IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i2p21582440231180107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Contradictory Online Reviews on Consumer Online Purchase Decision: Experimental Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Le Bo
  • Yimo Chen
  • Xiaoli Yang

Abstract

Most consumers read online reviews before making online purchase decisions. Online reviews of a product usually include positive and negative contradictory online reviews (CORs). Previous studies have confirmed the impact of CORs on consumers’ online purchase decisions. However, literature review showed that most of the conducted studies on the dimension of CORs are single dimension. Therefore, this study examined how CORs affected consumers’ online purchase decisions from two dimensions: proportion of positive and negative reviews and emotional arousal. The results of a two (proportion of positive and negative reviews: high vs. low) × 2 (emotional arousal: calm vs. arousing) inter group experiment from 306 Chinese consumers showed that CORs have a significant negative impact on consumers’ purchase online decision, and CORs affect consumers’ online purchase decision by affecting perceived risk. The results of this study enrich literature of online reviews. Findings of this study provide important information to e-retailers on how CORs affect consumers’ online purchase decisions. The theoretical and practical implications of the proposed study are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Bo & Yimo Chen & Xiaoli Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Contradictory Online Reviews on Consumer Online Purchase Decision: Experimental Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231180107
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231180107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231180107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231180107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz-Mafe, Carla & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Curras-Perez, Rafael, 2018. "The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers' purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 336-344.
    2. Weisstein, Fei L. & Song, Lei & Andersen, Peter & Zhu, Ying, 2017. "Examining impacts of negative reviews and purchase goals on consumer purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 201-207.
    3. Guo, Junpeng & Wang, Xiaopan & Wu, Yi, 2020. "Positive emotion bias: Role of emotional content from online customer reviews in purchase decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    4. Wu Yanyan, 2018. "Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Consumers' Satisfaction in Online Shopping Agricultural Products in China," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 16(3), pages 64-77, July.
    5. Snehasish Banerjee & Alton Y. K. Chua & Jung-Jae Kim, 2017. "Don't be deceived: Using linguistic analysis to learn how to discern online review authenticity," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(6), pages 1525-1538, June.
    6. Bigne, Enrique & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Ruiz, Carla, 2020. "Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 403-416.
    7. Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2016. "Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 131-144, March.
    8. Mohamed Daassi & Sana Debbabi, 2021. "Intention to reuse AR-based apps: The combined role of the sense of immersion, product presence and perceived realism," Post-Print hal-03372420, HAL.
    9. Muhammad Rifki Shihab & Audry Pragita Putri, 2019. "Negative online reviews of popular products: understanding the effects of review proportion and quality on consumers’ attitude and intention to buy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 159-187, March.
    10. Martin R. Zemborain & Gita Venkataramani Johar, 2007. "Attitudinal Ambivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 506-514, December.
    11. Jie Ren & William Yeoh & Mong Shan Ee & AleÅ¡ PopoviÄ, 2018. "Online consumer reviews and sales: Examining the chicken†egg relationships," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(3), pages 449-460, March.
    12. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    13. Richard Williams, 2010. "Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(4), pages 540-567, December.
    14. Zhao, Yan & Wen, Lingling & Feng, Xiangnan & Li, Ran & Lin, Xiaolin, 2020. "How managerial responses to online reviews affect customer satisfaction: An empirical study based on additional reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Robert J. Fisher & Mark Vandenbosch & Kersi D. Antia, 2008. "An Empathy-Helping Perspective on Consumers' Responses to Fund-Raising Appeals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 519-531, February.
    16. Jiménez, Fernando R. & Mendoza, Norma A., 2013. "Too Popular to Ignore: The Influence of Online Reviews on Purchase Intentions of Search and Experience Products," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 226-235.
    17. Fu, Senhui & Yan, Qing & Feng, Guangchao Charles, 2018. "Who will attract you? Similarity effect among users on online purchase intention of movie tickets in the social shopping context," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 88-102.
    18. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print hal-03511270, HAL.
    19. Wei Zhang & Linhui Sun & Xinping Wang & Anbo Wu, 2022. "The influence of AI word‐of‐mouth system on consumers' purchase behaviour: The mediating effect of risk perception," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 516-530, May.
    20. Yang, Luming & Xu, Min & Xing, Lin, 2022. "Exploring the core factors of online purchase decisions by building an E-Commerce network evolution model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Zou & Yupeng Li & Jiahuan Huang, 2022. "Group interaction and evolution of customer reviews based on opinion dynamics towards product redesign," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1131-1151, December.
    2. Zheng, Lili, 2021. "The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 226-251.
    3. Petcharat, Thanatchaphan & Jattamart, Aungkana & Leelasantitham, Adisorn, 2023. "A conceptual model to imply a negative innovation assessment framework on consumer behaviors through the electronic business platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Wang, Yihan & Zhong, Ke & Liu, Qihua, 2022. "Let criticism take precedence: Effect of side order on consumer attitudes toward a two-sided online review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 403-419.
    5. Shankar, Amit & Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Ashaduzzaman, Md, 2020. "How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Tonghui & Mao, Zhixin, 2022. "How online reviews and coupons affect sales and pricing: An empirical study based on e-commerce platform," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Ketron, Seth, 2017. "Investigating the effect of quality of grammar and mechanics (QGAM) in online reviews: The mediating role of reviewer crediblity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 51-59.
    8. Meek, Stephanie & Wilk, Violetta & Lambert, Claire, 2021. "A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 354-367.
    9. Zhang, Mingyue & Zhao, Haichuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "How much is a picture worth? Online review picture background and its impact on purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-144.
    10. Tata, Sai Vijay & Prashar, Sanjeev & Gupta, Sumeet, 2020. "An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts on purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Cheng Zhao & Chong Alex Wang, 2023. "A cross-site comparison of online review manipulation using Benford’s law," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 365-406, March.
    12. Prateep Puengwattanapong & Adisorn Leelasantitham, 2022. "A Holistic Perspective Model of Plenary Online Consumer Behaviors for Sustainable Guidelines of the Electronic Business Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-38, May.
    13. Ismagilova, Elvira & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Slade, Emma, 2020. "Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Xueke Du & Rui Dong & Wenli Li & Yibo Jia & Lirong Chen, 2019. "Online Reviews Matter: How Can Platforms Benefit from Online Reviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Shah, Adnan Muhammad & Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Yan, Xiangbin, 2023. "Do online peer reviews stimulate diners’ continued log-in behavior: Investigating the role of emotions in the O2O meal delivery apps context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    17. Jin, Wangyan & Chen, Yuangao & Yang, Shuiqing & Zhou, Shasha & Jiang, Hui & Wei, June, 2023. "Personalized managerial response and negative inconsistent review helpfulness: The mediating effect of perceived response helpfulness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Wang, Xingyuan & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng Allan, 2023. "The influence of online review dispersion on consumers’ purchase intention: The moderating role of dialectical thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Li, Kunlin & Chen, Yuhan & Zhang, Liyi, 2020. "Exploring the influence of online reviews and motivating factors on sales: A meta-analytic study and the moderating role of product category," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    20. Bai, Yanzhuang & Li, Tingwu & Zheng, Chundong, 2022. "Is there any value in the online reviews of remedial satisfied customers? An empirical study in the hospitality industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231180107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.