IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Agneta H Fischer
  • Mariska E Kret
  • Joost Broekens

Abstract

Previous meta-analyses and reviews on gender differences in emotion recognition have shown a small to moderate female advantage. However, inconsistent evidence from recent studies has raised questions regarding the implications of different methodologies, stimuli, and samples. In the present research based on a community sample of more than 5000 participants, we tested the emotional sensitivity hypothesis, stating that women are more sensitive to perceive subtle, i.e. low intense or ambiguous, emotion cues. In addition, we included a self-report emotional intelligence test in order to examine any discrepancy between self-perceptions and actual performance for both men and women. We used a wide range of stimuli and models, displaying six different emotions at two different intensity levels. In order to better tap sensitivity for subtle emotion cues, we did not use a forced choice format, but rather intensity measures of different emotions. We found no support for the emotional sensitivity account, as both genders rated the target emotions as similarly intense at both levels of stimulus intensity. Men, however, more strongly perceived non-target emotions to be present than women. In addition, we also found that the lower scores of men in self-reported EI was not related to their actual perception of target emotions, but it was to the perception of non-target emotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Agneta H Fischer & Mariska E Kret & Joost Broekens, 2018. "Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190712
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190712&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Wu & Muzhou Li & Fuchun Zhu & Weichun Zhong, 2022. "Empirical Investigation of the Academic Emotions of Gaokao Applicants during the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    2. Iris Ron, 2020. "Factors Inhibiting Female Managers’ Advancement To Senior Positions," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 26, pages 99-122, December.
    3. Chara Papoutsi & Irene Chaidi & Athanasios Drigas & Charalabos Skianis & Charalampos Karagiannidis, 2022. "Emotional Intelligence and ICTs for Women and Equality," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 253-268, January.
    4. Ms. Chie Aoyagi & Alistair Munro, 2019. "Guilt, Gender, and Work-Life Balance in Japan: A Choice Experiment," IMF Working Papers 2019/261, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Niva Dolev & Yariv Itzkovich & Bat Katzman, 2021. "A Gender-Focused Prism on the Long-Term Impact of Teachers’ Emotional Mistreatment on Resilience: Do Men and Women Differ in Their Quest for Social-Emotional Resources in a Masculine Society?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Elizabeth Han & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2023. "Bots with Feelings: Should AI Agents Express Positive Emotion in Customer Service?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1296-1311, September.
    7. Christophe Haag & Lisa Bellinghausen & Mariya Jilinskaya-Pandey, 2023. "QEPro: An ability measure of emotional intelligence for managers in a French cultural environment," Post-Print hal-03209097, HAL.
    8. Carla Barros & Ana Sacau-Fontenla, 2021. "New Insights on the Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence and Social Support on University Students’ Mental Health during COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Matters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Ana Belén Górriz & Edgardo Etchezahar & Diego E. Pinilla-Rodríguez & María del Carmen Giménez-Espert & Ana Soto-Rubio, 2021. "Validation of TMMS-24 in Three Spanish-Speaking Countries: Argentina, Ecuador, and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Catalda Corvasce & Juan Pedro Martínez-Ramón & Inmaculada Méndez & Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban & Francisco Manuel Morales-Rodríguez & María Belén García-Manrubia, 2022. "Emotional Strengths and Difficulties in Italian Adolescents: Analysis of Adaptation through the SDQ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Lorence R. Macahilig & Chris Feli Joy P. Tajonera, 2024. "Emotional Intelligence and Self-Harming Behavior of Junior High School Students with Absentee Parents in a Catholic University," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(9), pages 1204-1212, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.