Transportation and Regional Accessibility in the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(8), pages 2006-2025, August.
    2. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Ribeiro, Anabela & Antunes, António Pais & Páez, Antonio, 2010. "Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 125-132.
    4. Gutiérrez, Javier & Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 141-152.
    5. Meng, Xuechen & Lin, Shanlang & Zhu, Xiaochuan, 2018. "The resource redistribution effect of high-speed rail stations on the economic growth of neighbouring regions: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 178-191.
    6. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    8. Euijune Kim & Hyewon Shin, 2014. "Impact Analysis of Economic Linkages of South Korea with North Korea Using a CGE Model," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1512, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Maria Teresa Borzacchiello & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(1), pages 148-169, February.
    10. J Gutiérrez & A Monzón & J M Piñero, 1998. "Accessibility, Network Efficiency, and Transport Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(8), pages 1337-1350, August.
    11. Christos Evangelinos & Sebastian Ebert, 2011. "Zur Erreichbarkeit regional-ökonomischer Zentren: Die Messbarkeit verkehrlicher Anbindungsqualität," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 18(01), pages 33-39, February.
    12. Federica Rossi & Rico Maggi, 2019. "Business travel decisions and high-speed trains: an ordered logit approach," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 6, pages 1-16.
    13. Meijers, Evert & Hoekstra, Joris & Leijten, Martijn & Louw, Erik & Spaans, Marjolein, 2012. "Connecting the periphery: distributive effects of new infrastructure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 187-198.
    14. Páez, Antonio & Anjum, Zoha & Dickson-Anderson, Sarah E. & Schuster-Wallace, Corinne J. & Martín Ramos, Belén & Higgins, Christopher D., 2020. "Comparing distance, time, and metabolic energy cost functions for walking accessibility in infrastructure-poor regions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Kim, Hyojin & Sultana, Selima & Weber, Joe, 2018. "A geographic assessment of the economic development impact of Korean high-speed rail stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 127-137.
    16. Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Gutiérrez, Javier & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 185-203, March.
    17. Elena Lopez, 2005. "Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments - an accessibility approach," ERSA conference papers ersa05p480, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Johannes Brocker & d’Artis Kancs, 2001. "Methodology for the Assessment of Spatial Economic Impacts of Transport Projects and Policies," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2001_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    19. T Karst & Jan R Ritsema van Eck, 2003. "Evaluation of Accessibility Impacts of Land-Use Scenarios: The Implications of Job Competition, Land-Use, and Infrastructure Developments for the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(1), pages 69-87, February.
    20. Jasper Willigers & Han Floor & Bert van Wee, 2007. "Accessibility Indicators for Location Choices of Offices: An Application to the Intraregional Distributive Effects of High-Speed Rail in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2086-2898, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:11:p:2211-2230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.