IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sajbmc/v10y2021i3p260-275.html

Enabling Knowledge Management Initiatives through Organizational Communities of Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Abobakr Aljuwaiber

Abstract

Learning the concept of organizational communities of practice (OCoP) is very effective but too complicated when it comes to implementation. Challenges arise when cultivating OCoPs and creating effective communication processes, particularly within an organization that has a traditional hierarchy. Literature on knowledge management (KM) fails to provide an inclusive comprehension of the significance of OCoPs. Thus, the current exploratory research aims to determine how organizational contexts can enable or disable the establishment and development of OCoPs. This article is built on communities of practice (CoP) theory to study the phenomenon of intentionally established OCoPs within large organizations. The case studies conducted for this research involved two companies based in Saudi Arabia, with intentionally created OCoPs. The selected cases assist in providing a holistic understanding of the influential role of organizational context in enabling OCoP activities, using semi-structured interviews, document reviews and field notes. The study findings support an integrated framework to assist organizations in establishing effective OCoPs. Its five phases include establishment, enforcement, recognition, maintenance and sustainability , representing OCoP development phases. The resulting framework organized 16 enabling or disabling factors in OCoP development. This article expands the focus of research beyond traditional CoPs, to investigate the intentional establishment of OCoPs within organizations and understand opportunities and challenges that enable OCoPs. The study argues that organizations implementing OCoPs should offer a comprehensive, long-term strategy for KM initiatives that leads to designing OCoP activities that enable better alignment with the organization’s business plan. A company can shape perceptions and behaviours by establishing the organizational context for social interaction. Thus, this article extends the perspective on developing OCoPs within organizations and argues that the role of middle management requires more thoughtfulness about OCoP research.

Suggested Citation

  • Abobakr Aljuwaiber, 2021. "Enabling Knowledge Management Initiatives through Organizational Communities of Practice," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 10(3), pages 260-275, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:260-275
    DOI: 10.1177/22779779211036961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779779211036961
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779779211036961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes S. Schwarz & Christine Legner, 2020. "Business model tools at the boundary: exploring communities of practice and knowledge boundaries in business model innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 421-445, September.
    2. Oyemomi, Oluwafemi & Liu, Shaofeng & Neaga, Irina & Chen, Huilan & Nakpodia, Franklin, 2019. "How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 313-319.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka & Ryoko Toyama, 2005. "The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 14(3), pages 419-436, June.
    4. Vicente Peñarroja & Jesús Sánchez & Nuria Gamero & Virginia Orengo & Ana M. Zornoza, 2019. "The influence of organisational facilitating conditions and technology acceptance factors on the effectiveness of virtual communities of practice," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 845-857, August.
    5. Joanne Roberts, 2006. "Limits to Communities of Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 623-639, May.
    6. Lefebvre, Virginie Marie & Sorenson, Douglas & Henchion, Maeve & Gellynck, Xavier, 2016. "Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 570-579.
    7. Keng-Boon Ooi & Weng-Choong Cheah & Binshan Lin & Pei-Lee Teh, 2012. "TQM practices and knowledge sharing: An empirical study of Malaysia’s manufacturing organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 59-78, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Conklin & Anita Kothari & Paul Stolee & Larry Chambers & Ken LeClair, 2024. "Moving Knowledge into Action Through Communities of Practice: Multiple Case Studies of Successful System Change to Improve the Health of Older Adults," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2_suppl), pages 21582440241, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    2. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    3. Daniel R. Terry & Hoang Nguyen & Blake Peck & Andrew Smith & Hoang Phan, 2020. "Communities of practice: A systematic review and meta‐synthesis of what it means and how it really works among nursing students and novices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 370-380, February.
    4. Arslan Ayub & Muhammad Salman Aslam & Hanan Iftekhar & Adeel Razzaq & Sabiha Hafeez, 2013. "Compete or Leapfrog: Creating Blue Ocean through Entrepreneurial Orientation," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(5), pages 211-221, October.
    5. Turner, Simon & Allen, Pauline & Bartlett, Will & Pérotin, Virginie, 2011. "Innovation and the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of the independent sector treatment centre programme," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 522-529, August.
    6. Yin Hang & Yuhan Zhang, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Inheritance Imperative: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Reverse Tacit Knowledge Transfer," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18884-18929, December.
    7. Ma Yuan & Cao Yue-qun & Wang Hao & Xiang Hong, 2022. "Does Social Capital Promote Health?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 501-524, July.
    8. Simon Turner, 2013. "Absorptive Capacity: The Role of Communities of Practice," Working Papers wp444, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    9. Umale Okoh & Philip Jehu & Abubakar Abubakar, "undated". "Explicit knowledge and tax revenue performance: The role of externalization process," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202214, Reviewsep.
    10. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    11. Reza Dabestani & Allahvirdi Taghavi & Mohammad Saljoughian, 2014. "The Relationship between Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Service Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(1), pages 81-101, February.
    12. Conrad Wiedeler & Nadine Kammerlander, 2021. "Learning the ropes of entrepreneurship: understanding internal corporate venturing for family firms from an entrepreneurial learning perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 669-703, April.
    13. Ahmed Abdullah Danook & Muthanna Saad Yassin & Omar Falah Hasan al.obaidy & Ferman jarad Almejdhab, 2024. "The Absorptive Capacity of Knowledge as an Approach for Building Strategic Reliability in the Sponge Organizations/Small Organizations in Kirkuk Governorate as a Model," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 33-51, February.
    14. Nancy Ettlinger, 2009. "Surmounting City Silences: Knowledge Creation and the Design of Urban Democracy in the Everyday Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 217-230, March.
    15. Esthela Galván-Vela & Eduardo Arango Herrera & Deisy Milena Sorzano Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Sandra Dubouloz & Anne Berthinier-Poncet & Luciana Castro Gonçalves & Emilie Ruiz & Catherine Thevenard-Puthod, 2021. "Innovation communities: from their characterization to the questioning of their boundaries [Comunidades de innovación: desde su caracterización hasta el cuestionamiento de sus fronteras]," Post-Print hal-02891869, HAL.
    17. Lee, Seung-Hyun & Makhija, Mona & Paik, Yongsun, 2008. "The value of real options investments under abnormal uncertainty: The case of the Korean economic crisis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 16-34, January.
    18. Paola Lara Machado & Montijn Ven & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken & Jan Brocke, 2024. "Navigating Business Model Redesign: The Compass Method for Identifying Changes to the Operating Model," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 607-638, October.
    19. Lei Xu & Ronggui Ding & Lei Wang, 2022. "How to facilitate knowledge diffusion in collaborative innovation projects by adjusting network density and project roles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1353-1379, March.
    20. Silvia Rita Sedita & Silvia Blasi & Jiawen Yang, 2022. "The cultural dimensions of sustainable development: A cross‐country configurational analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1838-1849, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:260-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.