IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i2p175-186.html

The Biological Basis of Learning

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Rodgers

Abstract

Background: Brain-based learning (BBL), also referred to as educational neuroscience , examines learning as a biological process. Teaching to support BBL requires blending of understanding of neuroscience with the practice of education. With BBL, the learning environment is designed to enhance the brain’s natural ability to learn. Aim: This manuscript describes the fundamentals of brain-based learning, translates the basic tenets of BBL to the simulation learning environment, and presents practical application strategies for simulation-based learning. Method: Focusing on the work of Renate and Geoffrey Caine, this article examines their approach to BBL, including the three core elements of brain-based learning experience: orchestrated immersion in complex environments, relaxed alertness , and active processing . The three elements of the Caine and Caine model are well-embedded in the larger BBL literature and have particular utility with simulation-based education. Results: The three core elements of BBL have direct application to simulation as a teaching and learning practice. This paper presents several specific strategies designed to enhance both the simulation event experience and the debriefing . Conclusion: The simulation learning environment can be adapted to capitalize on the tenets of BBL. Several instructional strategies are available to enhance the biological process of learning while utilizing simulation-based learning practices.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Rodgers, 2015. "The Biological Basis of Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 175-186, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:175-186
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115590585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115590585
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115590585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David M. Gaba & Steven K. Howard & Kevin J. Fish & Brian E. Smith & Yasser A. Sowb, 2001. "Simulation-Based Training in Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM): A Decade of Experience," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(2), pages 175-193, June.
    2. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.
    3. Guillaume Alinier, 2011. "Developing High-Fidelity Health Care Simulation Scenarios: A Guide for Educators and Professionals," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 9-26, February.
    4. Gert Jan Hofstede & Léon de Caluwé & Vincent Peters, 2010. "Why Simulation Games Work-In Search of the Active Substance: A Synthesis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 824-843, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Dieckmann & Susanne Molin Friis & Anne Lippert & Doris Østergaard, 2012. "Goals, Success Factors, and Barriers for Simulation-Based Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(5), pages 627-647, October.
    2. Gilbert Ahamer, 2013. "Game, Not Fight," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 272-301, April.
    3. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    4. Aad Slootmaker & Hans Hummel & Rob Koper, 2017. "Evaluating the Usability of Authoring Environments for Serious Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 553-578, August.
    5. Frank Ulrich & Niels Henrik Helms, 2017. "CREATING EVALUATION PROFILES FOR GAMES DESIGNED TO BE FUN: An Interpretive Framework for Serious Game Mechanics," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 695-714, October.
    6. David Kirschner & J. Patrick Williams, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 593-610, August.
    7. Korina Katsaliaki & Navonil Mustafee, 2015. "Edutainment for Sustainable Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 647-672, December.
    8. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    9. Frederick M. C. van Amstel & Julia A. Garde, 2016. "The Transformative Potential of Game Spatiality in Service Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(5), pages 628-650, October.
    10. Tracey Ledoux & Melissa Griffith & Debbe Thompson & Nga Nguyen & Kathy Watson & Janice Baranowski & Richard Buday & Dina Abdelsamad & Tom Baranowski, 2016. "An Educational Video Game for Nutrition of Young People," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 490-516, August.
    11. Lucy R. Zheng & Catherine M. Oberle & W. A. Hawkes-Robinson & Stéphane Daniau, 2021. "Serious Games as a Complementary Tool for Social Skill Development in Young People: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(6), pages 686-714, December.
    12. Rudy McDaniel & Joseph Fanfarelli, 2016. "Building Better Digital Badges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 73-102, February.
    13. Apinya Dhatsuwan & Monamorn Precharattana, 2016. "Blockyland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(4), pages 445-464, August.
    14. Jonna Koponen & Eeva Pyörälä & Pekka Isotalus, 2014. "Communication Skills for Medical Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 235-254, April.
    15. Jop van den Hoogen & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 489-511, October.
    16. Guillaume Der Sahakian & Guillaume Alinier & Georges Savoldelli & Denis Oriot & Morgan Jaffrelot & François Lecomte, 2015. "Setting Conditions for Productive Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 197-208, April.
    17. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    18. Dalia Majumdar & Pamela A. Koch & Heewon Lee Gray & Isobel R. Contento & Ana de Lourdes Islas-Ramos & Daniel Fu, 2015. "Nutrition Science and Behavioral Theories Integrated in a Serious Game for Adolescents," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(1), pages 68-97, February.
    19. Richard B. Powers & Kat Kirkpatrick, 2013. "Playing With Conflict," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(1), pages 51-72, February.
    20. Marcin Wardaszko & Błażej Podgórski, 2017. "Mobile Learning Game Effectiveness in Cognitive Learning by Adults: A Comparative Study," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(4), pages 435-454, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:175-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.