IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i1p21582440221079886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Investigation of the Academic Emotions of Gaokao Applicants during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wu
  • Muzhou Li
  • Fuchun Zhu
  • Weichun Zhong

Abstract

This global lockdown of educational institutions by COVID-19 has caused overwhelming disruption in students’ learning and assessment, which has substantial effects on their academic emotions. This study applied a mixed methods approach to investigate how COVID-19 influences Gaokao applicants’ academic emotions in the Chinese context. The study found that Gaokao applicants during the COVID-19 pandemic had strong positive activating emotions, positive deactivating emotions, and negative activating emotions. The results showed that there were significant gender differences in academic emotions, and students’ physical exercise was also related. This study found that there was no correlation between the Gaokao applicants’ academic emotions and their parents’ occupations, parents’ academic qualifications, or types of exams. As COVID-19 continues to be a worldwide public challenge, this study has implications on how to alleviate negative academic emotions of students who will take high-risk tests under the pressure of the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wu & Muzhou Li & Fuchun Zhu & Weichun Zhong, 2022. "Empirical Investigation of the Academic Emotions of Gaokao Applicants during the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221079886
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221079886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221079886
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221079886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agneta H Fischer & Mariska E Kret & Joost Broekens, 2018. "Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Lv, Bo & Lv, Lijie & Yan, Zhonglian & Luo, Liang, 2019. "The relationship between parental involvement in education and children's academic/emotion profiles: A person-centered approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 175-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10027:y:2022:i:1:p:253-268 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chara Papoutsi & Irene Chaidi & Athanasios Drigas & Charalabos Skianis & Charalampos Karagiannidis, 2022. "Emotional Intelligence and ICTs for Women and Equality," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 253-268, January.
    3. Ana Belén Górriz & Edgardo Etchezahar & Diego E. Pinilla-Rodríguez & María del Carmen Giménez-Espert & Ana Soto-Rubio, 2021. "Validation of TMMS-24 in Three Spanish-Speaking Countries: Argentina, Ecuador, and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Catalda Corvasce & Juan Pedro Martínez-Ramón & Inmaculada Méndez & Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban & Francisco Manuel Morales-Rodríguez & María Belén García-Manrubia, 2022. "Emotional Strengths and Difficulties in Italian Adolescents: Analysis of Adaptation through the SDQ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Ms. Chie Aoyagi & Alistair Munro, 2019. "Guilt, Gender, and Work-Life Balance in Japan: A Choice Experiment," IMF Working Papers 2019/261, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Elizabeth Han & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2023. "Bots with Feelings: Should AI Agents Express Positive Emotion in Customer Service?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1296-1311, September.
    7. Li, Xuefeng & Yang, Han & Wang, Hui & Jia, Jin, 2020. "Family socioeconomic status and home-based parental involvement: A mediation analysis of parental attitudes and expectations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Carla Barros & Ana Sacau-Fontenla, 2021. "New Insights on the Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence and Social Support on University Students’ Mental Health during COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Matters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Iris Ron, 2020. "Factors Inhibiting Female Managers’ Advancement To Senior Positions," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 26, pages 99-122, December.
    10. Niva Dolev & Yariv Itzkovich & Bat Katzman, 2021. "A Gender-Focused Prism on the Long-Term Impact of Teachers’ Emotional Mistreatment on Resilience: Do Men and Women Differ in Their Quest for Social-Emotional Resources in a Masculine Society?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Christophe Haag & Lisa Bellinghausen & Mariya Jilinskaya-Pandey, 2023. "QEPro: An ability measure of emotional intelligence for managers in a French cultural environment," Post-Print hal-03209097, HAL.
    12. Bo Lv & Lijie Lv, 2021. "Out-of-School Activities on Weekdays and Adolescent Adjustment in China: a Person-Centered Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 783-798, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221079886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.