IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v52y2021i4p478-500.html

Do Gaming Simulations Substantiate That We Know More Than We Can Tell?

Author

Listed:
  • M. A. van Haaften
  • I. Lefter
  • H. Lukosch
  • O. van Kooten
  • F. Brazier

Abstract

Background. Revealing tacit knowledge often is seen as very valuable for organizations, although it is usually challenging to enunciate and share this type of knowledge. Methods. This study uses a participatory design and the application of a board gaming simulation as instruments to extract tacit knowledge. To illustrate this application, the gaming simulation is played with entrepreneurs from horticulture. Horticulture represents a complex social system where tacit knowledge plays a major role in the trade process. A participatory design process is used to explore whether the design and play of gaming simulations enable participants to explicate their tacit knowledge. Participants’ participation in designing the gaming simulation explicated that reconstructing reality was a prerequisite for their commitment. Results. The results from playing simulation sessions show that participants were able to: (1) narrow down the anecdotic behaviour to a few factors; (2) to structure these factors; (3) explore how these factors relate to trade barriers and (4) to explain which tactics are applied to foster trade. Conclusion. The educational value of this study is that it helped entrepreneurs in understanding complex real-life situations.

Suggested Citation

  • M. A. van Haaften & I. Lefter & H. Lukosch & O. van Kooten & F. Brazier, 2021. "Do Gaming Simulations Substantiate That We Know More Than We Can Tell?," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 478-500, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:478-500
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120927048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120927048
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120927048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmytro Tykhonov & Catholijn Jonker & Sebastiaan Meijer & Tim Verwaart, 2008. "Agent-Based Simulation of the Trust and Tracing Game for Supply Chains and Networks," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(3), pages 1-1.
    2. David Crookall & Warren Thorngate, 2009. "Acting, Knowing, Learning, Simulating, Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 8-26, February.
    3. Rosemary Garris & Robert Ahlers & James E. Driskell, 2002. "Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 441-467, December.
    4. Willy C. Kriz, 2003. "Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 495-511, December.
    5. Véronique Ambrosini & Cliff Bowman, 2001. "Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 811-829, September.
    6. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Toyama, Ryoko & Nagata, Akiya, 2000. "A Firm as a Knowledge-Creating Entity: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Taber, 2008. "Emergency response: Elearning for paramedics and firefighters," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 515-527, December.
    2. Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina & Soto-Acosta, Pedro, 2010. "Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: An empirical investigation in SMEs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 521-528.
    3. Anna-Sofia Alklind Taylor & Per Backlund & Lars Niklasson, 2012. "The Coaching Cycle," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(5), pages 648-672, October.
    4. Jan Hense & Willy Christian Kriz & Joseph Wolfe, 2009. "Putting Theory-Oriented Evaluation Into Practice," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(1), pages 110-133, February.
    5. Martijn Koops & Martijn Hoevenaar, 2013. "Conceptual Change During a Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(4), pages 544-561, August.
    6. Silke Geithner & Daniela Menzel, 2016. "Effectiveness of Learning Through Experience and Reflection in a Project Management Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 228-256, April.
    7. Fang Li & Sheng Zhang & Yuhuan Jin, 2018. "Sustainability of University Technology Transfer: Mediating Effect of Inventor’s Technology Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Jan Resenga Maluleka & Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha & Isola Ajiferuke, 2016. "Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 337-355, May.
    9. Christelle Mariais & Florence Michau & Jean-Philippe Pernin, 2012. "A Description Grid to Support the Design of Learning Role-Play Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(1), pages 23-33, February.
    10. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    11. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Soni Agrawal, 2025. "Developing human capabilities for supply chains: an industry 5.0 perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 2075-2105, May.
    12. François MORIN (LEREPS-GRES), 2006. "The Capitalism of financial market and the control of cognitive (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2006-05, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    13. Wai-Ki Fu & Hing-Po Lo & Derek Drew, 2006. "Collective learning, collective knowledge and learning networks in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1019-1028.
    14. Der-Fang Hung, 2015. "Sustained Competitive Advantage and Organizational Inertia: The Cost Perspective of Knowledge Management," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 769-789, December.
    15. Harpreet Singh & David Kryscynski & Xinxin Li & Ram Gopal, 2016. "Pipes, pools, and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1649-1666, August.
    16. Li, Shenxue & Clark, Timothy & Sillince, John, 2018. "Constructing a strategy on the creation of core competencies for African companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 204-213.
    17. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    19. Jan H. G. Klabbers, 2003. "Simulation and Gaming:Introduction to the Art and Science of Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 488-494, December.
    20. Marco Greco & Nicola Baldissin & Fabio Nonino, 2013. "An Exploratory Taxonomy of Business Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 645-682, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:478-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.