IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i2p197-208.html

Setting Conditions for Productive Debriefing

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Der Sahakian
  • Guillaume Alinier
  • Georges Savoldelli
  • Denis Oriot
  • Morgan Jaffrelot
  • François Lecomte

Abstract

Background . Debriefing is a fundamental step in simulation , particularly in the medical field. Simulation sometimes even serves as a pretext for debriefing . Most often, debriefing takes place easily, producing a qualitative feedback and an optimal learning transfer. But sometimes, the facilitator faces difficulties. An unproductive debriefing can be described as follows: the debriefing of a clinical simulation session is unproductive when facilitators or learners perceive the occurrence of an obstacle that has hindered the learning process. Objectives & method . Considering the difficulties encountered in this type of debriefing , we believe it is necessary to investigate the topic in depth in order to bring out some theoretical principles. Based on a Nominal Group Technique involving the authors of this article, this project aimed at drawing up and proposing informed recommendations for ensuring productive debriefing in simulation-based education in healthcare . Results . The authors make the following recommendations : Reflect on your own performances as an instructor (asking for feedback from the learners and peers, and being appropriately trained as an instructor who can facilitate learning) Establish simulation ground rules (preparing and briefing the learners before the simulation experience, controlling the timing of the simulation session and the quality of the scenarios ) Manage unexpected events and intended learning objectives by using a confederate during scenarios. Respect the steps of the debriefing process and good practice recommendations regarding learning psychology. Maintain the balance between emotion and teaching by decontextualizing the experience from the participants during the debriefing. Manage the input from the peers during the debriefing so they do not antagonise the learning process. Conclusion . Six key recommendations are proposed. They have been deemed as core skills required of every simulation facilitator to prepare for productive debriefing and so the set learning objectives of a simulation session can be achieved successfully.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Der Sahakian & Guillaume Alinier & Georges Savoldelli & Denis Oriot & Morgan Jaffrelot & François Lecomte, 2015. "Setting Conditions for Productive Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 197-208, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:197-208
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115576105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115576105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115576105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willy Christian Kriz, 2010. "A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Facilitation and Debriefing of Simulations and Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 663-680, October.
    2. Guillaume Alinier, 2011. "Developing High-Fidelity Health Care Simulation Scenarios: A Guide for Educators and Professionals," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 9-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dana Tschannen & Joseph D. Yaksich & Michelle Aebersold & Antonia Villarruel, 2016. "Fidelity After SECOND LIFE Facilitator Training in a Sexual Risk Behavior Intervention," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(1), pages 130-150, February.
    2. Lorin Walker & Ray Luechtefeld & Jo Anne Long Walker, 2019. "Creating Pathways to Personal Resilience Through Classroom Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(2), pages 214-242, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    2. Marcin Wardaszko, 2016. "Building Simulation Game-Based Teaching Program for Secondary School Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 287-303, June.
    3. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    4. Dana Ruggiero & William R. Watson, 2014. "Engagement Through Praxis in Educational Game Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 471-490, August.
    5. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch & Muhammad Hanif & David Watkins, 2023. "A Playful Approach to Household Sustainability: Results From a Pilot Study on Resource Consumption," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 104-130, February.
    6. Kristina Hermann, 2015. "Field Theory and Working With Group Dynamics in Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-220, April.
    7. Ai-Jou Pan & Yea-Tzu Yuan & Pao-Nan Chou, 2025. "Incorporating PaGamO and Postgame Group Discussions into an Elementary Mathematics Course: An Experimental Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    8. Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
    9. Hans J. E. Korteling & Anne S. Helsdingen & Ralf R. Sluimer, 2017. "An Empirical Evaluation of Transfer-of-Training of Two Flight Simulation Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 8-35, February.
    10. Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk & Jan H. G. Klabbers & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2026. "Advancing the Role of the Facilitator in Game Science: A Systems Theory Approach to Learning and Adaptation in Rule-Based and Open Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 57(2), pages 276-298, April.
    11. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    12. David L. Rodgers, 2015. "The Biological Basis of Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 175-186, April.
    13. Gilbert Ahamer, 2013. "Game, Not Fight," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 272-301, April.
    14. Willy C. Kriz & Eberhard Auchter, 2016. "10 Years of Evaluation Research Into Gaming Simulation for German Entrepreneurship and a New Study on Its Long-Term Effects," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 179-205, April.
    15. Cindy L. Kovalik & Chia-Ling Kuo, 2012. "Innovation Diffusion," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 803-824, December.
    16. Joseph Wolfe, 2016. "Assuring Business School Learning With Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 206-227, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:2:p:197-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.