IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soudev/v21y2026i1p117-145.html

Gender and Populism: How Do Welfare Schemes Influence the Voting Behaviour of Women in Contemporary West Bengal?

Author

Listed:
  • Suteertha Samanta
  • Aritra Chakraborty

Abstract

Gender is frequently overlooked in the analysis of contemporary populist politics, despite its significant influence on the policies enacted by populist regimes. This article aims to elucidate how populism in West Bengal strategically employs social welfare schemes to secure electoral support, particularly targeting female constituents. To facilitate a comprehensive investigation of the dynamics associated with these welfare schemes and their effects on women voters, this study utilizes qualitative research methodologies, specifically through in-depth semi-structured interviews with female participants. Following the transcription of these interviews and a thorough review of the respondents’ feedback, qualitative coding was employed for thematic analysis using NVivo 10, qualitative data analysis software. The results indicate that the respondents demonstrated a predominant awareness of welfare schemes instituted by the state government, whereas awareness of initiatives provided by the central government was notably limited, highlighting a critical gap in communication from national authorities. The welfare populism promoted by the All India Trinamool Congress had a profound impact on the electoral landscape. Participants expressed a sense of empowerment derived from these schemes, perceiving them as just compensation for their undervalued unpaid labour. This emerging sense of empowerment may lead to retrospective voting, as individuals reflect on the benefits accrued from these schemes when making their electoral decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Suteertha Samanta & Aritra Chakraborty, 2026. "Gender and Populism: How Do Welfare Schemes Influence the Voting Behaviour of Women in Contemporary West Bengal?," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 21(1), pages 117-145, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:117-145
    DOI: 10.1177/09731741261418383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731741261418383
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09731741261418383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicos Mouzelis, 1985. "On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities," Politics & Society, , vol. 14(3), pages 329-348, September.
    2. Ana L. De La O, 2013. "Do Conditional Cash Transfers Affect Electoral Behavior? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Mexico," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2013. "A Political Theory of Populism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(2), pages 771-805.
    4. Cesar Zucco, 2013. "When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil 2002–10," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(4), pages 810-822, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehmann, M. Christian & Matarazzo, Hellen, 2019. "Voters’ response to in-kind transfers: Quasi-experimental evidence from prescription drug cost-sharing in Brazil," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Abraham Aldama, 2022. "A theory of social programs, legitimacy, and citizen cooperation with the state," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 495-507, July.
    3. Patricia Justino & Bruno Martorano, 2016. "Redistribution, inequality and political participation: Evidence from Mexico during the 2008 financial crisis," WIDER Working Paper Series 140, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Michael Lokshin & Aylén Rodriguez‐Ferrari & Iván Torre, 2024. "Electoral cycles and public spending during the pandemic," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1077-1107, August.
    5. Ankush Goyal & Rajender Kumar, 2022. "Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(3), pages 602-617, December.
    6. Aidt, Toke & Asatryan, Zareh & Badalyan, Lusine, 2024. "Political consequences of (consumer) debt relief," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Frey, Anderson, 2019. "Cash transfers, clientelism, and political enfranchisement: Evidence from Brazil," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Jan Gromadzki & Katarzyna Sałach & Michał Brzeziński, 2024. "When populists deliver on their promises: the electoral effects of a large cash transfer programme in Poland," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(361), pages 320-345, January.
    9. Neil S. Williams, 2023. "Gender and institutions moderate the relationship between conditional cash transfers and political participation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(7), pages 1343-1359, December.
    10. Travers Barclay Child & Elena Nikolova, 2017. "War and Social Attitudes: Revisiting Consensus Views," HiCN Working Papers 258, Households in Conflict Network.
    11. Dionne, Kim Yi & Horowitz, Jeremy, 2016. "The Political Effects of Agricultural Subsidies in Africa: Evidence from Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 215-226.
    12. Pinto, Thiago L.S. & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Cajueiro, Daniel O., 2023. "How politics can influence the allocation of social program benefits: A case study of the Brazilian poverty reduction program Bolsa Família," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 77-89.
    13. Aidt, Toke & Asatryan, Zareh & Badalyan, Lusine, 2022. "Political consequences of consumer debt relief," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-049, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Philipp Kerler & Victor Araújo, 2025. "Distributive politics and asymmetric participation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 37(3), pages 179-208, July.
    15. Loewenthal, Amit & Miaari, Sami H. & Hoeffler, Anke, 2021. "Aid and Radicalization: The Case of Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza," IZA Discussion Papers 14265, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Yashodhan Ghorpade & Patricia Justino, 2019. "Winning or buying hearts and minds?: Cash transfers and political attitudes in Pakistan," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-91, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Yörük, Erdem & Öker, İbrahim & Şarlak, Lara, 2019. "Indigenous unrest and the contentious politics of social assistance in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Rubén Poblete Cazenave, 2021. "Reputation Shocks and Strategic Responses in Electoral Campaigns," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-049/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Jean-Francois Maystadt & Muhammad Kabir Salihu, 2015. "National or political cake?," Working Papers 100756558, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    20. Elinder, Mikael & Jordahl, Henrik & Poutvaara, Panu, 2015. "Promises, policies and pocketbook voting," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 177-194.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:117-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.