IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i5p925-932.html

Fixating on the future: An overview of increased astrology use

Author

Listed:
  • Abhilasha Das
  • Manoj Kumar Sharma
  • Himani Kashyap
  • Srijita Gupta

Abstract

Background: Interest in astrology has surged recently, possibly due to the uncertain conditions in the world due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While belief in astrology is common and socially legitimized in many cultures, a few instances of excessive engagement with astrological services or “fortune-telling addiction†are indicating a risk of adverse mental health consequences. Aim: To understand the existing research base on correlates of belief in astrology and fortune-telling. Method: We have carried out a scoping review to synthesize the available literature base on belief in astrology and to review the evidence for “fortune-telling addiction†using Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. Databases of PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, and SCOPUS were searched for relevant studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Results: The search findings revealed the association of belief in astrology with cognitive, personality, and psychological factors such as thinking style, self-concept verification, and stress. Case studies on “fortune-telling addiction†have conceptualized it as a possible behavioral addiction and have reported symptoms such as distress, cravings, and salience. Conclusions: However, further research on the condition along with its psychosocial determinants is necessary for the development of preventative and curative intervention efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhilasha Das & Manoj Kumar Sharma & Himani Kashyap & Srijita Gupta, 2022. "Fixating on the future: An overview of increased astrology use," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(5), pages 925-932, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:925-932
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640221094155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640221094155
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640221094155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Archy O. de Berker & Robb B. Rutledge & Christoph Mathys & Louise Marshall & Gemma F. Cross & Raymond J. Dolan & Sven Bestmann, 2016. "Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2024. "The sun's position at birth is unrelated to subjective well‐being: Debunking astrological claims," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(4), pages 835-844, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Jun & Korkmaz, Aslihan Gizem & Li, Youwei & Yue, Pengpeng & Yan, Yuhan, 2025. "The sword of damocles: Debt and depression," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D Daw, 2020. "A simple model for learning in volatile environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Peplow, Sally & Donnellan, Warren & Christiansen, Paul, 2025. "A retrospective exploration of care experiences shaping the mental health trajectories of children and young people in Care: Part 1 – The system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Daniel S Kluger & Nico Broers & Marlen A Roehe & Moritz F Wurm & Niko A Busch & Ricarda I Schubotz, 2020. "Exploitation of local and global information in predictive processing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Elizabeth Lomas & Julie McLeod, 2017. "Engaging with change: Information and communication technology professionals’ perspectives on change in the context of the ‘Brexit’ vote," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Brice Corgnet & Simon Gaechter & Roberto Hernán González, 2020. "Working too much for too little: stochastic rewards cause work addiction," Working Papers 2007, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Etienne (GATE Lyon St-Etienne), Université de Lyon.
    7. Giovanni Leone & Charlotte Postel & Alison Mary & Florence Fraisse & Thomas Vallée & Fausto Viader & Vincent Sayette & Denis Peschanski & Jaques Dayan & Francis Eustache & Pierre Gagnepain, 2022. "Altered predictive control during memory suppression in PTSD," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Toby Wise & Jochen Michely & Peter Dayan & Raymond J Dolan, 2019. "A computational account of threat-related attentional bias," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Candace M. Raio & Benjamin B. Lu & Michael Grubb & Grant S. Shields & George M. Slavich & Paul Glimcher, 2022. "Cumulative lifetime stressor exposure assessed by the STRAIN predicts economic ambiguity aversion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D. Daw, 2024. "Computational processes of simultaneous learning of stochasticity and volatility in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Corgnet, Brice & Hernán-González, Roberto & Kujal, Praveen, 2020. "On booms that never bust: Ambiguity in experimental asset markets with bubbles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Bae, Siye & Jo, Soojin & Shim, Myungkyu, 2023. "United States of Mind under Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 102-127.
    13. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D. Daw, 2021. "A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Alishba Hania & Chien-Chiang Lee & Farzan Yahya, 2025. "Climate anxiety, economic policy uncertainty, and green growth," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 1-34, February.
    15. John Deke & Mariel Finucane & Daniel Thal, "undated". "The BASIE (BAyeSian Interpretation of Estimates) Framework for Interpreting Findings from Impact Evaluations: A Practical Guide for Education Researchers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5a0d5dff375d42048799878be, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:925-932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.