IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v45y2014i4-5p471-490.html

Engagement Through Praxis in Educational Game Design

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Ruggiero
  • William R. Watson

Abstract

Background . Engagement in praxis , the process of acting and reflecting in a cyclical fashion, fosters the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among educational game designers. Resulting from this process, designers can apply their learned skills to create highly engaging educational games. Aim . This study examines the game development process of 22 international game designers from business, government, and academia as they describe their engagement in praxis when designing educational games. Method . Building upon research on reflective practice , this article provides insights on how engagement in praxis can be framed as a tool for educational game design that naturally promotes learning and motivation during gameplay. The researchers examine common threads that illustrate the process that educational video game designers use to create games. Results . Four common threads or themes were pulled from in-depth interviews with each designer. In this article, we focus on engagement in designing and applying game mechanics , engagement in content and context in educational games, feedback as an indicator of motivation and engagement, and working within project constraints to create engaging experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Ruggiero & William R. Watson, 2014. "Engagement Through Praxis in Educational Game Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 471-490, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:471-490
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878114553570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878114553570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878114553570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Crookall & Warren Thorngate, 2009. "Acting, Knowing, Learning, Simulating, Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 8-26, February.
    2. Jonathan Moizer & Jonathan Lean, 2010. "Toward Endemic Deployment of Educational Simulation Games: A Review of Progress and Future Recommendations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(1), pages 116-131, February.
    3. Willy Christian Kriz, 2010. "A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Facilitation and Debriefing of Simulations and Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 663-680, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cindy L. Kovalik & Chia-Ling Kuo, 2012. "Innovation Diffusion," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 803-824, December.
    2. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    3. Marcin Wardaszko, 2016. "Building Simulation Game-Based Teaching Program for Secondary School Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 287-303, June.
    4. Guillaume Der Sahakian & Guillaume Alinier & Georges Savoldelli & Denis Oriot & Morgan Jaffrelot & François Lecomte, 2015. "Setting Conditions for Productive Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 197-208, April.
    5. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    6. Pieter W. G. Bots & F. Pieter Wagenaar & Rolf Willemse, 2010. "Assimilation of Public Policy Concepts Through Role-Play: Distinguishing Rational Design and Political Negotiation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 743-766, October.
    7. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch & Muhammad Hanif & David Watkins, 2023. "A Playful Approach to Household Sustainability: Results From a Pilot Study on Resource Consumption," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 104-130, February.
    8. Kristina Hermann, 2015. "Field Theory and Working With Group Dynamics in Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-220, April.
    9. Elizabeth Koh & Yeo Gee Kin & Bimlesh Wadhwa & John Lim, 2012. "Teacher Perceptions of Games in Singapore Schools," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 51-66, February.
    10. Ai-Jou Pan & Yea-Tzu Yuan & Pao-Nan Chou, 2025. "Incorporating PaGamO and Postgame Group Discussions into an Elementary Mathematics Course: An Experimental Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    11. Tor Söderström & Lars Häll & Tore Nilsson & Jan Ahlqvist, 2014. "Computer Simulation Training in Health Care Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(6), pages 805-828, December.
    12. Bradley E. Wiggins, 2012. "Toward a Model for Intercultural Communication in Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(4), pages 550-572, August.
    13. Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
    14. Oleg V. Pavlov & Khalid Saeed & Lawrence W. Robinson, 2015. "Improving Instructional Simulation With Structural Debriefing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 383-403, June.
    15. M. A. van Haaften & I. Lefter & H. Lukosch & O. van Kooten & F. Brazier, 2021. "Do Gaming Simulations Substantiate That We Know More Than We Can Tell?," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 478-500, August.
    16. Hans J. E. Korteling & Anne S. Helsdingen & Ralf R. Sluimer, 2017. "An Empirical Evaluation of Transfer-of-Training of Two Flight Simulation Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 8-35, February.
    17. Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk & Jan H. G. Klabbers & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2026. "Advancing the Role of the Facilitator in Game Science: A Systems Theory Approach to Learning and Adaptation in Rule-Based and Open Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 57(2), pages 276-298, April.
    18. Dong-Young Kim, 2014. "Understanding Integrated Environmental Assessment in a Multi-Stakeholder Negotiation via Role-Play," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(1), pages 125-145, February.
    19. Jimmy Kyaw Tun & Guillaume Alinier & Jessica Tang & Roger L. Kneebone, 2015. "Redefining Simulation Fidelity for Healthcare Education," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 159-174, April.
    20. David Crookall, 2010. "Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 898-920, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:471-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.